Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
CORBA error: BAD_OPERATION when nautilus / mrproject starts
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours
View posts from last 7 days

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Desktop Environments
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ct
n00b
n00b


Joined: 22 Jul 2002
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2002 7:24 am    Post subject: CORBA error: BAD_OPERATION when nautilus / mrproject starts Reply with quote

When nautilus starts I get the following error:
Code:
Configuration server couldn't be contacted:
 CORBA error: IDL:omg.org/CORBA/BAD_OPERATION:1.0


This error gets shown in 4 separate windows. Nautilus starts (and works fine) anyhow. I get the same error with mrproject but not with gnumeric.

Installed versions: nautilus 2.0.4, mrproject 0.6, gnumeric 1.0.8

Somewhere it was mentioned to look for gconfd that remains running after all gnome applications are exited. And in fact when I kill /usr/bin/gconfd-1 7 manually before starting nautilus I do not get this error.

I use xfce and have my everyday applications started automatically (and do not close them when exiting X).

I found these threads that would not solve my problem:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=12889
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=12874: suggest killing gconfd; removing .gnome[2] (did not help); unmerging openldap (did not help - earlier I had it not installed, now dev-libs/openssl , sys-apps/tcp-wrappers , sys-libs/ncurses depend on (?) openldap as revealed by dependencies.sh (https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=8453)).

In 12874 this thread is mentioned https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=6139

A search in Google didn't help neither.


Last edited by ct on Wed Sep 18, 2002 4:18 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
damodred
n00b
n00b


Joined: 24 Jul 2002
Posts: 26
Location: Moenchengladbach / Germany

PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2002 12:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,

I have exactly the same problem you have mentioned, all the other threads related to similar problems didn't help me to solve the problem!

A few weeks ago I installed my system totally new, before this I had a similar configuration and I had not this problem with nautilus, now with the reinstalled system and really similar configuration (enlightenment and nautilus as directory manager, without whole gnome emerged) I get this annoying error sometimes I start nautilus (other gnome tools produce the same error but only AFTER I got the error starting nautilus)! So I think it has something to do with Nautilus and the gconf system.

Hope anyone can help with this problem!

damodred
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
charlieg
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 30 Jul 2002
Posts: 2149
Location: Manchester UK

PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2002 2:23 pm    Post subject: Potential fix? Reply with quote

I had this problem too, but I just went through an "emerge -u world" and it has... gone away?

Also I might suggest "emerge gnome-terminal multi-gnome-terminal" as they are not automatically done with an emerge gnome.
_________________
Want Free games?
Free Gamer - open source games list & commentary

Open source web-enabled rich UI platform: Vexi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
damodred
n00b
n00b


Joined: 24 Jul 2002
Posts: 26
Location: Moenchengladbach / Germany

PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay my problem with nautilus is solved!

I used evolution as mail client, after several reboots I could reproduce the error:
- start of enlightenment
- start of my I-net connection
- evolution
- nautilus
this gave me constant the errors mentioned above

But not starting evolution was the solution! I can start any application in any order, nautilus will never fail! Only when I start Nautilus after evolution I get these silly errors...

emerge gconf or emerge -C evolution + emerge evolution didn't help to solve this, so I emerged sylpheed-claw as e-mail client!
And after a few days I can say that I never got the above mentioned errors again...

It would be interesting what is going wrong with evolution, before my reinstall of the system I didn't get these strange errors with evolution...

bye,
damodred
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ct
n00b
n00b


Joined: 22 Jul 2002
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2002 10:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gone. The error does not show anymore.

I cannot for sure tell what solved the problem, my best guess is that
Code:
emerge control-center
now in version 2.0.1.1 solved the problem.

Anyhow - what I have also emerged recently (might had their influence on the problem?):
nautilus (2.0.7) and many dependecies that came with it
baselayout (1.8.3)
scrollkeeper (0.3.11-r1)
gnome-terminal and multi-gnome-terminal
portage (2.0.37)

The suggestion emerge -u world finally lead to me to this solution. It did not show any useful information though with my previously installed portage. Only after I have upgraded from portage 2.0.13 to portage 2.0.37 an "emerge -p world | grep U" did show me packages that could be updated.

Thank you for your answers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
paul138
Guru
Guru


Joined: 09 Aug 2002
Posts: 370
Location: Ottawa, ON

PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2002 3:28 pm    Post subject: Simple Reply with quote

For me the solution was much more simple than rebuilding. Create a link from /usr/libexec/gconfd-2 in /usr/bin

Fixed. :roll:
_________________
Talk is cheap because supply always exceeds demand.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kappax
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 30 Aug 2002
Posts: 273
Location: The Moon

PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2002 10:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Simple Reply with quote

paul138 wrote:
For me the solution was much more simple than rebuilding. Create a link from /usr/libexec/gconfd-2 in /usr/bin

Fixed. :roll:



wow that worked and was ez!!!


THANKS
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
paul138
Guru
Guru


Joined: 09 Aug 2002
Posts: 370
Location: Ottawa, ON

PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2002 1:34 pm    Post subject: Re: Simple Reply with quote

kappax wrote:

wow that worked and was ez!!!
THANKS


NP. It's very interesting though, if you make a new user and use gnome as thier wm you can run gnome without this link.

I think this one is bugzilla-bound.
Off to the bug base... :D
_________________
Talk is cheap because supply always exceeds demand.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pilla
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 07 Aug 2002
Posts: 7729
Location: Underworld

PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2002 1:21 am    Post subject: Re: Simple++ Reply with quote

Didn' t work for me, but this works

Code:

/usr/bin/gconfigtool-2 --spawn


it creates an instance of the gconfd-2. If you run it twice, it won' t create one more daemon.

paul138 wrote:
kappax wrote:

wow that worked and was ez!!!
THANKS


NP. It's very interesting though, if you make a new user and use gnome as thier wm you can run gnome without this link.

I think this one is bugzilla-bound.
Off to the bug base... :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
paul138
Guru
Guru


Joined: 09 Aug 2002
Posts: 370
Location: Ottawa, ON

PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2002 1:43 pm    Post subject: Filed Reply with quote

The resolution via the bug report I filed was to exit X all together and run oaf-slay, edit the .xinitrc and change window managers.

I was because (in my case) I was running fluxbox and using Galeon (Gnome 1.x) which started gconfd-1. Then Gnome 2x apps would crash because they were using gconfd-1 instead of gconfd2.
_________________
Talk is cheap because supply always exceeds demand.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
joycea
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 23 Jul 2002
Posts: 191
Location: Kingston, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 12:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can continue using fluxbox, just start the gconfd-2 daemon before doing anything else (ie. in your xinitrc)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
paul138
Guru
Guru


Joined: 09 Aug 2002
Posts: 370
Location: Ottawa, ON

PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 4:03 pm    Post subject: Hmm Reply with quote

Which would be fine except that gconfd will die if not used for a period of time. :wink:
_________________
Talk is cheap because supply always exceeds demand.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
joycea
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 23 Jul 2002
Posts: 191
Location: Kingston, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 4:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting... after starting gconfd-2 before evolution my comp has run fine all day with no error boxes. Before that I would get an error whenever I started evolution. After investigating though ps lists the gconf I started awhile ago as a zombie process. I don't know what's happened, maybe it's just my lucky day so far.

Do you think running gconfd-2 just before I run nautilus each time might be a more permanent solution?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crimson
Guru
Guru


Joined: 27 Apr 2002
Posts: 430
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA

PostPosted: Wed Feb 26, 2003 4:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My problem is very similar, if I run gnome-terminal before I run galeon, I'm ok. But if I run galeon before running gnome-terminal "CORBA ERROR, 1.0 blabla".

So what is a good fix for this? I don't want to have to kill gconfd-1 everytime I want to run a terminal, or I don't want to have to make sure I run terminal first everytime I want to use Galeon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Desktop Environments All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum