| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Raku
Bodhisattva
Joined: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 2374
Location: Poland
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:07 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| sebad wrote: | | Cos w tym jest raku. Tez mam stery 8.20.8 ,a na starych mialem cos ok 500fps mniej. |
teraz niech jeszcze dodadzą obsługę composite, akcelerację na więcej niż jednej sesji X jednocześnie i będę miał wszystko czego mi trzeba od karty graficznej 
_________________
raku
Powered by Archlinux  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cichy
Apprentice
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 217
Location: Jasionówka/podlaskie/Poland
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AthlonXP@1836, 768MB@333, KT400
Radeon 9600"pro" (400/400):
| Code: |
13322 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2664.400 FPS
14169 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2833.800 FPS
14215 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2843.000 FPS
14416 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2883.200 FPS
14413 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2882.600 FPS
14416 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2883.200 FPS
|
Radeon 9600 @ 450/500:
| Code: |
17554 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3510.800 FPS
17783 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3556.600 FPS
17777 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3555.400 FPS
17786 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3557.200 FPS
17779 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3555.800 FPS
|
Pozdrawiam
_________________
::Gentoo::Linux::(athlon-xp // amd64 // pentium-m // nocona)::ID:387704:: |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kurt Steiner
Bodhisattva
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 1050
Location: Ostroleka, Polska
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Odświeżę trochę wątek.
Mój sprzęt: zintegrowany Intel 82845, Celeron 2,2 GHz, 1 GB RAMu.
Z normalnej wielkości oknem:
| Code: | 2684 frames in 5.0 seconds = 536.800 FPS
2800 frames in 5.0 seconds = 560.000 FPS
2799 frames in 5.0 seconds = 559.800 FPS
2797 frames in 5.0 seconds = 559.400 FPS
2798 frames in 5.0 seconds = 559.600 FPS
2798 frames in 5.0 seconds = 559.600 FPS
2797 frames in 5.0 seconds = 559.400 FPS
2797 frames in 5.0 seconds = 559.400 FPS
2799 frames in 5.0 seconds = 559.800 FPS
2799 frames in 5.0 seconds = 559.800 FPS |
Z oknem zmaksymalizowanym:
| Code: | 381 frames in 5.0 seconds = 76.200 FPS
380 frames in 5.0 seconds = 76.000 FPS
379 frames in 5.0 seconds = 75.800 FPS
381 frames in 5.0 seconds = 76.200 FPS
380 frames in 5.0 seconds = 76.000 FPS
381 frames in 5.0 seconds = 76.200 FPS
380 frames in 5.0 seconds = 76.000 FPS
380 frames in 5.0 seconds = 76.000 FPS
380 frames in 5.0 seconds = 76.000 FPS
381 frames in 5.0 seconds = 76.200 FPS
|
Z oknem zminimalizowanym:
| Code: | 11710 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2342.000 FPS
11708 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2341.600 FPS
11707 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2341.400 FPS
11704 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2340.800 FPS
11710 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2342.000 FPS
11715 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2343.000 FPS
11713 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2342.600 FPS
11707 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2341.400 FPS
11704 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2340.800 FPS
11708 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2341.600 FPS
|
Nie zauważyłem znaczącej poprawy po włączeniu direct renderingu. Czy to oznacza, że istnieje możliwość osiągnięcia lepszych wyników?
_________________
Proszę, pamiętaj o regulaminie, a jeśli zauważysz, że został on złamany, zgłoś to.
LRU:431698 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
doman
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Posts: 84
Location: Poland, Wrocław/Wałbrzych
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
to i ja się wpiszę
Athlon-xp 2600+, Radeon 9600Pro:
| Code: | doman@Gentoo ~ $ glxgears
12933 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2586.600 FPS
15697 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3139.400 FPS
15708 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3141.600 FPS
15698 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3139.600 FPS
15700 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3140.000 FPS |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gabrys
Veteran
Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 1096
Location: Toruń [PL]
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ja ostatnio testowałem komputer w pracy. Normalne okienko, sterowniki savage, komp nawet niezły (Celeron (P4) ~1GHz). Wyniki niestety niezbyt szałowe: ~70 fps. Są jakieś lepsze sterowniki do: | Code: | | VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. VT8375 [ProSavage8 KM266/KL266] |
?
_________________
Sabayon Professional 1.1 (czyli zdradziłem oryginalne Gentoo)
@ Dell Inspiron 8600 (nVidia, Realtek, Pentium M) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pawels
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 17 Feb 2006
Posts: 124
Location: Polska Kościerzyna
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Moje wyniki na:
Athlon-XP 2200XP+ (~1.8Ghz), Saphire Radeon 9100 128M, 512 RAM, Gigabyte GA-7VA
| Code: | 9708 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1941.600 FPS
10223 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2044.600 FPS
10171 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2034.200 FPS
10192 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2038.400 FPS
10223 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2044.600 FPS
10224 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2044.800 FPS
10223 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2044.600 FPS
10222 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2044.400 FPS
10203 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2040.600 FPS
10222 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2044.400 FPS
10200 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2040.000 FPS
|
 Czy winiki w są adekwatne do posiadanego sprzetu? nie wiem, jesli ma ktos podobną konfiguracje proszę o komentarz |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gabrys
Veteran
Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 1096
Location: Toruń [PL]
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
są
_________________
Sabayon Professional 1.1 (czyli zdradziłem oryginalne Gentoo)
@ Dell Inspiron 8600 (nVidia, Realtek, Pentium M) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Belliash
Advocate
Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Posts: 2503
Location: Wroclaw, Poland
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| muchar wrote: | | zytek wrote: | | wooow.. chyba wyrzucę mojego FXa ;] a cóż to za "zmiany" ? |
Wykorzystałem konfig ze starej nVidii - zamieniłem jedynie linijkę z "nvidia" na "fglrx". Oprócz tego odhaszowałem to, co związane z DRI.
Nie wiem czemu, ale fglrxconfig znacznie gorzej to konfiguruje. |
A co konkretnie zmieniles??
=============
23877 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4775.317 FPS
20592 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4118.314 FPS
35025 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7004.880 FPS
38990 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7797.119 FPS
23123 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4624.445 FPS
21063 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4212.569 FPS
33397 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6679.291 FPS
20591 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4118.140 FPS
31597 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6319.368 FPS
39281 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7856.197 FPS
39314 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7862.630 FPS
38943 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7788.465 FPS
39270 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7853.996 FPS
39191 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7838.087 FPS
38712 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7742.292 FPS
39458 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7891.534 FPS
Athlon64 3000+ Venice @ 2500MHz: FSB podniesione na 280MHz
1GB RAMu DDR400 zanizony do DDR375 z powodu OC CPU.
Geeforce 6600 128MB pamieci na pokladzie PCI-E 16x
Wlaczone Composite.
Jestem ciekaw jakby bylo z DRI 
===========
3986 frames in 5.0 seconds = 789.842 FPS
15131 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3026.163 FPS
39099 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7819.617 FPS
39270 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7852.027 FPS
114 frames in 5.1 seconds = 22.309 FPS
247 frames in 5.3 seconds = 46.737 FPS
5041 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1008.181 FPS
36173 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7231.433 FPS
38528 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7705.454 FPS
17085 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3416.949 FPS
3948 frames in 5.2 seconds = 761.110 FPS
4576 frames in 5.1 seconds = 904.084 FPS
3723 frames in 6.4 seconds = 577.316 FPS
1395 frames in 5.0 seconds = 278.063 FPS
9466 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1893.120 FPS
20186 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4037.017 FPS
7700 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1539.968 FPS
2451 frames in 5.1 seconds = 482.447 FPS
W tle kompilacja
Probujac cheatow:
38379 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7675.699 FPS
39553 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7910.509 FPS
39515 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7902.821 FPS
39552 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7910.350 FPS
39463 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7892.562 FPS
39330 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7865.976 FPS
39473 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7894.587 FPS
39484 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7896.660 FPS
39518 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7903.538 FPS
39499 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7899.658 FPS
39077 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7815.275 FPS
38803 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7760.437 FPS
38976 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7795.115 FPS
39110 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7821.981 FPS
38806 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7761.178 FPS
38960 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7791.988 FPS
38774 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7754.688 FPS
Wiec wcale nie lepiej niz bez nich
od raku: nie dyskutuj sam ze sobą. Chcesz coś dopisać, użyj opcji EDYCJA !!
Połączono dwa posty
_________________
Asio Software Technologies
Belliash IT Weblog |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dylon
Guru
Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 331
Location: Gliwice
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Duron 700 + 512MB ram + ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R200 QL [Radeon 8500 LE]: + ecs k7s5al
| Code: |
dylon@baal ~ $ glxgears
4959 frames in 5.0 seconds = 991.800 FPS
7544 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1508.800 FPS
7608 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1521.600 FPS
7778 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1555.600 FPS
7605 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1521.000 FPS
7803 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1560.600 FPS
7585 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1517.000 FPS
7676 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1535.200 FPS
|
_________________
Maciej Dylski |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
danrok^
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 11 Sep 2004
Posts: 117
Location: Poland, Zabrze
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Coś mało macie na tych radeonach, mój 9700pro wyciąga tyle:
| Code: | 23857 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4771.400 FPS
23859 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4771.800 FPS
23862 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4772.400 FPS
23873 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4774.600 FPS
23877 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4775.400 FPS
23875 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4775.000 FPS
23876 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4775.200 FPS
23884 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4776.800 FPS
23886 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4777.200 FPS
23667 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4733.400 FPS
|
reszta systemu to: athlon64 2800+, 512 ddr, X, Gnome +pare programów odpalonych. System jednak mam na ~x86.
Pozdro. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kfiaciarka
Veteran
Joined: 20 May 2005
Posts: 1498
Location: Dobre Miasto, Poland
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Na GF 6600 GT:) Bez oszukiwania:
| Code: | 30425 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6084.833 FPS
34021 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6804.177 FPS
34032 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6806.385 FPS
33793 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6758.423 FPS
33942 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6788.243 FPS
33812 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6762.366 FPS
34036 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6807.153 FPS
33824 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6764.625 FPS
33881 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6776.155 FPS |
A na ati 9550 xt : (8.23.7)
| Code: |
glxgears
17113 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3422.600 FPS
19343 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3868.600 FPS
19334 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3866.800 FPS
19346 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3869.200 FPS
19346 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3869.200 FPS
19337 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3867.400 FPS
19347 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3869.400 FPS
|
Na gf pod xgl'em
| Code: |
glxgears
41820 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8360.441 FPS
42010 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8395.643 FPS
42011 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8387.005 FPS
42114 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8401.675 FPS
41896 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8368.979 FPS
X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown). |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kurt Steiner
Bodhisattva
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 1050
Location: Ostroleka, Polska
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Czy zauważyliście spadek wyników po instalacji modularnego Xorga? Ja właśnie przywrócilem dri po instalacji Xorg 7 i zauważyłem spory spadek.  W przypadku normalnego okna z trybikami jest to zmiana o około 15%, zaś w przypadku okna zminimalizowanego o ponad 60%!  Z 2300 klatek na ok 950! 
U Was też tak jest, czy tylko ja coś spindoliłem? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gentooxic
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 108
Location: N 50°48' E 19°07'
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cichy wrote: | AthlonXP@1836, 768MB@333, KT400
Radeon 9600"pro" (400/400):
| Code: |
13322 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2664.400 FPS
14169 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2833.800 FPS
14215 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2843.000 FPS
14416 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2883.200 FPS
14413 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2882.600 FPS
14416 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2883.200 FPS
|
Radeon 9600 @ 450/500:
| Code: |
17554 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3510.800 FPS
17783 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3556.600 FPS
17777 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3555.400 FPS
17786 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3557.200 FPS
17779 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3555.800 FPS
|
Pozdrawiam |
Jak podkrecic grafe ATI na Gentoo?, wogole Linuksie? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mirekm
Apprentice
Joined: 12 Feb 2004
Posts: 210
Location: Gliwice
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
To ja się też dopiszę
AMD 64 X2 4200+, Nvidia 7800GLX PCI-E
| Code: |
66255 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13250.920 FPS
67178 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13435.546 FPS
67548 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13509.412 FPS
67471 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13494.011 FPS
67155 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13430.821 FPS
67669 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13533.711 FPS
67768 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13553.543 FPS
67771 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13554.138 FPS
67631 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13526.024 FPS
67623 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13524.422 FPS
67695 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13538.824 FPS
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cichy
Apprentice
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 217
Location: Jasionówka/podlaskie/Poland
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| gentooxic wrote: |
Jak podkrecic grafe ATI na Gentoo?, wogole Linuksie? |
Mozna to zrobic za pomoca rovclock. Od niedawna jest w portage...
Venice 3000+@2615MHz, 1GB DDR@398MHz, nForce4SLI, Gigabyte GV-NX66T128D-SP GF6600GT
@ 500/1000MHz:
| Code: |
user@Antek64 ~ $ glxgears
31913 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6382.600 FPS
38328 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7665.600 FPS
38328 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7665.600 FPS
38331 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7666.200 FPS
38329 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7665.800 FPS
38319 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7663.800 FPS
|
@ 500/1200MHz:
| Code: |
user@Antek64 ~ $ glxgears
41903 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8380.600 FPS
43988 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8797.600 FPS
43960 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8792.000 FPS
43969 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8793.800 FPS
43988 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8797.600 FPS
43978 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8795.600 FPS
|
Pozdrawiam
_________________
::Gentoo::Linux::(athlon-xp // amd64 // pentium-m // nocona)::ID:387704:: |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ShadowWizzard
n00b
Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 70
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ASUS V9999 - GeForce 6800 :
| Code: | Card: nVidia Geforce 6800GT
Architecture: NV40 A1
PCI id: 0x45
GPU clock: 351.000 MHz
Bustype: AGP
GeForce 6800 + Athlon 2800 @ 2255 Mhz + 1GB RAM
|
65329 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13065.785 FPS
64893 frames in 5.0 seconds = 12978.550 FPS
65413 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13082.448 FPS
65242 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13048.212 FPS
64947 frames in 5.0 seconds = 12989.350 FPS
65258 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13051.558 FPS
64513 frames in 5.0 seconds = 12902.548 FPS
65266 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13053.021 FPS
ASUS V9999 - GeForce 6800 :
| Code: | Card: nVidia Geforce 6800GT
Architecture: NV40 A1
PCI id: 0x45
GPU clock: 431.000 MHz
Bustype: AGP
GeForce 6800 + Athlon 2800 @ 2255 Mhz + 1GB RAM
|
71411 frames in 5.0 seconds = 14282.135 FPS
71003 frames in 5.0 seconds = 14200.592 FPS
71517 frames in 5.0 seconds = 14303.223 FPS
70975 frames in 5.0 seconds = 14194.949 FPS
71577 frames in 5.0 seconds = 14315.345 FPS
70961 frames in 5.0 seconds = 14192.075 FPS
71563 frames in 5.0 seconds = 14312.459 FPS
70374 frames in 5.0 seconds = 14074.695 FPS
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mazdac
n00b
Joined: 11 Mar 2006
Posts: 22
|
| Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ATI ALL-IN-WONDER 9600 XT (8.23.7), Pentium 4 Prescott 3.0GHz, ASUS P4C800ED, 512MB DDR PC3200, kernl 2.6.16.14:
| Code: |
thorax:~$ glxgears
21575 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4314.889 FPS
21637 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4327.270 FPS
21613 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4322.398 FPS
21592 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4317.828 FPS
21656 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4331.064 FPS
21648 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4329.493 FPS
21634 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4326.732 FPS
|
_________________
ATI Radeon HD 3650 512MB, 2048 MB DDR PC3200, Intel Pentium 4E 3.0GHz, Abit IS-7E, Plextor PX712A 1.09, 2xSeagate Barracuda st3500320as, Intel PRO 100; Gentoo ~x86 Linux 2.6.x vanilla, Registered Linux User No. 351604 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RedHiney
n00b
Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 19
Location: Townsville
|
| Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Zaczynam dochodzić do wniosku, że moja konfiguracje nie jest za specjalna.
AMD Athlon64 3000+, 512 DDR, GA-K8NSC-939, GF6600 128MB i:
| Code: | 13714 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2742.800 FPS
13849 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2769.800 FPS
14117 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2823.400 FPS
14142 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2828.400 FPS
14041 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2808.200 FPS
13730 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2746.000 FPS
13719 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2743.800 FPS
15469 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3093.800 FPS
23000 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4600.000 FPS
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Yatmai
Veteran
Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 1501
Location: Kraków
|
| Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
W prawdzie glxgears to żaden tester z prawdziwego zdarzenia, jednak co zauważyłem, po przejściu z X'ów na Xgl, moje wyniki wzrosły do 70% :]
_________________
Desktop: [Ath64 X2 2GB DDR2 GF76GT] [amd64] [2.6.29-gentoo] [nVidia] [KDE 3.5.10]
Lapek: [HP nc6000] [i686] [2.6.29-ARCH] [ati-open] [KDE 3.5.10] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RedHiney
n00b
Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 19
Location: Townsville
|
| Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Miewałem, przez ostatnie tygodnie takie nieśmiałe myśli o przejściu na XGL, ale nie mogłem się przekonać. Myślę jednak, że spróbuję. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aktyn
l33t
Joined: 25 Dec 2005
Posts: 619
|
| Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Art.root wrote: | | W prawdzie glxgears to żaden tester z prawdziwego zdarzenia, jednak co zauważyłem, po przejściu z X'ów na Xgl, moje wyniki wzrosły do 70% :] |
Sorry że sie czepiam, wzrosły do 70% czyli spadły o 30% ?
_________________
Aktyn Pages
są ludzie inteligentni, są nad wyraz inteligentni i błyskotliwi, są jasnowidze, są wszechwiedzący bogowie, oraz ludzie piszący kompilatory |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ukl
Apprentice
Joined: 05 Mar 2005
Posts: 228
Location: /dev/null
|
| Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To i ja coś dorzucę:
Toshiba L20-183 (grafika VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RC410 [Radeon Xpress 200M])
| Code: | ukl@klapek ~ $ glxgears
4280 frames in 5.0 seconds = 855.879 FPS
4249 frames in 5.0 seconds = 849.787 FPS
4256 frames in 5.0 seconds = 851.196 FPS
4244 frames in 5.0 seconds = 848.732 FPS
4253 frames in 5.0 seconds = 850.432 FPS
|
Uważam, że jak na lapka z tej półki cenowej to wynik całkiem ciekawy
_________________
Pozdrawiam
Paweł |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Yatmai
Veteran
Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 1501
Location: Kraków
|
| Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Aktyn wrote: | | Sorry że sie czepiam, wzrosły do 70% czyli spadły o 30% ? |
Głupia literówka, poprawnie jest, że wzrosły o 70%
Swoją drogą, udało mi się przed chwilą nabić:
| Code: | 275495 frames in 5.0 seconds = 55092.566 FPS
276622 frames in 5.0 seconds = 55315.465 FPS
275621 frames in 5.0 seconds = 55124.188 FPS
275241 frames in 5.0 seconds = 55032.723 FPS
275118 frames in 5.0 seconds = 55015.805 FPS
|
_________________
Desktop: [Ath64 X2 2GB DDR2 GF76GT] [amd64] [2.6.29-gentoo] [nVidia] [KDE 3.5.10]
Lapek: [HP nc6000] [i686] [2.6.29-ARCH] [ati-open] [KDE 3.5.10] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kurt Steiner
Bodhisattva
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 1050
Location: Ostroleka, Polska
|
| Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Art.root wrote: | Swoją drogą, udało mi się przed chwilą nabić:
| Code: | 275495 frames in 5.0 seconds = 55092.566 FPS
276622 frames in 5.0 seconds = 55315.465 FPS
275621 frames in 5.0 seconds = 55124.188 FPS
275241 frames in 5.0 seconds = 55032.723 FPS
275118 frames in 5.0 seconds = 55015.805 FPS
|
|
Oszukiwacz.  Jak okienko zminimalizuje to i mój Intelek się nagle demonem prędkości robi... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Yatmai
Veteran
Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 1501
Location: Kraków
|
| Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No co Też się chce dowartościować, zwłaszcza, że niektórzy tutaj na słabszym sprzęcie mają lepsze wyniki... :/
Swoją drogą, może by pozbierać kilka złotych myśli dotyczących tego jak poprawić wydajność graficzną...
Jak choćby, użyć agpagart czy nvidia's agp support
_________________
Desktop: [Ath64 X2 2GB DDR2 GF76GT] [amd64] [2.6.29-gentoo] [nVidia] [KDE 3.5.10]
Lapek: [HP nc6000] [i686] [2.6.29-ARCH] [ati-open] [KDE 3.5.10] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Polskie forum (Polish) 
