View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bin-doph Guru
Joined: 23 May 2003 Posts: 302
|
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2004 8:19 am Post subject: SA-Exim |
|
|
Hi,
is there a way to have a "portaged" patched exim (there's a use-flag for exiscan, but I haven't found anything about sa-exim
http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html) without creating my own ebuild. There aren't any bugreports or forum-entries here, so I guess I'm the first person "requesting" such a patch/add-on.
Am I right there?
thx,
-fe _________________ perl -e '$_=q;4a75737420616e6f74686572205065726c204861636b65720as;;for(s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s){s;(..)s?;qq qprint chr 0x$1 and \161 ssq;excess;}' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NightSpirit n00b
Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 71 Location: North London, UK
|
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2004 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Isn't this just what you would get from following the instructions listed in https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=83500?
I followed that excellent guide and have an exim mail server running all mail through spamassassin and clamav before routing it internally. _________________ Currently playing with Applescript ... hmmm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bin-doph Guru
Joined: 23 May 2003 Posts: 302
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2004 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
nope. the differnce between sa-exim and "usual" spamassassin is that with sa-exim you can reject emails at SMTP-time, when your server really reads the email. The advantage is, that you will never see emails with for example .pif attachments or with a score greater $what_your_think_is_too_high
for more infos have a look at
http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html
cheers
-fe _________________ perl -e '$_=q;4a75737420616e6f74686572205065726c204861636b65720as;;for(s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s){s;(..)s?;qq qprint chr 0x$1 and \161 ssq;excess;}' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NightSpirit n00b
Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 71 Location: North London, UK
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2004 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ahh, well ok. I thought that was what the exiscan allowed you to do with regular spamassassin. I don't actually allow direct external SMTP access to exim anyways since I have no need to do that. All mail is grabbed using fetchmail and scanned at the time and rejected if it can be determined as spam or virus. Not sure what fetchmail does about that, maybe it bounces it, maybe it just deletes it. _________________ Currently playing with Applescript ... hmmm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kellyk n00b
Joined: 30 Mar 2004 Posts: 4 Location: Canada
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
bin-doph Guru
Joined: 23 May 2003 Posts: 302
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know exiscan-acl's very well and maybe you should have a look here
http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html
I also altered an ebuild for exim 4.21, which optinally installs sa-exim
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47106
-fe _________________ perl -e '$_=q;4a75737420616e6f74686572205065726c204861636b65720as;;for(s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s){s;(..)s?;qq qprint chr 0x$1 and \161 ssq;excess;}' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bin-doph Guru
Joined: 23 May 2003 Posts: 302
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bin-doph wrote: | nope. the differnce between sa-exim and "usual" spamassassin is that with sa-exim you can reject emails at SMTP-time, when your server really reads the email. The advantage is, that you will never see emails with for example .pif attachments or with a score greater $what_your_think_is_too_high
|
this is of course bullshit, have a look at bugreport 47106 _________________ perl -e '$_=q;4a75737420616e6f74686572205065726c204861636b65720as;;for(s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s;s){s;(..)s?;qq qprint chr 0x$1 and \161 ssq;excess;}' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|