| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
nagmat84
Apprentice
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 294
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2024 10:55 am Post subject: Experiences with removing Xorg server on Wayland setup? |
 |
|
I migrated from Plasma/KDE 5 on X11 to Plase/KDE6 with Wayland. I also went the whole way and run SDDM in a Wayland session on top of KWin. (See https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/SDDM#KDE_Plasma_/_KWin.) I am wondering if it is possible to remove x11-base/xorg-server, x11-base/xorg-drivers and x11-drivers/* without breaking anything. I still new to run some non-Wayland-native application via the XWayland abstraction layer. Hence, I know that it won't be possible to get rid of all X libraries. But that is fine. I am just considering the idea to get rid of X11 as much as practically doable and sensible.
Has anybody any experiences with that? What needs to be done?
I had a quick look at the dependency graph on my system and it seems that x11-base/xorg-server is required by the following packages | Code: | media-libs/libglvnd (X ? x11-base/xorg-server[xvfb])
www-client/firefox (X ? x11-base/xorg-server[xvfb])
x11-base/xorg-drivers (input_devices_libinput ? >=x11-base/xorg-server-21.1[udev])
(video_cards_intel ? >=x11-base/xorg-server-21.1[-minimal])
x11-drivers/xf86-input-libinput (>=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20[xorg])
(x11-base/xorg-server)
x11-drivers/xf86-video-amdgpu (x11-base/xorg-server[-minimal])
(>=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20[xorg])
x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati (x11-base/xorg-server[-minimal])
(>=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20[xorg])
x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel (x11-base/xorg-server[-minimal])
(>=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20[xorg])
x11-misc/sddm (X ? x11-base/xorg-server) |
The drivers depend on the server, but that is expected. SDDM and Firefox have an X use flag, but both packages also support Wayland explicitly. So I guess, those applications should be fine, if compiled without X support. But then there is "media-libs/libglvnd" which requires xorg-server, if the X use flag is enabled. And there is a ton of other packages which use the X use flag. I assume that globally disabling the X use will fire back on me. Packages seem to use the X use flag in thee different ways:- (End-user) applications which use the X use flag to be run on top of X, but which are also happy with Wayland (such as SDDM, Firefox, LibreOffice, etc.)
- Libraries which use the X use flag to enable support for the X server but which is meaningless, if no X server is actually running
- Libraries which use the X use flag to provide X support for X application and which are still needed for XWayland
Only for the latter category, the X use flag is needed on a "pure" Wayland installation. (As pure as it gets.)
So my question basically boils down whether anybody has already investigated which packages still actually need the X use flag such that there is no loss of functionality under Wayland/XWayland. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dmpogo
Advocate
Joined: 02 Sep 2004
Posts: 3461
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2024 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| There is not that much if anything that needs X server, which Xwayland can provide a simulation of, but many packages need X libraries |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Desktop Environments
