Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Where do you go, when even Gentoo isn't enough?
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
lars_the_bear
Guru
Guru


Joined: 05 Jun 2024
Posts: 377

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:02 am    Post subject: Where do you go, when even Gentoo isn't enough? Reply with quote

Hi folks

I was drawn to Gentoo because I thought it offered the chance to keep my old-ish Lenovos running. When I retire (shortly), these will be the only computers I have, and I don't want to spend a chunk of my retirement savings on computers. And, in fact, Gentoo works fine on these computers.

But I'm increasingly sure that Gentoo isn't what I need, because keeping it up to date requires constant compilation. I've complained about this before but, so far as I can see, nobody has a solution that is workable for me.

But if not Gentoo, then what?

All the mainstream Linux versions (Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian) are too full of bloated cruft that is hard to remove (and I'm aware that one person's 'bloated cruft' is another person's 'essential infrastructure'). Linux variants that seem to be more lightweight either

- lack applications that I want to run, or
- are hobby projects with no clear future.

Is there any practical way to run Linux on a ten-year-old computer these days? By 'practical' I mean not as an enthusiast or a tinkerer, but just as somebody who wants to use a computer and not worry about it? Or are those days gone? Is Linux now only suitable for this year's hardware, unless you want to fiddle with it all the time?

BR, Lars.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asturm
Developer
Developer


Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 9113

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gentoo binhost was not an option for you?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lars_the_bear
Guru
Guru


Joined: 05 Jun 2024
Posts: 377

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

asturm wrote:
Gentoo binhost was not an option for you?


I'm perfectly happy to use Gentoo binaries, but it seems that my (very minimal) configuration/USE-flags mean that they mostly don't get used. I just started another thread about why I'm not getting the binary version of node2s, but my experience is that most things I install/update get built from source.

BR, Lars.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asturm
Developer
Developer


Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 9113

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't see what else will work for you then, or in other words, you're asking the wrong question. It should end with: " ... when Gentoo is too much"

Any binary distro alternative is unlikely to give you anything "lighter" than Gentoo binhost profile config, except maybe for disk space what with not having to install development files.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
szatox
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 27 Aug 2013
Posts: 3333

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alright, well, if you're looking for a binary distro, LFS is clearly not for you, and at this point writing your own ebuilds won't cut it either.

Maybe check out Devuan? I think it forked off of Debian, so should have a pretty decent software base, but it also uses OpenRC, so maybe you'll like it more than the original.
Looking for something smaller, DSL has made a comback though with a changed objective; it doesn't fit on 50MB businesscard CD anymore. I'd say it's more of a hobby project too, but hey, if you want something lean, it might actually be a good choice.
_________________
Make Computing Fun Again


Last edited by szatox on Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:58 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hu
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 22392

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you want to use the Gentoo binhost's binaries, you must accept the choices made by the people who built those binaries. That may mean enabling features you don't need, or disabling features you do need. If you want to run a system built exactly to your specifications, with nothing missing and nothing unnecessary, you will need either to build it yourself or to convince someone with better hardware to build it for you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zucca
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Posts: 3617
Location: Rasi, Finland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 1:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I need to choose something other than Gentoo, I'd go with:
  • Void Linux
  • Alpine Linux
  • Some BSD, maybe DragonflyBSD

_________________
..: Zucca :..
Gentoo IRC channels reside on Libera.Chat.
--
Quote:
I am NaN! I am a man!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeddySeagoon
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 05 Jul 2003
Posts: 54534
Location: 56N 3W

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 1:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lars_the_bear,

To sum up what you are saying ...
1. Binary distros give you too much bloat
2. Source distros take too much compile time.
3. You are about to retire and do not want to replace the hardware you have today which is adeqwate for running Linux. (Today).

Running and building Gentoo and probably other source based distros can be seperated onto different systems.
Both Oracle and Amazon have free offerings.
I have no idea if they will be adequate to build wat you want.
Then you install your own binaries on your Lenvos
It costs nothing to test.

Looking forward to long and happy retirement, how much longer do you expect the Lenvos to be adequate?
Software gets bigger every year. I suspect you will need a hardware ugrade in a few years. It's a question of when.
_________________
Regards,

NeddySeagoon

Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lars_the_bear
Guru
Guru


Joined: 05 Jun 2024
Posts: 377

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 1:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hu wrote:
If you want to use the Gentoo binhost's binaries, you must accept the choices made by the people who built those binaries. That may mean enabling features you don't need, or disabling features you do need. If you want to run a system built exactly to your specifications, with nothing missing and nothing unnecessary, you will need either to build it yourself or to convince someone with better hardware to build it for you.


Yeah. I think Gentoo is unsuitable for my needs. I'm trying to work out what, if anything else, might be suitable. Of course, that's not a Gentoo question -- it's a 'not Gentoo' question. I do understand that. I just thought somebody might have some ideas.

Right now, my feeling is that desktop Linux is basically unsuitable for old-ish computers. Gentoo is unsuitable because of all the compiling, and everything else is unsuitable because the pre-compiled distributions are too bloated and resource intensive. In 2015 Fedora absolutely flew on these computers. Now it won't even show a desktop without thrashing.

I find this situation deeply depressing but, of course, I'm not blaming anybody here for it.

BR, Lars.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hu
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 22392

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 2:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We do have an idea. Across multiple threads, including in my post that you quoted, we have advised that you need to compromise on what you build versus what you download as a prebuilt. You realistically cannot have all of:
  • Modern software
  • Everything tuned to your exact preferences
  • Everything built for you by someone else, at no cost to you
The easiest compromise is, as I suggested above, to accept the preferences of the person(s) who build things for you. If you absolutely require that everything be tuned to your preferences, you will need to build it yourself or convince someone else to make that exact build for you. This applies beyond Gentoo. You might find a distribution that has prebuilt preferences closer to your own, or you might not. I have been happy with Gentoo for a long time, so I have not kept up with what other distributions might be suitable for your particular preferences.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Banana
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 1627
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 2:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would use debian stable with a low resource DE to get old hardware going again.

Also there is a recent thread about the rigth distro for old hardware: https://www.linux.org/threads/ideal-distribution-for-old-pc.48442/
_________________
Forum Guidelines

PFL - Portage file list - find which package a file or command belongs to.
My delta-labs.org snippets do expire
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
szatox
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 27 Aug 2013
Posts: 3333

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Right now, my feeling is that desktop Linux is basically unsuitable for old-ish computers.
Could your choice of DE be a problem rather than the distribution? What desktop are you using?
GNOME and KDE aren't known for being small and lightweight.
There are alternatives though. I've been happily using LXDE since infamous KDE4 became a thing. Other options exist too.
_________________
Make Computing Fun Again
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pjp
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 20341

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 5:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Where do you go, when even Gentoo isn't enough? Reply with quote

lars_the_bear wrote:
Is there any practical way to run Linux on a ten-year-old computer these days?
The issue isn't a 10 year old computer. Mine works just fine. I don't think a new-ish laptop would work well with Gentoo given the amount of compiling, but that's just me. Is there really no used PC hardware in your area that you could use to build the binaries? I wouldn't expect that to cost too much for something in the last 5 years or so.
_________________
Quis separabit? Quo animo?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John R. Graham
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 10645
Location: Somewhere over Atlanta, Georgia

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 6:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Asked & answered in another thread, I think.

- John
_________________
I can confirm that I have received between 0 and 499 National Security Letters.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pjp
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 20341

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 7:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, but now "he has to" in order to meet his requirements. Especially if he is unwilling to compromise on USE flags for some of the bigger packages. I also suspect if he provided output on the issues with incompatible USE flags, some would be resolvable in favor of using the binary.

And spending a little allows him to continue to use old hardware. It seems like a reasonable compromise.
_________________
Quis separabit? Quo animo?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wjb
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Posts: 622
Location: Fife, Scotland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 10:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It depends how many Lenovos you have, but using Nx PCs with distcc will build about ~N times as fast as one by itself. So, build on one (with distcc and FEATURES="buildpkg") and share the PKGDIR with the drones.

My Dell Inspiron from 2007, with a glorious 2G RAM is still alive because it has a twin VM running on a newer (14 years) machine to manage the heavy lifting for it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
C5ace
Guru
Guru


Joined: 23 Dec 2013
Posts: 483
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lars_the_bear:

Try Calculate Linux 'calculate-linux.org'. This is complied Gentoo. They have KDE, Cinnamon, LXQt, MATE and Xfce Desktops. I used the XFCE Desktop yn the past on a 15 year old HP Laptop.
_________________
Observation after 30 years working with computers:
All software has known and unknown bugs and vulnerabilities. Especially software written in complex, unstable and object oriented languages such as perl, python, C++, C#, Rust and the likes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmpogo
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 02 Sep 2004
Posts: 3362
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am a bit surprised that you can't make laptops that flew 2015 Fedora to work - what are your specs ? I am running Gentoo on 2007 Core 2 Duo / 4GB RAM desktop (compiling everything except browsers) quite OK.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John R. Graham
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 10645
Location: Somewhere over Atlanta, Georgia

PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2024 12:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's been my experience as well. I have such a machine, a Core 2 Quad, albeit with 8GiB of RAM, running as my main home server. Its BIOS has a 2010 date. I compile everything.

- John
_________________
I can confirm that I have received between 0 and 499 National Security Letters.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rab0171610
Guru
Guru


Joined: 24 Dec 2022
Posts: 404

PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2024 1:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

We got a Lenovo IdeaPad 1i a few years back on Black Friday for 99 USD. It has an Intel Celeron N4020 Processor (1.10 GHz, up to 2.80 GHz Burst, 2 Cores, 2 Threads, 4 MB Cache) and only 4gb RAM. We bypass the internal 128 GB eMMC and use a 1GB NVME drive connected via an NVME to USB adapter. We run KDE Plasma on it. Our main computer is the distcc provider. Other than that it sometimes does some of its own compiling. Major updates to KDE/QT, gcc, etc I remove the NVME drive and plug it directly into the main computer via the USB. I mount it and chroot into it.
When connected to the host computer to compile, I have lines preconfigured in make.conf for Makeopts (to match the hosts CPU), Features (to turn off distcc), and turn on the use of PORTAGE_TMPDIR. When finished, I comment and uncomment to change those three lines back to the way they were, exit, umount the file systems & drive and return it to the laptop it came from.
That has worked great for a few years and the laptop is actually pretty snappy and responsive for such a low-end, bare-bones system running a full featured DE. This week I finally set it up to use binaries. Out of approx 1000, maybe 700 or so could now default to binary packages.
So in my experience, almost anything can still run Gentoo with a full featured DE.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lars_the_bear
Guru
Guru


Joined: 05 Jun 2024
Posts: 377

PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2024 8:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi folks

Thank you for the replies, but I feel I probably haven't articulated the situation very well.

In a few months I will be retiring, after 40+ years in the IT industry. I want to have one, simple laptop computer, that I use for everything. I want to run Linux on it, because that's what I know. And because the alternatives are so unattractive. I don't care what kind of Linux it is, frankly -- I just want it to work, without much fiddling. Frankly, I want to have as little do do with computer fiddling as a I possibly can when I retire. But I do want to run particular applications, and they're all heavyweights.

I don't want to buy a new laptop, because I will have to be much more careful about my expenditure. The best I currently have is a 2015 Lenovo with 16Gb (non-expandable) RAM. It will run Ubuntu tolerably well if I switch from Gnome to XFce4 and strip out a load of cruft. Getting it to a workable state is rather difficult and time-consuming, and I know that if I updated Ubuntu, it would undo everything I've done to make it workable, and I'd have to do it all again. Fedora appears to run fine with XFce4 but, again, there's an awful lot of stuff running that I don't need (what's an 'evolution-data-server'??). The dependency sprawl with Fedora is so extensive that it's virtual impossible to remove anything that the default install includes. So, although I can use Fedora for basic stuff, just at the desktop it's using 8Gb of the 16Gb RAM. I can't run the software I want to use, in that state.

But currently this laptop is running Gentoo, and it's flying. But it's just starting its second day of compiling after an update. Right now it's stuck on qtwebengine, because I have USE=-pulseaudio. I haven't installed Pulse because it just uses resources and does nothing I need. Maybe I could override the USE selection and install the binary. But who knows whether it will work? Well, maybe somebody knows, but I don't. I've had variable success with this kind of thing.

I'm not just being fussy or pedantic in my choice of settings, I just want to install as minimal a Linux as I possibly can, to give my laptop a fighting chance of being able to run monster applications like FreeCAD and Darktable. And it can under Gentoo, as it never could under anything else, because I couldn't get enough memory free.

It blows my mind that somebody (rab0171610?) can run Gentoo on a laptop with 4Gb RAM. When I ran 'emerge @world' I was told in no uncertain terms that even my 16Gb wouldn't be enough, and I had to add swap. And the swap is actually in use, so I can't imagine how this process would have worked with 4Gb.

The fact that people report success with this kind of hardware makes me wonder what they're doing, and I'm not. I'm about 95% sure that Gentoo isn't going to work for me in the long term, which is why I raised this thread. But there's still a nagging suspicion that, if I did something different, maybe it would work.

Maybe running FreeCAD on a 2015 laptop without a load of fiddling is an unrealistic goal -- I just don't know.

BR, Lars.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
C5ace
Guru
Guru


Joined: 23 Dec 2013
Posts: 483
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2024 11:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

lars_the_bear wrote:
Hi folks

Thank you for the replies, but I feel I probably haven't articulated the situation very well.

In a few months I will be retiring, after 40+ years in the IT industry. I want to have one, simple laptop computer, that I use for everything. I want to run Linux on it, because that's what I know. And because the alternatives are so unattractive. I don't care what kind of Linux it is, frankly -- I just want it to work, without much fiddling. Frankly, I want to have as little do do with computer fiddling as a I possibly can when I retire. But I do want to run particular applications, and they're all heavyweights.

I don't want to buy a new laptop, because I will have to be much more careful about my expenditure. The best I currently have is a 2015 Lenovo with 16Gb (non-expandable) RAM. It will run Ubuntu tolerably well if I switch from Gnome to XFce4 and strip out a load of cruft. Getting it to a workable state is rather difficult and time-consuming, and I know that if I updated Ubuntu, it would undo everything I've done to make it workable, and I'd have to do it all again. Fedora appears to run fine with XFce4 but, again, there's an awful lot of stuff running that I don't need (what's an 'evolution-data-server'??). The dependency sprawl with Fedora is so extensive that it's virtual impossible to remove anything that the default install includes. So, although I can use Fedora for basic stuff, just at the desktop it's using 8Gb of the 16Gb RAM. I can't run the software I want to use, in that state.

But currently this laptop is running Gentoo, and it's flying. But it's just starting its second day of compiling after an update. Right now it's stuck on qtwebengine, because I have USE=-pulseaudio. I haven't installed Pulse because it just uses resources and does nothing I need. Maybe I could override the USE selection and install the binary. But who knows whether it will work? Well, maybe somebody knows, but I don't. I've had variable success with this kind of thing.

I'm not just being fussy or pedantic in my choice of settings, I just want to install as minimal a Linux as I possibly can, to give my laptop a fighting chance of being able to run monster applications like FreeCAD and Darktable. And it can under Gentoo, as it never could under anything else, because I couldn't get enough memory free.

It blows my mind that somebody (rab0171610?) can run Gentoo on a laptop with 4Gb RAM. When I ran 'emerge @world' I was told in no uncertain terms that even my 16Gb wouldn't be enough, and I had to add swap. And the swap is actually in use, so I can't imagine how this process would have worked with 4Gb.

The fact that people report success with this kind of hardware makes me wonder what they're doing, and I'm not. I'm about 95% sure that Gentoo isn't going to work for me in the long term, which is why I raised this thread. But there's still a nagging suspicion that, if I did something different, maybe it would work.

Maybe running FreeCAD on a 2015 laptop without a load of fiddling is an unrealistic goal -- I just don't know.

BR, Lars.


Lars:
Try Calculate Linux. This is 100% compiled Gentoo with a slightly different layout of the / file system structure. You can optionally use emerge to recompile with different USE flags. I installed today Calculate Linux XFCE with Firefox, Thunderbird, LibreOffice on a VirtualBox VM with 2GB RAM single CPU.
_________________
Observation after 30 years working with computers:
All software has known and unknown bugs and vulnerabilities. Especially software written in complex, unstable and object oriented languages such as perl, python, C++, C#, Rust and the likes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
szatox
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 27 Aug 2013
Posts: 3333

PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2024 12:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
It blows my mind that somebody (rab0171610?) can run Gentoo on a laptop with 4Gb RAM. When I ran 'emerge @world' I was told in no uncertain terms that even my 16Gb wouldn't be enough, and I had to add swap. And the swap is actually in use, so I can't imagine how this process would have worked with 4Gb.
I run Gentoo on a mini VPS with 1GB RAM and 20GB disk.
I did get somewhat creative to squeeze it in, but quite frankly the biggest trick is I don't use it for FreeCAD.

Still, this:
Quote:
The best I currently have is a 2015 Lenovo with 16Gb (non-expandable) RAM
16GB RAM doesn't look bad at all. I know there are people who rock boxes equipped with terabytes those days, but it is not the standard, and it won't be for a while :lol:
The biggest issue with laptops is their absolutely shitty cooling. They come with strong CPUs, which are easy to advertise, but as soon as you try actually using them, they get throttled to 20-30% of their theoretical performance. Honestly I don't know what to do about it; replacing the tiny fan with a proper cooler doesn't really seem viable.

Quote:
So, although I can use Fedora for basic stuff, just at the desktop it's using 8Gb of the 16Gb RAM
That's hard to believe.
My web browser with a few dozens of tabs can take a few GBs, but that's with a few dozens tabs open. 8GB for "just the desktop" is a lot.
Unless you're reading it wrong. Is this 8GB of RAM _actually_ used, or does this figure include caches and buffers? You know, those things are not necessary and will be dropped as soon as you run out of "free" (AKA "wasted") RAM, but kernel keeps them around in case it can speed things up for you without any extra cost.
_________________
Make Computing Fun Again
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lars_the_bear
Guru
Guru


Joined: 05 Jun 2024
Posts: 377

PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2024 12:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

C5ace wrote:

Try Calculate Linux. This is 100% compiled Gentoo with a slightly different layout of the / file system structure. You can optionally use emerge to recompile with different USE flags. I installed today Calculate Linux XFCE with Firefox, Thunderbird, LibreOffice on a VirtualBox VM with 2GB RAM single CPU.


Thanks. I did try it, briefly. The problem is that I couldn't make the installer use my pre-existing filesystem layout. I have 6Gb of my data on this laptop and, while it's backed up, it's an awful lot of data to restore, if I accidentally create a new filesystem on top of it. I suspect if I knew more about Calculate, I might be able to figure out how to install it in a safe way. It's on my to-do list.

BR, Lars.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Goverp
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 07 Mar 2007
Posts: 2115

PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2024 12:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lars_the_bear wrote:
...
When I ran 'emerge @world' I was told in no uncertain terms that even my 16Gb wouldn't be enough, and I had to add swap. And the swap is actually in use, so I can't imagine how this process would have worked with 4Gb.
...
Maybe running FreeCAD on a 2015 laptop without a load of fiddling is an unrealistic goal -- I just don't know.

I wonder if you're trying to compile qtwebengine. That ebuild (and chromium, and possibly other ebuilds that use the same web browser source) generates a warning if 2*<jobs> (where jobs is the "-j" parameter from make.conf) exceeds your available memory. That's because some of the humungeous compilations involved need 2 GB, and so if you try running in too many threads, it will run out of memory. While using swap will alleviate the memory limit, it will kill compiler performance, so you're far, far better off reducing -j. You probably don't want USE="jumbo-build" on qtwebengine (if it still works, it has a habit of being removed 'cos it Google broke it), or certainly not at high values of JUMBO_BUILD_LIMIT
Other things to avoid are the use of "-pipe" and using tmpfs for /var/tmp/portage (or equivalent as configured in make.conf). While they can improve portage performance on large systems, they consume memory, and in this case there ain't none to spare.

If you do want one of these big ebuilds, you may gain by switching from gcc to clang for them - clang seems to only need 1.5 GB per thread when compiling these monsters, though that of course require you to build clang and configure your Gentoo toolchain appropriately, which may be more effort than its worth. The wiki has details.

As to running FreeCAD, I think you might be asking a lot, though I've not played with it recently. One way to avoid the (presumably huge) compilations for that might be using their AppImage/Flatpack, which ever it is, though of course that will definitely not be optimised for your hardware, and will use its own versions of the libraries so carefully optimised by Gentoo.
_________________
Greybeard
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum