View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
btned n00b
Joined: 09 Feb 2004 Posts: 23 Location: Arlington, TX
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2004 7:39 pm Post subject: Mounting windows drives with samba |
|
|
hi all,
I am running kernel 2.6 and wondering if I have to include kernel level support for samba if I want to mount windows drives. I have already emerged samba. It would be very nice if somebody could post the steps needed to mount samba drives.
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
|
adaptr Watchman
Joined: 06 Oct 2002 Posts: 6730 Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2004 7:51 pm Post subject: Re: Mounting windows drives with samba |
|
|
btned wrote: | hi all,
I am running kernel 2.6 and wondering if I have to include kernel level support for samba if I want to mount windows drives. |
Yes.
btned wrote: | I have already emerged samba. |
The samba package is not needed to use a windows share over the network.
Smbfs is a network filesystem built right into the kernel, like nfs.
btned wrote: | It would be very nice if somebody could post the steps needed to mount samba drives.
Thanks |
Code: | mount -t smbfs //hostname/sharename /mount/point
|
man mount for the smb options to provide a username etc. _________________ >>> emerge (3 of 7) mcse/70-293 to /
Essential tools: gentoolkit eix profuse screen |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mvbv-linux n00b
Joined: 15 Dec 2003 Posts: 50 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2004 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I had a problem regarding this. As long as I hadn't done an emerge of samba, I couldn't mount windows shares (support of smb in kernel activated). After emerging, everything went ok...
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=129003&highlight=
So I'm pretty sure now that you'll have to have samba on your box if you want to use mount -t smfs.
As vdboor said (check the thread above) :
Quote: | To mount a smb share, the mount command calls mount.smbfs somewhere... and this doesn't exist until you install samba |
I think he was right... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
btned n00b
Joined: 09 Feb 2004 Posts: 23 Location: Arlington, TX
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2004 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you,
I am able to mount the drives using smbmount. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
adaptr Watchman
Joined: 06 Oct 2002 Posts: 6730 Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2004 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mvbv-linux wrote: | I had a problem regarding this. As long as I hadn't done an emerge of samba, I couldn't mount windows shares (support of smb in kernel activated). After emerging, everything went ok...
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=129003&highlight=
So I'm pretty sure now that you'll have to have samba on your box if you want to use mount -t smfs.
As vdboor said (check the thread above) :
Quote: | To mount a smb share, the mount command calls mount.smbfs somewhere... and this doesn't exist until you install samba |
I think he was right... |
Which makes me wonder what the smbfs support in the kernel actually does. _________________ >>> emerge (3 of 7) mcse/70-293 to /
Essential tools: gentoolkit eix profuse screen |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mvbv-linux n00b
Joined: 15 Dec 2003 Posts: 50 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I wonder too...
Maybe having a look in the sources will bring us some answers.
Somebody already posted this questions somewhere else :
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/9509/0058.html
But never got any answer ! (Btw, check the date of the message ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dont know anything n00b
Joined: 13 Jun 2003 Posts: 60
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
As far as i know smbfs suport in kernel adds just that.
Ever tried mountig it without? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|