View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dponch n00b
Joined: 25 Nov 2003 Posts: 28 Location: somewhere in Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 12:56 pm Post subject: Connecting Win2k computer to Gentoo server |
|
|
Hello,
I would like to access a gentoo server with a win2k machine. I will have several partitions (on gentoo) which will share the data's (for the windows). But I wonder which FS I have to use for better performance? Someone said I'd use reiserfs ... but is this will cause some troubles with windows? What's the good deal?
Thanks,
Dams _________________ never give up 'til the bell rings ... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fleed l33t
Joined: 28 Aug 2002 Posts: 756 Location: London
|
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you're talking about partitions on the same machine then I think you're stuck with using e2fs. I think that's the only partition type that has support available in NT. You'll have to install drivers for it though (google and sf.net)
If you're talking about two different machines (which is not really clear from your post) then the FS you choose does not matter. You'll simply have to use samba to be able to make the win machine see the data on the gentoo one. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dponch n00b
Joined: 25 Nov 2003 Posts: 28 Location: somewhere in Belgium
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes I have two different machines.
The first one: Gentoo server which contains the partitions to share
The second one: Win2k Client which will connect to Gentoo and take data from the server
So in my case, it doesn't matter the FS on the Gentoo server? If I understand.
But how the win2k will be able to see the data if the server partitions are in ext2 or reiserfs? I don't understand this very well.
Thanks again
PS: Sorry if it wasn't clear enough, I'm not used to write in English :p _________________ never give up 'til the bell rings ... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scotty49 Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 14 May 2003 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hello!
When data is transmitted through the network, it is "transformed" to another file system, i. e. the samba file system, no matter, which file system is originally on the partition you want to share. In Win2k this is the standard networking file system, so you don't have to change anything on that PC. Using gentoo you should
Code: | emerge net-fs/samba |
and configure it according to your needs. Then your Win2k box will be able to access the gentoo system via the normal network neighborhood and vice versa.
Hope this helps,
Scotty |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mitzi n00b
Joined: 16 Dec 2003 Posts: 45 Location: Cheshire, UK
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
dponch wrote: | YSo in my case, it doesn't matter the FS on the Gentoo server? If I understand.
But how the win2k will be able to see the data if the server partitions are in ext2 or reiserfs? I don't understand this very well. |
Use Samba on the Gentoo machine and the shares will appear in Network Neighboorhood as regular Windows shares - Windows wont know the difference! Samba hides the underlying file system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fleed l33t
Joined: 28 Aug 2002 Posts: 756 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, you need to install samba on your gentoo server and connect to it through the network from your windows xp machine. What filesystem you have on your gentoo server is of no consequence (as far as the windows machine goes) since samba is doing the sharing of the data.
So:
Gentoo == samba <<===>> windows
EXT2 <-------'
XFS <--------'
reiser <-------'
Hope that makes it clear! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jaska Bodhisattva
Joined: 06 Jun 2003 Posts: 725 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Since you have two computers it doesn't make any difference if you use ReiserFS, ext2, ext3, jfs, or xfs as your file system on the gentoo box. Just use Samba or NFS to share data, should work fine. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fleed l33t
Joined: 28 Aug 2002 Posts: 756 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ouch! My response was beaten by two in 1 minute. Such is the eagerness to help of the good gentooers! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dponch n00b
Joined: 25 Nov 2003 Posts: 28 Location: somewhere in Belgium
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't hope so much answers ) Well now I know!!
So another question for win2k.
Do you know some good websites where I can find information about startup scripts?
I would like to mount shared directories at windows startup ...
Once again, thanks everybody _________________ never give up 'til the bell rings ... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fleed l33t
Joined: 28 Aug 2002 Posts: 756 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In a command prompt in windows type net help and it will give you some help. I think you're looking for Code: | NET USE [devicename | *] [\\computername\sharename | (from net help use).
So if you want drive E to be assigned to \\server\shareddir you create a script with Code: | net use e: \\server\sharedir |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
DopeGhoti Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 17 Jan 2004 Posts: 100 Location: Vermont, US
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And to make it automagic across reboots: Code: | net use e: \\server\share /persistent:yes |
_________________ A proud member of the No post left unanswered Club! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
compuboy86 Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 Apr 2003 Posts: 79
|
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 4:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
To go back a question (sorry!) I recommend using FAT32 for the share partitions. Before flamming me, I prefer to use FAT32 for the sole reason that I may have to move my raid array into a windows computer, which would not work so well if the FS was reiserfs. In my experience, FAT32 is fine for a low to moderate use file server which supports writing to from both windows and linux.
However, if using the partition in Windows is not an issue....go with reiser, best journaling FS that I've tried. (JFS borked on me once...never again) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|