View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
scottro Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 13 Apr 2002 Posts: 141 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2002 2:49 am Post subject: installing without a /boot partition |
|
|
Would some kind soul remind me of how to do this (the mailing list archives seem to be down)
The trouble is, that if one doesn't make a separate /boot partition, emerge system fails, as Grub is looking for it. What is the workaround--is it in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask, or is that not there till later in the installation? (I don't need to install Grub, I'm actually booting from either RH's or FreeBSD's Grub, depending upon what I'm reinstalling at the time)
TIA
Scott |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pcgod n00b
Joined: 10 Apr 2002 Posts: 6 Location: Over there ------->
|
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2002 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, this solution worked for me... I dunno if it'll work for you though. I have seperate partitions for /, /usr, /home, and /var. I'm not a big fan of grub, so I decided to use lilo instead. Well, lilo wanted /boot to be either currently mounted, or in /etc/fstab. So, I copied all of the data out of /var, then remounted it as /boot, on top of the current /boot directory. Then emerged lilo. That went fine. Then I mounted it back to /var, copied all of that data into /boot, and moved /var's data back. I dunno what will happen when I have to upgrade lilo though. Probably not the solution you were looking for though _________________ -- PC^God -- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2002 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Y'know, that would work--put something in /boot and then move it out again.
I might try that--but there was a more elegant (if that's the proper word) solution, that simply eliminated the problem.
Thanks though, that's an interesting workaround
Scott |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Malakin Veteran
Joined: 14 Apr 2002 Posts: 1692 Location: Victoria BC Canada
|
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2002 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
When I installed Gentoo I created one / partition and nothing else, used grub and never had any problems.... I did a stage 1 install if that makes any difference. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D33T n00b
Joined: 15 Apr 2002 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2002 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I did a stage 2 install, used hda1 (2.5 gigs) for / (including /boot) didn't mount or create anything different. I did create the dir, but that was it.
I also have hda4 which is like 16 gigs mounted at /pub. Everything worked fine. Follow Gentoo's page instructions, but ignore/change the boot part as needed. I didn't make a new one, but everything worked. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scottro Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 13 Apr 2002 Posts: 141 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2002 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks guys--in the early Gentoo installs, I was able to do that--ignore the instructions about a boot partition. Then, somewhere, a few months ago, I ran into the mentioned problems with it--emerge system getting messed up, as grub was looking for a /boot partition.
The next install, I'll try leaving it out again and seeing what happens.
Thanks very very much
Scott |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lazlor Guest
|
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2002 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mkdir /mnt/gentoo/boot ? or /boot after you chroot
The directory existing is all I needed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|