View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
MADcow l33t
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Posts: 742 Location: RIT (Henrietta, New York, United States)
|
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2004 10:13 pm Post subject: LM_Sensors+2.6? |
|
|
yup. more 2.6 problems. has anyone gotten lm_sensors to work? 2.6 doesn't seem to have the i2c-proc module. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheCoop Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2002 Posts: 1814 Location: Where you least expect it
|
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2004 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=101573 _________________ 95% of all computer errors occur between chair and keyboard (TM)
"One World, One web, One program" - Microsoft Promo ad.
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Führer" - Adolf Hitler
Change the world - move a rock |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cobra n00b
Joined: 16 Sep 2003 Posts: 21 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2004 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kernel 2.6 has sensors support built-in. You don't need lm_sensors and they won't even work with 2.6. You can read data from the sensors from the /sys directory. GKrellM already supports it.
Unfortunately 2.6 has a bit outdated version of the lm_sensors drivers and my i2c controller isn't supported I hope they get the new version soon... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MADcow l33t
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Posts: 742 Location: RIT (Henrietta, New York, United States)
|
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanks. will try |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MADcow l33t
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Posts: 742 Location: RIT (Henrietta, New York, United States)
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2004 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
thanks. that works fine. but now my calculations in /etc/sensors.conf are useless :'(
thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MasterX Veteran
Joined: 26 Jun 2003 Posts: 1165
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2004 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
So, if I have kernel 2.6 I do not need to install lm_sensors. Interesting!!
What about superkaramba. Was anybody able to use sensors in superkaramba under 2.6 kernel. I believe superkaramba reads all the informations from /proc folder. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronmon Veteran
Joined: 15 Apr 2002 Posts: 1043 Location: Key West, FL
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2004 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You don't have to install lm_sensors, but you can if you want since v2.8.2 is in portage and supports 2.6.x kernels now. You do have to enter the full path to the ebuild to do it, though. It's under sys-apps/lm-sensors.
It will just install the userland apps if the modules are in your kernel. The reason I use it is so that I can adjust some things in sensors.conf. I run "sensors -s" in my local.start so that the settings take effect at boot time. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MasterX Veteran
Joined: 26 Jun 2003 Posts: 1165
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2004 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ronmon wrote: | You don't have to install lm_sensors, but you can if you want since v2.8.2 is in portage and supports 2.6.x kernels now. You do have to enter the full path to the ebuild to do it, though. It's under sys-apps/lm-sensors.
It will just install the userland apps if the modules are in your kernel. The reason I use it is so that I can adjust some things in sensors.conf. I run "sensors -s" in my local.start so that the settings take effect at boot time. |
This is what I am doing. I did not know that lm_sensor is optional |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|