View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ct n00b
Joined: 22 Jul 2002 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2002 7:24 am Post subject: CORBA error: BAD_OPERATION when nautilus / mrproject starts |
|
|
When nautilus starts I get the following error:
Code: | Configuration server couldn't be contacted:
CORBA error: IDL:omg.org/CORBA/BAD_OPERATION:1.0 |
This error gets shown in 4 separate windows. Nautilus starts (and works fine) anyhow. I get the same error with mrproject but not with gnumeric.
Installed versions: nautilus 2.0.4, mrproject 0.6, gnumeric 1.0.8
Somewhere it was mentioned to look for gconfd that remains running after all gnome applications are exited. And in fact when I kill /usr/bin/gconfd-1 7 manually before starting nautilus I do not get this error.
I use xfce and have my everyday applications started automatically (and do not close them when exiting X).
I found these threads that would not solve my problem:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=12889
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=12874: suggest killing gconfd; removing .gnome[2] (did not help); unmerging openldap (did not help - earlier I had it not installed, now dev-libs/openssl , sys-apps/tcp-wrappers , sys-libs/ncurses depend on (?) openldap as revealed by dependencies.sh (https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=8453)).
In 12874 this thread is mentioned https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=6139
A search in Google didn't help neither.
Last edited by ct on Wed Sep 18, 2002 4:18 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
damodred n00b
Joined: 24 Jul 2002 Posts: 26 Location: Moenchengladbach / Germany
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2002 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I have exactly the same problem you have mentioned, all the other threads related to similar problems didn't help me to solve the problem!
A few weeks ago I installed my system totally new, before this I had a similar configuration and I had not this problem with nautilus, now with the reinstalled system and really similar configuration (enlightenment and nautilus as directory manager, without whole gnome emerged) I get this annoying error sometimes I start nautilus (other gnome tools produce the same error but only AFTER I got the error starting nautilus)! So I think it has something to do with Nautilus and the gconf system.
Hope anyone can help with this problem!
damodred |
|
Back to top |
|
|
charlieg Advocate
Joined: 30 Jul 2002 Posts: 2149 Location: Manchester UK
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2002 2:23 pm Post subject: Potential fix? |
|
|
I had this problem too, but I just went through an "emerge -u world" and it has... gone away?
Also I might suggest "emerge gnome-terminal multi-gnome-terminal" as they are not automatically done with an emerge gnome. _________________ Want Free games?
Free Gamer - open source games list & commentary
Open source web-enabled rich UI platform: Vexi |
|
Back to top |
|
|
damodred n00b
Joined: 24 Jul 2002 Posts: 26 Location: Moenchengladbach / Germany
|
Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay my problem with nautilus is solved!
I used evolution as mail client, after several reboots I could reproduce the error:
- start of enlightenment
- start of my I-net connection
- evolution
- nautilus
this gave me constant the errors mentioned above
But not starting evolution was the solution! I can start any application in any order, nautilus will never fail! Only when I start Nautilus after evolution I get these silly errors...
emerge gconf or emerge -C evolution + emerge evolution didn't help to solve this, so I emerged sylpheed-claw as e-mail client!
And after a few days I can say that I never got the above mentioned errors again...
It would be interesting what is going wrong with evolution, before my reinstall of the system I didn't get these strange errors with evolution...
bye,
damodred |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ct n00b
Joined: 22 Jul 2002 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2002 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gone. The error does not show anymore.
I cannot for sure tell what solved the problem, my best guess is that
Code: | emerge control-center | now in version 2.0.1.1 solved the problem.
Anyhow - what I have also emerged recently (might had their influence on the problem?):
nautilus (2.0.7) and many dependecies that came with it
baselayout (1.8.3)
scrollkeeper (0.3.11-r1)
gnome-terminal and multi-gnome-terminal
portage (2.0.37)
The suggestion emerge -u world finally lead to me to this solution. It did not show any useful information though with my previously installed portage. Only after I have upgraded from portage 2.0.13 to portage 2.0.37 an "emerge -p world | grep U" did show me packages that could be updated.
Thank you for your answers. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paul138 Guru
Joined: 09 Aug 2002 Posts: 370 Location: Ottawa, ON
|
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2002 3:28 pm Post subject: Simple |
|
|
For me the solution was much more simple than rebuilding. Create a link from /usr/libexec/gconfd-2 in /usr/bin
Fixed. _________________ Talk is cheap because supply always exceeds demand. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kappax Apprentice
Joined: 30 Aug 2002 Posts: 273 Location: The Moon
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2002 10:00 pm Post subject: Re: Simple |
|
|
paul138 wrote: | For me the solution was much more simple than rebuilding. Create a link from /usr/libexec/gconfd-2 in /usr/bin
Fixed. |
wow that worked and was ez!!!
THANKS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paul138 Guru
Joined: 09 Aug 2002 Posts: 370 Location: Ottawa, ON
|
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2002 1:34 pm Post subject: Re: Simple |
|
|
kappax wrote: |
wow that worked and was ez!!!
THANKS |
NP. It's very interesting though, if you make a new user and use gnome as thier wm you can run gnome without this link.
I think this one is bugzilla-bound.
Off to the bug base... _________________ Talk is cheap because supply always exceeds demand. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pilla Bodhisattva
Joined: 07 Aug 2002 Posts: 7729 Location: Underworld
|
Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2002 1:21 am Post subject: Re: Simple++ |
|
|
Didn' t work for me, but this works
Code: |
/usr/bin/gconfigtool-2 --spawn
|
it creates an instance of the gconfd-2. If you run it twice, it won' t create one more daemon.
paul138 wrote: | kappax wrote: |
wow that worked and was ez!!!
THANKS |
NP. It's very interesting though, if you make a new user and use gnome as thier wm you can run gnome without this link.
I think this one is bugzilla-bound.
Off to the bug base... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
paul138 Guru
Joined: 09 Aug 2002 Posts: 370 Location: Ottawa, ON
|
Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2002 1:43 pm Post subject: Filed |
|
|
The resolution via the bug report I filed was to exit X all together and run oaf-slay, edit the .xinitrc and change window managers.
I was because (in my case) I was running fluxbox and using Galeon (Gnome 1.x) which started gconfd-1. Then Gnome 2x apps would crash because they were using gconfd-1 instead of gconfd2. _________________ Talk is cheap because supply always exceeds demand. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
joycea Apprentice
Joined: 23 Jul 2002 Posts: 191 Location: Kingston, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can continue using fluxbox, just start the gconfd-2 daemon before doing anything else (ie. in your xinitrc) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paul138 Guru
Joined: 09 Aug 2002 Posts: 370 Location: Ottawa, ON
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 4:03 pm Post subject: Hmm |
|
|
Which would be fine except that gconfd will die if not used for a period of time. _________________ Talk is cheap because supply always exceeds demand. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
joycea Apprentice
Joined: 23 Jul 2002 Posts: 191 Location: Kingston, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting... after starting gconfd-2 before evolution my comp has run fine all day with no error boxes. Before that I would get an error whenever I started evolution. After investigating though ps lists the gconf I started awhile ago as a zombie process. I don't know what's happened, maybe it's just my lucky day so far.
Do you think running gconfd-2 just before I run nautilus each time might be a more permanent solution? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
crimson Guru
Joined: 27 Apr 2002 Posts: 430 Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2003 4:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
My problem is very similar, if I run gnome-terminal before I run galeon, I'm ok. But if I run galeon before running gnome-terminal "CORBA ERROR, 1.0 blabla".
So what is a good fix for this? I don't want to have to kill gconfd-1 everytime I want to run a terminal, or I don't want to have to make sure I run terminal first everytime I want to use Galeon. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|