| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
steel300
Veteran
Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 11:47 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Master_Of_Disaster wrote: | | done |
Got it, thanks.
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Superman53142
n00b
Joined: 24 Mar 2003
Posts: 54
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | CC drivers/net/8139too.o
drivers/net/8139too.c:823:91: warning: null character(s) ignored
drivers/net/8139too.c: In function `rtl8139_init_board':
drivers/net/8139too.c:812: error: syntax error at end of input
drivers/net/8139too.c:776: warning: unused variable `version'
drivers/net/8139too.c:773: warning: unused variable `i'
drivers/net/8139too.c:771: warning: unused variable `tmp8'
drivers/net/8139too.c:768: warning: unused variable `ioaddr'
drivers/net/8139too.c:160: warning: `media' defined but not used
drivers/net/8139too.c:161: warning: `full_duplex' defined but not used
drivers/net/8139too.c:165: warning: `multicast_filter_limit' defined but not
d
drivers/net/8139too.c:168: warning: `debug' defined but not used
drivers/net/8139too.c:230: warning: `board_info' defined but not used
drivers/net/8139too.c:236: warning: `rtl8139_pci_tbl' defined but not used
drivers/net/8139too.c:279: warning: `ethtool_stats_keys' defined but not used
drivers/net/8139too.c:605: warning: `read_eeprom' declared `static' but never
fined
drivers/net/8139too.c:606: warning: `rtl8139_open' declared `static' but neve
efined
drivers/net/8139too.c:607: warning: `mdio_read' declared `static' but never d
ned
drivers/net/8139too.c:609: warning: `mdio_write' declared `static' but never
ined
drivers/net/8139too.c:610: warning: `rtl8139_start_thread' declared `static'
never defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:611: warning: `rtl8139_tx_timeout' declared `static' bu
ever defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:612: warning: `rtl8139_init_ring' declared `static' but
ver defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:614: warning: `rtl8139_start_xmit' declared `static' bu
ever defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:615: warning: `rtl8139_poll' declared `static' but neve
efined
drivers/net/8139too.c:620: warning: `rtl8139_interrupt' declared `static' but
ver defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:621: warning: `rtl8139_close' declared `static' but nev
defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:622: warning: `netdev_ioctl' declared `static' but neve
efined
drivers/net/8139too.c:623: warning: `rtl8139_get_stats' declared `static' but
ver defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:624: warning: `rtl8139_set_rx_mode' declared `static' b
never defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:625: warning: `__set_rx_mode' declared `static' but nev
defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:626: warning: `rtl8139_hw_start' declared `static' but
er defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:627: warning: `rtl8139_ethtool_ops' defined but not use
drivers/net/8139too.c:723: warning: `__rtl8139_cleanup_dev' defined but not u
drivers/net/8139too.c:749: warning: `rtl8139_chip_reset' defined but not used
drivers/net/8139too.c:767: warning: `rtl8139_init_board' defined but not used
drivers/net/8139too.c:814:1: unterminated #ifdef
make[2]: *** [drivers/net/8139too.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2 |
My NIC is broken 
_________________
'I belong to the "Great-God Party", and will have nothing to do with the "Little-God Party." Christ does not want nibblers of the possible, but grabbers of the impossible.'
~C. T. Studd |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
steel300
Veteran
Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
@superman
Good god, what did you do? That looks like a bad driver in mm. I know I didn't touch that one. Could you try using the latest mm and see if the problem still occurs?
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sdaffis
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 16 Nov 2003
Posts: 100
Location: Umeå, Sweden
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | They aren't included anymore. I was under the impression that they weren't needed anymore. If you still have problems, try and upgrade your BIOS, taht should take care of everything. |
I'm not really a friend of bios updates... Could you post a link to the patches so I can apply them automatically in the future?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Martigen
n00b
Joined: 04 Mar 2003
Posts: 59
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| steel300 wrote: | | hinken wrote: | just wondering, is the nforce-apic-patches included in this kernel?
Good job Steel, love your style! |
They aren't included anymore. I was under the impression that they weren't needed anymore. If you still have problems, try and upgrade your BIOS, taht should take care of everything. |
They are still needed, even with latest BIOSes, as my machine can attest. They're very handy patches to have -- if you can run your machine 10 degrees cooler, why wouldn't you?
I'm a revent love-convert and have had to manually patch all previous kernels. Would be great if love included them by default!
Keep up the good work.
Mart |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stahlsau
Guru
Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 584
Location: WildWestwoods
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 6:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | They aren't included anymore. I was under the impression that they weren't needed anymore. If you still have problems, try and upgrade your BIOS, taht should take care of everything. |
sry, but the bios-update doesn't take care of this issue, at least not on my box. I can tell you by the hardlocks when you took out the patches 
ATM, i'm running a patched dev-kernel with nvidia-apic and reiser4, and 'cause i changed my drives to reiser4, i'm not able to run love-sources
But later, when you include reiser4, i'd LOVE to see those nvidia-patches included |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PrakashP
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 1249
Location: C.C.A.A., Germania
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I already said it a few time and I say it again: Those patches are not the right ones. Take a llok into the german forum under the topic "kernel ohne apic". There I posted some more intelligent patches. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Regor
Guru
Joined: 06 Aug 2002
Posts: 545
Location: 39° 2' 48" N, 120° 59' 2" W
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| steel300 wrote: | | nepenthe wrote: | I'm getting this error now...
| Code: | #
SPLIT include/linux/autoconf.h -> include/config/*
make[1]: `arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CC arch/i386/mm/init.o
CC arch/i386/mm/pgtable.o
arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c: In function `show_mem':
arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c:27: warning: unused variable `badram'
LD arch/i386/mm/built-in.o
CC kernel/kmod.o
kernel/kmod.c: In function `call_usermodehelper':
kernel/kmod.c:253: error: `khelper_wq' undeclared (first use in this function)
kernel/kmod.c:253: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
kernel/kmod.c:253: error: for each function it appears in.)
kernel/kmod.c: In function `usermodehelper_init':
kernel/kmod.c:267: error: `khelper_wq' undeclared (first use in this function)
make[1]: *** [kernel/kmod.o] Error 1
make: *** [kernel] Error 2
|
hmm... =) |
Try this patch: http://lkml.org/lkml/diff/2004/4/19/41/1 |
I had the same error as nepenthe. That patch did the trick. Thanks!
_________________
Sometimes the appropriate response to reality is to go insane.
-Philip K. Dick, Valis |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sawanv
Apprentice
Joined: 05 Dec 2002
Posts: 238
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Any chance of getting this in love sources:
http://shfs.sourceforge.net/index.html
Looks really useful.....
Keep up the good work steel300.
_________________
Eir kahen "chalo ghar jayen",
Bir kahen "chalo ghar jayen",
Phatte kahen "chalo ghar jayen",
Cartman kahen....."Screw you guys, I am going home !!! " |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
justin sane
n00b
Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 31
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sawanv wrote: | | http://shfs.sourceforge.net/index.html |
Is there any good reason why you wouldn't use LUFS for that? Maybe it's a little faster, but for a network connected filesystem (especially over the internet.. even with broadband) I don't see the advantage over a LUFS solution. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jimbojetset
n00b
Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 67
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
All working nicely here - ati binary drivers compiled and working well although error filling dmesg:
| Code: |
led
[fglrx:firegl_agp_lock_pages] *ERROR* agp_allocate_memory_phys_list failed
[fglrx:firegl_agp_lock_pages] *ERROR* agp_allocate_memory_phys_list failed
[fglrx:firegl_agp_lock_pages] *ERROR* agp_allocate_memory_phys_list failed
[fglrx:firegl_agp_lock_pages] *ERROR* agp_allocate_memory_phys_list failed
etc....
|
Everything seems to be working properly so obviously nothing critical
James |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fallow
Bodhisattva
Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2208
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bootsplash doesn`t work also .
i can`t live without bootsplash
greetzz
_________________
"Time is a companion that goes with us on a journey. It reminds us to cherish each moment, because it will never come again. What we leave behind is not as important as how we have lived" J-L. Picard |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
steel300
Veteran
Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| justin sane wrote: | | sawanv wrote: | | http://shfs.sourceforge.net/index.html |
Is there any good reason why you wouldn't use LUFS for that? Maybe it's a little faster, but for a network connected filesystem (especially over the internet.. even with broadband) I don't see the advantage over a LUFS solution. |
Lufs supports lots of different protocols instead of just ssh. I'd prefer lufs over this solution, since it's more of an "all in one" type dealie. Not a bad idea though.
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sdaffis
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 16 Nov 2003
Posts: 100
Location: Umeå, Sweden
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I already said it a few time and I say it again: Those patches are not the right ones. Take a llok into the german forum under the topic "kernel ohne apic". There I posted some more intelligent patches. |
When I try to apply your patches I simply get this:
| Code: | linux-2.6.6-rc1-love1 # patch -p1 < /home/jonas/nforce2-apic.patch2 patching file arch/i386/kernel/apic.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1065 with fuzz 2 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1090.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1203 with fuzz 2 (offset -5 lines).
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/i386/kernel/apic.c.rej |
and this:
| Code: | linux-2.6.6-rc1-love1 # patch -p1 < /home/jonas/nforce2-acpi.patch2 patching file Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
Hunk #1 FAILED at 122.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt.rej
patching file arch/i386/kernel/setup.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 636 with fuzz 2 (offset 22 lines).
patching file arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] y
Hunk #2 FAILED at 327.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c.rej
patching file Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
Hunk #1 FAILED at 122.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt.rej
patching file arch/i386/kernel/setup.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 642 with fuzz 2 (offset 28 lines).
patching file arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c
Hunk #2 FAILED at 328.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c.rej
|
Please note that it didn't make any difference in answering yes or no to "Assume -R?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
snekiepete
Guru
Joined: 07 May 2003
Posts: 306
Location: WISCONSIN
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SMP has been broken since 2.6.5-love5
Any reason why this may possibly be? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
steel300
Veteran
Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| snekiepete wrote: | SMP has been broken since 2.6.5-love5
Any reason why this may possibly be? |
What? I'm using SMP right now. What leads you to believe that SMP is broken?
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
polle
Veteran
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 1498
Location: Belgium
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| works fine , except for bootsplash like mentioned before |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
snekiepete
Guru
Joined: 07 May 2003
Posts: 306
Location: WISCONSIN
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have not been able to get either kernels to boot with SMP support enabled. I am trying the mm-sources to see if I get the same result. The bootup just spits out some jibberish and freezes requiring a hard reboot.......
They do boot with SMP unselected, and I am running an HT processor, not an actual 2 cpu system, so i did try to also have SMT support enabled and disabled, neither made any difference |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
steel300
Veteran
Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| snekiepete wrote: | I have not been able to get either kernels to boot with SMP support enabled. I am trying the mm-sources to see if I get the same result. The bootup just spits out some jibberish and freezes requiring a hard reboot.......
They do boot with SMP unselected, and I am running an HT processor, not an actual 2 cpu system, so i did try to also have SMT support enabled and disabled, neither made any difference |
Hmm, odd, it shouldn't do that. I'm guseeing it ahs something to do with apic or acpi. Did you enable acpi? Could you pass pci=coacpi on the kernel line and see if it boots then?
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
snekiepete
Guru
Joined: 07 May 2003
Posts: 306
Location: WISCONSIN
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'll give that a shot, I have the same problem with 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
snekiepete
Guru
Joined: 07 May 2003
Posts: 306
Location: WISCONSIN
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I got a little further with pci=noacpi, here is the error message
Kernel panic: Fatal exception in interrupt
then it lists some cpu registers, ie ebx, ecx, edx, ds and so on. But is frozen to the world...... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
steel300
Veteran
Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| snekiepete wrote: | Well, I got a little further with pci=noacpi, here is the error message
Kernel panic: Fatal exception in interrupt
then it lists some cpu registers, ie ebx, ecx, edx, ds and so on. But is frozen to the world...... |
Was this on mm or love or both? What are your system specs?
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
snekiepete
Guru
Joined: 07 May 2003
Posts: 306
Location: WISCONSIN
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| exactly the same on both, I am running a 2.8 p4, on an intel d865perl mobo at 800mhz. Both kernels will start with SMP disabled, and this started with 2.6.5-love5 ( I did not try the mm-sources with that kernel, but I suppose the outcome to be similiar). I am not sure what other specs would be handy, let me know.... Thanks Steel |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
steel300
Veteran
Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| snekiepete wrote: | | exactly the same on both, I am running a 2.8 p4, on an intel d865perl mobo at 800mhz. Both kernels will start with SMP disabled, and this started with 2.6.5-love5 ( I did not try the mm-sources with that kernel, but I suppose the outcome to be similiar). I am not sure what other specs would be handy, let me know.... Thanks Steel |
hmm, could you try backing out this patch and tell me how it goes:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.5/2.6.5-mm6/broken-out/sched-wake_up-speedup.patch
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
joki
n00b
Joined: 30 Sep 2003
Posts: 53
Location: germany
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Linux jokiGentoo 2.6.6-rc1-love1 #2 Tue Apr 20 13:47:44 GMT 2004 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
|
it runs like a charm!!
this time without preemption, and it feels better like any kernel before!
_________________
emerge dev-pocket/money |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
