| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
metalh34d
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
Posts: 126
|
 Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:13 am Post subject: ck patch and love patch |
 |
|
| How do these two patches compare? I saw words on the ck patch having very cool code put in to appreciate hyper threading with. On the other hand love sources are suppose to be cutting edge with top performance. Basically I want to figure out if its more beneficial for my P4 2.4C to use Con's latest patch or to give love sources a swing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
steel300
Veteran
Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:18 am Post subject: Re: ck patch and love patch |
|
|
| metalh34d wrote: | | How do these two patches compare? I saw words on the ck patch having very cool code put in to appreciate hyper threading with. On the other hand love sources are suppose to be cutting edge with top performance. Basically I want to figure out if its more beneficial for my P4 2.4C to use Con's latest patch or to give love sources a swing. |
The best thing you can do is to try both and see which one you like better. Some people are avidly against love-sources, and some don't like Con's patchset. It's really your decision. The best advice I can give is to test out both and see.
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shm
Advocate
Joined: 09 Dec 2002
Posts: 2380
Location: Atlanta, Universe
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 4:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Agreed.. it only takes 15 mins to compile a kernel, why not try both? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cerement
Guru
Joined: 14 Jun 2003
Posts: 404
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
metalh34d
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
Posts: 126
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 7:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Redeeman
l33t
Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 958
Location: Portugal
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i *think* cons might be faster on ht cpu's, but not sure, personally i use nicks scheduling policies, but i have amd, i will say, try both and use what you find best too |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Kernel & Hardware
