View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
carbon Guru
Joined: 27 Jun 2003 Posts: 455 Location: New York
|
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2004 11:20 pm Post subject: speedstep vs throttling, what's the difference? |
|
|
AFAIK, my pentium m 1.3 ghz can only scale down to a minimum speed of 600mhz. But the throttling under /proc/acpi/processer/CPU/ i can cat 7 to it to have it run at appoximately 101mhz.
So how does throttling related to the speed step that pentium m has? _________________ I do what I want, and that's what I do.
GNU World Domination
Carbon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Earthwings Bodhisattva
Joined: 14 Apr 2003 Posts: 7753 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2004 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Throttling works by periodically enforcing the CPU to sleep for a short amount of time. It doesn't save much energy, but reduces the temperature.
CPU frequency scaling *really* scales the CPU frequency down to something lower and saves energy and reduces the temperature. _________________ KDE |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carbon Guru
Joined: 27 Jun 2003 Posts: 455 Location: New York
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 1:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
so if i wanna scale down the freq of the cpu, what to do? _________________ I do what I want, and that's what I do.
GNU World Domination
Carbon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dtor Guru
Joined: 19 Jan 2004 Posts: 461 Location: Indiana, USA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 4:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Earthwings wrote: | Throttling works by periodically enforcing the CPU to sleep for a short amount of time. It doesn't save much energy, but reduces the temperature.
CPU frequency scaling *really* scales the CPU frequency down to something lower and saves energy and reduces the temperature. |
Throttling does lower the frequency, but energy savings is linear.
Speedstep lowers frequency and voltage thus potentially allowing much higher (power 2) evergy savings. _________________ Dmitry |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carbon Guru
Joined: 27 Jun 2003 Posts: 455 Location: New York
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yeah, thanks for the info, but back to my question. how do i scale down frequency and voltage, instead of just messing around with the throttling. _________________ I do what I want, and that's what I do.
GNU World Domination
Carbon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Earthwings Bodhisattva
Joined: 14 Apr 2003 Posts: 7753 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have you tried the howto linked in my signature? _________________ KDE |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carbon Guru
Joined: 27 Jun 2003 Posts: 455 Location: New York
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yeah, i will try that. _________________ I do what I want, and that's what I do.
GNU World Domination
Carbon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brodo Guru
Joined: 15 Apr 2003 Posts: 319
|
Posted: Sat May 15, 2004 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dtor wrote: | Throttling does lower the frequency, but energy savings is linear.
Speedstep lowers frequency and voltage thus potentially allowing much higher (power 2) evergy savings. |
actually, it's up to third power savings by frequency and voltage scaling; so two powers better than throttling... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|