Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Love5 - The Sardine Release
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jake
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Posts: 1132

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 2:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Safrax wrote:
What's do I need to do to get the reiserfs4 utils? The ebuilds on BMG are extremely old.

I installed libaal and reiser4progs from the source at http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/LATEST/. You'll need to ./prepare before you ./configure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
discomfitor
l33t
l33t


Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 927
Location: None

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 3:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just downloaded/compiled/installed, and everything is working well so far. One thing that you might want to change is the fact that the EXTRAVERSION in the highest level makefile is still -mm4 and not -love5.
_________________
There is no substitute for experience.
Imperfection indicates a lack of effort.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steel300
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 3:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I forgot to change that with the new patch. Thanks for pointing that out.
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steel300
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 3:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I fixed the extraversion. Sorry about that.
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chocoba65
n00b
n00b


Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Posts: 33

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 5:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Safrax wrote:
What's do I need to do to get the reiserfs4 utils? The ebuilds on BMG are extremely old.

http://wedge.xwlegacy.net/reiser4progs.tar.bz2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MG-Cloud
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 200

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 5:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey, been out of the loop a bit recently due to a load of homework ... I've been looking at the stuff included in this release of love-sources and found that it includes reiser4 support. While I'd like to experiment with this, I don't have the time at the moment, and I use reiser3. Does this patchset break support for reiser3, or should everything be ok?

Thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steel300
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 6:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It won't have any effect on the normal reiserfs. Reiser4 and reiserfs are completely seperate entities.

After extensive testing, reiser4 seems to be stable. It can handle large files, small files, mounting, and unmounting.
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ares
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 13 Oct 2003
Posts: 280
Location: Savigliano (CN)

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 9:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi
I have compiled kernel 2.6.1 with love5 and gcc 3.4
New version gcc causes error

CC fs/reiserfs/fix_node.o
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c: In function `free_buffers_in_tb':
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:733: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:735: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:737: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:739: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:741: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:743: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c: In function `get_far_parent':
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1005: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1027: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c: In function `get_parents':
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1064: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1065: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1066: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1067: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1091: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1093: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1119: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1122: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c: In function `get_neighbors':
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1916: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1930: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1949: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h:1837: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'decrement_bcount': function body not available
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1953: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
make[2]: *** [fs/reiserfs/fix_node.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [fs/reiserfs] Error 2
make: *** [fs] Error 2


Solution ?
_________________
My portage and homepage
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fca
Guru
Guru


Joined: 22 Feb 2003
Posts: 346
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 11:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Need the following patch for love5 to compile with gcc 3.4:

http://fca.shacknet.nu/files/kernel-gcc34-inline-fix.patch

Should apply clean.

Fix for reiser4 with gcc 3.4:
http://fca.shacknet.nu/files/reiser4-fix-gcc34-inline.patch

Could somebody with an older compiler (gcc 3.3 and 3.2) also test these patches? I don't know if it breaks anything, or make the kernel slower...


Last edited by fca on Sat Jan 17, 2004 11:29 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ares
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 13 Oct 2003
Posts: 280
Location: Savigliano (CN)

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 11:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thx for patch
_________________
My portage and homepage
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheCoop
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 15 Jun 2002
Posts: 1814
Location: Where you least expect it

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 11:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

testing compile of the two patches on a 3.3.2 system now, will report back when done
_________________
95% of all computer errors occur between chair and keyboard (TM)

"One World, One web, One program" - Microsoft Promo ad.
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Führer" - Adolf Hitler

Change the world - move a rock
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheCoop
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 15 Jun 2002
Posts: 1814
Location: Where you least expect it

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 11:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am happy to say that the two patches compile relatively cleanly on gcc-3.3.2-r5, glibc-2.3.3_pre20031222-r0, 2.6.1-love5
_________________
95% of all computer errors occur between chair and keyboard (TM)

"One World, One web, One program" - Microsoft Promo ad.
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Führer" - Adolf Hitler

Change the world - move a rock
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ares
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 13 Oct 2003
Posts: 280
Location: Savigliano (CN)

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 11:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Compiled success with patch.....
New errors in snd-emu10k1

*{root}@{hiawatha}:[ares] * modprobe snd-emu10k1
WARNING: Error inserting snd_timer (/lib/modules/2.6.1-love5/kernel/sound/core/snd-timer.ko): Invalid argument
WARNING: Error inserting snd_pcm (/lib/modules/2.6.1-love5/kernel/sound/core/snd-pcm.ko): Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg)
FATAL: Error inserting snd_emu10k1 (/lib/modules/2.6.1-love5/kernel/sound/pci/emu10k1/snd-emu10k1.ko): Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg)
_________________
My portage and homepage
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
grzewho
l33t
l33t


Joined: 31 Dec 2002
Posts: 626
Location: /home/g

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 12:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

works perfectly for me. lirc, v4l, mounting cdroms, elevator=cfq, bootsplash etc.

built with gcc version 3.3.2 20031218 (Gentoo Linux 3.3.2-r5, propolice-3.3-7)

THX for the patch !!
_________________
Code:
USE="freedom -software_patents" emerge --deep --update world
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OneOfOne
Guru
Guru


Joined: 28 May 2003
Posts: 368

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 12:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ares wrote:
Compiled success with patch.....
New errors in snd-emu10k1

*{root}@{hiawatha}:[ares] * modprobe snd-emu10k1
WARNING: Error inserting snd_timer (/lib/modules/2.6.1-love5/kernel/sound/core/snd-timer.ko): Invalid argument
WARNING: Error inserting snd_pcm (/lib/modules/2.6.1-love5/kernel/sound/core/snd-pcm.ko): Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg)
FATAL: Error inserting snd_emu10k1 (/lib/modules/2.6.1-love5/kernel/sound/pci/emu10k1/snd-emu10k1.ko): Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg)

notice the modules you get errors with while doing make modules_install, and make them all built in.
this is the only solution i know for now.

peace
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asimon
l33t
l33t


Joined: 27 Jun 2002
Posts: 979
Location: Germany, Old Europe

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 1:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Code:

  LD      crypto/built-in.o
  CC [M]  crypto/crypto_null.o
  CC [M]  crypto/md4.o
  CC [M]  crypto/md5.o
  CC [M]  crypto/sha1.o
  CC [M]  crypto/sha256.o
  CC [M]  crypto/sha512.o
  CC [M]  crypto/des.o
  CC [M]  crypto/blowfish.o
  CC [M]  crypto/twofish.o
  CC [M]  crypto/serpent.o
  CC [M]  crypto/aes.o
  CC [M]  crypto/cast5.o
  CC [M]  crypto/cast6.o
  CC [M]  crypto/deflate.o
  CC [M]  crypto/ucl_compress.o
In file included from /usr/include/features.h:295,
                 from /usr/include/limits.h:26,
                 from include/ucl/uclconf.h:46,
                 from include/ucl/ucl.h:39,
                 from crypto/ucl_compress.c:22:
/usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:183:1: warning: "__attribute_pure__" redefined
In file included from include/linux/compiler.h:16,
                 from include/linux/init.h:5,
                 from crypto/ucl_compress.c:19:
include/linux/compiler-gcc3.h:22:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
In file included from /usr/include/features.h:295,
                 from /usr/include/limits.h:26,
                 from include/ucl/uclconf.h:46,
                 from include/ucl/ucl.h:39,
                 from crypto/ucl_compress.c:22:
/usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:192:1: warning: "__attribute_used__" redefined
In file included from include/linux/compiler.h:16,
                 from include/linux/init.h:5,
                 from crypto/ucl_compress.c:19:
include/linux/compiler-gcc3.h:17:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
cp /usr/lib/libucl.a crypto/
cp: cannot stat `/usr/lib/libucl.a': No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [crypto/libucl.a] Error 1
make: *** [crypto] Error 2


I have no /usr/lib/libucl.a installed. Looks like the love-sources misses some dependancy. It's a general kernel problem. Some kernel-space modules nowadays seem to depend on user-space libs. Sigh!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mile_slo
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 91
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 2:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yes, mount /mnt/cdrom works again :)


thanks steel300
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fschneider
n00b
n00b


Joined: 07 Nov 2003
Posts: 13

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 2:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hi,

I am just compiling the revised love5 sources, but I have found
two issues:

1. the bt87x recording patch is missing (it has been in the original patch, though)
2. drivers/scsi/sr fails to compile. the following patch fixes it:

--- drivers/scsi/sr.c 2004-01-17 10:44:19.773744944 +0100
+++ ../linux-2.6.1-love2/drivers/scsi/sr.c 2004-01-10 19:23:18.000000000 +0100
@@ -798,6 +798,7 @@
if ((buffer[n + 3] & 0x20) == 0) {
/* can't write DVD-RAM media */
cd->cdi.mask |= CDC_DVD_RAM;
+ }
if ((buffer[n + 3] & 0x10) == 0)
/* can't write DVD-R media */
cd->cdi.mask |= CDC_DVD_R;
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chaosite
Guru
Guru


Joined: 13 Dec 2003
Posts: 540
Location: Right over here.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 2:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can you put the drivers for the ACX100 (wireless card) in love-sources?

It's not exactly a patch per se, but I'll make one out of it if you would put it in.

It's at acx100.sourceforge.net.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ed0n
l33t
l33t


Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 638
Location: Prishtine/Kosove

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

fschneider wrote:
hi,

I am just compiling the revised love5 sources, but I have found
two issues:

1. the bt87x recording patch is missing (it has been in the original patch, though)
2. drivers/scsi/sr fails to compile. the following patch fixes it:

--- drivers/scsi/sr.c 2004-01-17 10:44:19.773744944 +0100
+++ ../linux-2.6.1-love2/drivers/scsi/sr.c 2004-01-10 19:23:18.000000000 +0100
@@ -798,6 +798,7 @@
if ((buffer[n + 3] & 0x20) == 0) {
/* can't write DVD-RAM media */
cd->cdi.mask |= CDC_DVD_RAM;
+ }
if ((buffer[n + 3] & 0x10) == 0)
/* can't write DVD-R media */
cd->cdi.mask |= CDC_DVD_R;

I was crying for this :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ares
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 13 Oct 2003
Posts: 280
Location: Savigliano (CN)

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok......resolve my problem for module snd-emu10k1

make menuconfig
<*> Advanced Linux Sound Architecture
<M> Sequencer support
[*] OSS API emulation
<*> OSS PCM (digital audio) API
[*] OSS Sequencer API


Launch kmix for adjust audio level's....click Avanced and remove Audigy Analog/Digital Output Jack
_________________
My portage and homepage
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PrakashP
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 1249
Location: C.C.A.A., Germania

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 3:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Could someone with nforce2 please test the following with this love kernel:

copy a 500+ MB file from CD to HD

Does it lock up? It did for me with mm4 (two tried) and it locked up at other points, as well. So this release is a no go for me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OneOfOne
Guru
Guru


Joined: 28 May 2003
Posts: 368

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 3:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

asimon wrote:
Code:

  LD      crypto/built-in.o
  CC [M]  crypto/crypto_null.o
  CC [M]  crypto/md4.o
  CC [M]  crypto/md5.o
  CC [M]  crypto/sha1.o
  CC [M]  crypto/sha256.o
  CC [M]  crypto/sha512.o
  CC [M]  crypto/des.o
  CC [M]  crypto/blowfish.o
  CC [M]  crypto/twofish.o
  CC [M]  crypto/serpent.o
  CC [M]  crypto/aes.o
  CC [M]  crypto/cast5.o
  CC [M]  crypto/cast6.o
  CC [M]  crypto/deflate.o
  CC [M]  crypto/ucl_compress.o
In file included from /usr/include/features.h:295,
                 from /usr/include/limits.h:26,
                 from include/ucl/uclconf.h:46,
                 from include/ucl/ucl.h:39,
                 from crypto/ucl_compress.c:22:
/usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:183:1: warning: "__attribute_pure__" redefined
In file included from include/linux/compiler.h:16,
                 from include/linux/init.h:5,
                 from crypto/ucl_compress.c:19:
include/linux/compiler-gcc3.h:22:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
In file included from /usr/include/features.h:295,
                 from /usr/include/limits.h:26,
                 from include/ucl/uclconf.h:46,
                 from include/ucl/ucl.h:39,
                 from crypto/ucl_compress.c:22:
/usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:192:1: warning: "__attribute_used__" redefined
In file included from include/linux/compiler.h:16,
                 from include/linux/init.h:5,
                 from crypto/ucl_compress.c:19:
include/linux/compiler-gcc3.h:17:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
cp /usr/lib/libucl.a crypto/
cp: cannot stat `/usr/lib/libucl.a': No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [crypto/libucl.a] Error 1
make: *** [crypto] Error 2


I have no /usr/lib/libucl.a installed. Looks like the love-sources misses some dependancy. It's a general kernel problem. Some kernel-space modules nowadays seem to depend on user-space libs. Sigh!

this is for compress-loop (gcloop), you need to emerge dev-libs/ucl.

peace
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fca
Guru
Guru


Joined: 22 Feb 2003
Posts: 346
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 3:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PrakashKC wrote:
Could someone with nforce2 please test the following with this love kernel:

copy a 500+ MB file from CD to HD

Does it lock up? It did for me with mm4 (two tried) and it locked up at other points, as well. So this release is a no go for me.


Did it, and succeeded. Didn't try with mm4, maybe I will do that tomorrow or so.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Corp.Nobbs
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 02 Oct 2003
Posts: 112
Location: Reading, UK

PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 3:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, whats the score with gcc3.4? Currently I'm on 3.2.3. Firstly I'm a bit of a pussy went it comes to upgrading these sorts of core things. What impact if any would it make to the rest of my system i.e. should I emerge -U system/world after upgrading gcc? What's the benefit e.g. a faster kernel?
The other thing is that I've just emerge sync'ed and can't see gcc3.4 anyway (not it /usr/portage/sys-devel/gcc that is) :?:
_________________
Asus A8V
AMD64 3500+
1GB XMS3200C2 Pro
120GB Barracuda SATA
Geforce 3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 2 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum