Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
6.12 kernel PREEMPT_RT patch for intel iGP
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CaptainBlood
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 3998

PostPosted: Sun Dec 08, 2024 6:04 pm    Post subject: 6.12 kernel PREEMPT_RT patch for intel iGP Reply with quote

CachyOS github

Only required if you intend to do PREEMPT_RT

If migrating .config from an old PREEMPT_RT kernel, e.g. 6.11, please apply patch before
Code:
make oldconfig
in order to keep iGP configuration sane.

Strange feeling this may take a long time to reach kernel.org, if it ever does. :roll:

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
_________________
USE="-* ..." in /etc/portage/make.conf here, i.e. a countermeasure to portage implicit braces, belt & diaper paradigm
LT: "I've been doing a passable imitation of the Fontana di Trevi, except my medium is mucus. Sooo much mucus. "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaptainBlood
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 3998

PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2024 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

12.3 patch is 12.4 compatible.

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
_________________
USE="-* ..." in /etc/portage/make.conf here, i.e. a countermeasure to portage implicit braces, belt & diaper paradigm
LT: "I've been doing a passable imitation of the Fontana di Trevi, except my medium is mucus. Sooo much mucus. "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gentoopc
Guru
Guru


Joined: 25 Dec 2017
Posts: 413

PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 8:59 pm    Post subject: Re: 6.12 kernel PREEMPT_RT patch for intel iGP Reply with quote

CaptainBlood wrote:




Strange feeling this may take a long time to reach kernel.org, if it ever does.


this path does not lead to money, so it is not interesting to them. games, that is what Linux developers are currently focused on. there is money there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EliasFitzgerald
n00b
n00b


Joined: 06 Feb 2025
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Fri Feb 14, 2025 8:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It sounds like you're working with the PREEMPT_RT patch for real-time kernel performance on CachyOS. Keeping iGPU configurations stable during migration is crucial. Are you running into any specific issues with the patch application or kernel compilation? My brother is an indie game developer, and he frequently shares large game assets with his team. Filemail has made it incredibly easy for him to send high-quality textures, audio files, and project builds without any restrictions. It’s a game-changer for anyone working in game development!

Last edited by EliasFitzgerald on Mon Feb 24, 2025 1:10 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dominique_71
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 1940
Location: Switzerland (Romandie)

PostPosted: Fri Feb 14, 2025 3:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EliasFitzgerald wrote:
PREEMPT_RT patches can be slow, I hope it reaches kernel org soon!


The main users of these patches are the industry, and they don't seam to be into a hurry to integrate them into vanilla. They know how to patch a kernel... But these patches are still making their way into vanilla, one step at a time, and we can hope this will be completed in 1 year, or maybe 2 or 3 years, who knows.
_________________
"Confirm You are a robot." - the singularity
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dominique_71
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 1940
Location: Switzerland (Romandie)

PostPosted: Fri Feb 14, 2025 3:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also it was a discussion a few years ago into the linux audio community about the rt group of the cgroups. Some wanted to develop a solution for the jack software to be added into that rt cgroup when connecting to jack. This was never done, maybe because the kernel devs was saying they was not sure they want to keep that rt cgroup.

Which imply that, when RT_PREEMPT will be fully integrated into vanilla, it will make no use to maintain 2 concurrent systems to provide the same feature, and they will certainly remove the rt cgroup from the cgroups. If I am right, that imply the industry prefer RT_PREEMPT that is well tested and simpler (it just works without the need to configure it for every single software that use it), over the rt cgroup mechanism.
_________________
"Confirm You are a robot." - the singularity
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum