View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gogiel Guru
Joined: 11 Nov 2004 Posts: 347
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mam problem z wlaczeniem Fast Writes. Zarowno plyta glowna jak i karta obsluguja FW.
/etc/modules.d/nvidia wrote: |
options nvidia NVreg_EnableAGPSBA=1 NVreg_EnableAGPFW=1 |
W /etc/modules.autoload.d/kernel-2.6 mam dopisane automatyczne ladowanie nvidii.
Probowalem rowniez dopisac:
/etc/X11/xorg.conf wrote: |
Option "AGPFastWrite" "true"
|
ale nic z tego. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
(l)user Guru
Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 334 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gogiel wrote: | Mam problem z wlaczeniem Fast Writes. Zarowno plyta glowna jak i karta obsluguja FW. |
Pokaz co pokazuje
Code: |
cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/card
|
i
Code: |
cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/status
|
_________________ Registered Linux user #302020
Gadu Gadu #490092 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gogiel Guru
Joined: 11 Nov 2004 Posts: 347
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | gogiel@gogiel gogiel $ cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/card
Fast Writes: Supported
SBA: Supported
AGP Rates: 8x 4x
Registers: 0x1f000e1b:0x1f004302
gogiel@gogiel gogiel $ cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/status
Status: Enabled
Driver: NVIDIA
AGP Rate: 8x
Fast Writes: Disabled
SBA: Enabled |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
(l)user Guru
Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 334 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sprobuj zorbic to w ten sposob:
1) rozpakuj instalke nvidii:
Code: |
#sh NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1.run --extract-only
|
2)Wyedytuj plikg os-registry.c - zmien "static int NVreg_EnableAGPFW = 0" na "static int NVreg_EnableAGPFW = 1"
Code: |
#cd NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/
#vi os-registry.c
|
3)Zainstaluj stery ponownie
Code: |
#cd ../../../
#./nvidia-installer
|
_________________ Registered Linux user #302020
Gadu Gadu #490092 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gogiel Guru
Joined: 11 Nov 2004 Posts: 347
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
(l)user wrote: | Sprobuj zorbic to w ten sposob:
1) rozpakuj instalke nvidii:
Code: |
#sh NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1.run --extract-only
|
2)Wyedytuj plikg os-registry.c - zmien "static int NVreg_EnableAGPFW = 0" na "static int NVreg_EnableAGPFW = 1"
Code: |
#cd NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/
#vi os-registry.c
|
3)Zainstaluj stery ponownie
Code: |
#cd ../../../
#./nvidia-installer
|
|
A da sie to jakos zrobic przez emerge? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
(l)user Guru
Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 334 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gogiel wrote: |
A da sie to jakos zrobic przez emerge? |
Musialbys po edycji pliku ponownie to skompresowac do pierwotnej postaci - nie wiem jak to zrobic, ale z pewnoscia sie da. Potem musialbys wrzucic instalke do /usr/portage/distfiles oraz usunac i ponownie utworzyc digesty od nvidia-kernel i nvidia-glx _________________ Registered Linux user #302020
Gadu Gadu #490092 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gogiel Guru
Joined: 11 Nov 2004 Posts: 347
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Problem rozwiazany.
Zmienilem /etc/modules.autoload.d/kernel-2.6 z
na Code: | nvidia NVreg_EnableAGPFW=1 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
l_bratch Guru
Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 494 Location: Jersey
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | 58978 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11795.600 FPS
57710 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11542.000 FPS
50774 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10154.800 FPS
51193 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10238.600 FPS
51143 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10228.600 FPS
51159 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10231.800 FPS
51218 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10243.600 FPS
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gogiel Guru
Joined: 11 Nov 2004 Posts: 347
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
l_bratch wrote: | Quote: | 58978 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11795.600 FPS
57710 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11542.000 FPS
50774 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10154.800 FPS
51193 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10238.600 FPS
51143 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10228.600 FPS
51159 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10231.800 FPS
51218 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10243.600 FPS
|
|
Moglbys przynajniej napisac co to za karta ;\ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
l_bratch Guru
Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 494 Location: Jersey
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can you repeat that in English? I tried to translate what you said but it didn't work.
Attempted translation:
Quote: | Może wy powtarzacie co w Języku angielskim? spróbuję (wypróbował) tłumaczyć co wy ale to *did't* praca (pracować; roboczy). |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gogiel Guru
Joined: 11 Nov 2004 Posts: 347
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
l_bratch wrote: | Can you repeat that in English? I tried to translate what you said but it didn't work.
Attempted translation:
Quote: | Może wy powtarzacie co w Języku angielskim? spróbuję (wypróbował) tłumaczyć co wy ale to *did't* praca (pracować; roboczy). |
|
It's Polish forum - we talk in polish here.
Quote: |
Moglbys przynajniej napisac co to za karta ;\ |
I asked there, what card do you have |
|
Back to top |
|
|
l_bratch Guru
Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 494 Location: Jersey
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, was just posting my score
I have a Geforce 6800 128MB. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lazy_bum l33t
Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 691
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cel 2.4, 256 DDR @ 266MHz, GF2MX100 32MB:
Code: | 1482 frames in 5.0 seconds = 296.400 FPS
1262 frames in 5.0 seconds = 252.400 FPS
1369 frames in 5.0 seconds = 273.800 FPS
1440 frames in 5.0 seconds = 288.000 FPS
1507 frames in 5.0 seconds = 301.400 FPS
1395 frames in 5.0 seconds = 279.000 FPS
1207 frames in 5.0 seconds = 241.400 FPS
1468 frames in 5.0 seconds = 293.600 FPS
1535 frames in 5.0 seconds = 307.000 FPS |
Muszę tą niespecjalnie_ciekawą (-; grafę w końcu wywalić.
Po włączeniu FastWrites i SBA (co dziwne oba obsługiwane przez mobo, a nic przez karte) wyniki:
Code: | 2028 frames in 5.0 seconds = 405.600 FPS
2026 frames in 5.0 seconds = 405.200 FPS
2005 frames in 5.0 seconds = 401.000 FPS
2047 frames in 5.0 seconds = 409.400 FPS
2037 frames in 5.0 seconds = 407.400 FPS
2044 frames in 5.0 seconds = 408.800 FPS
2053 frames in 5.0 seconds = 410.600 FPS |
Nadal na tym samym ,sprzęcie'. (-; |
|
Back to top |
|
|
totencham Apprentice
Joined: 05 Dec 2004 Posts: 299 Location: Szczecin, Poland
|
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Matrox G400 32MB, Pentium III 650MHz:
Code: | 1879 frames in 5.0 seconds = 375.800 FPS
1879 frames in 5.0 seconds = 375.800 FPS
1879 frames in 5.0 seconds = 375.800 FPS
1880 frames in 5.0 seconds = 376.000 FPS
1878 frames in 5.0 seconds = 375.600 FPS
1879 frames in 5.0 seconds = 375.800 FPS
1878 frames in 5.0 seconds = 375.600 FPS
1879 frames in 5.0 seconds = 375.800 FPS
1874 frames in 5.0 seconds = 374.800 FPS
1879 frames in 5.0 seconds = 375.800 FPS
|
_________________ http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Index
cd /usr/src/linux && egrep -ir "( fuck)|( shit)" *
Linux registered user #376896 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JarekG Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jan 2005 Posts: 160 Location: Poland | Birmingham [UK]
|
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GF 2 MX400 32 MB, AXP 2500+
Code: |
3877 frames in 5.0 seconds = 775.400 FPS
4599 frames in 5.0 seconds = 919.800 FPS
4595 frames in 5.0 seconds = 919.000 FPS
4600 frames in 5.0 seconds = 920.000 FPS
12813 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2562.600 FPS
18407 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3681.400 FPS
24095 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4819.000 FPS
24280 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4856.000 FPS
23821 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4764.200 FPS
23989 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4797.800 FPS
|
Niezly rozstrzal . _________________ Pozdrawiam
Jarosław Grząbel
HERE I AM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dawid159 Guru
Joined: 28 Jun 2004 Posts: 414 Location: /dev/Kłodzko
|
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A przypadkiem nie zmieniłeś rozmiaru okna, zminimalizowałeś go lub przysłoniłeś innym oknem Bo jest za duża różnica |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zieloo Veteran
Joined: 28 Mar 2004 Posts: 1337
|
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1710 frames in 5.0 seconds = 342.000 FPS
1914 frames in 5.0 seconds = 382.800 FPS
1893 frames in 5.0 seconds = 378.600 FPS
2117 frames in 5.0 seconds = 423.400 FPS
2192 frames in 5.0 seconds = 438.400 FPS
Na chipsecie i865GV (grafika zintegrowana na plycie [!]) z 32 pamieci na pokladzie, na procku jak ponizej... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JarekG Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jan 2005 Posts: 160 Location: Poland | Birmingham [UK]
|
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 6:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dawid159 wrote: | A przypadkiem nie zmieniłeś rozmiaru okna, zminimalizowałeś go lub przysłoniłeś innym oknem Bo jest za duża różnica |
No wlasnie mnie to tez dziwilo . A czy cos robilem... chyba zaczalem pisac posta na forum. Faktycznie drugi wynik przy lampieniu sie w wyniki daje srednia 900 .
Code: |
3807 frames in 5.0 seconds = 761.400 FPS
4240 frames in 5.0 seconds = 848.000 FPS
4551 frames in 5.0 seconds = 910.200 FPS
4536 frames in 5.0 seconds = 907.200 FPS
4554 frames in 5.0 seconds = 910.800 FPS
4552 frames in 5.0 seconds = 910.400 FPS
4554 frames in 5.0 seconds = 910.800 FPS
4555 frames in 5.0 seconds = 911.000 FPS
4551 frames in 5.0 seconds = 910.200 FPS
4557 frames in 5.0 seconds = 911.400 FPS
|
_________________ Pozdrawiam
Jarosław Grząbel
HERE I AM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
re- n00b
Joined: 08 Mar 2005 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dla malego porownania powiem, ze jak instalowalem gentoo robilem to z pod auroxa - akurat lezal w zaprzyjaznionym kiosku
Tak jak na gentoo glxgears daje wyniki rzedu 1100-1200 tak na auroxie dawal 200-230 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JarekG Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jan 2005 Posts: 160 Location: Poland | Birmingham [UK]
|
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
re- wrote: | Dla malego porownania powiem, ze jak instalowalem gentoo robilem to z pod auroxa - akurat lezal w zaprzyjaznionym kiosku
Tak jak na gentoo glxgears daje wyniki rzedu 1100-1200 tak na auroxie dawal 200-230 |
Stwierdzam, ze moduly nvidia miales w kernelu, ale moze nie bylo nvidia-glx. Mi bez opengl-update tez wyciaga gora 300. _________________ Pozdrawiam
Jarosław Grząbel
HERE I AM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Criss-PL Apprentice
Joined: 07 Mar 2005 Posts: 158 Location: Szczecin
|
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
A moze ktos pokusie się i da jakiegos configa do ATI (ale dobrego)... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
argasek Bodhisattva
Joined: 06 May 2004 Posts: 1121 Location: Sol [0,0], Poland, Kraków
|
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Do ATi (przynajmniej do FGLRX) nie ma 'dobrego configa', bo ogółem jeśli chodzi o prędkość, to sterowniki są nadal słabe. Pod wzgledem ficzerów zaczyna być nie najgorzej... _________________ RLU #137109 | http://soundcloud.com/argasek |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dawid159 Guru
Joined: 28 Jun 2004 Posts: 414 Location: /dev/Kłodzko
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | 4745 frames in 5.0 seconds = 949.000 FPS
4864 frames in 5.0 seconds = 972.800 FPS
4846 frames in 5.0 seconds = 969.200 FPS
4838 frames in 5.0 seconds = 967.600 FPS
4854 frames in 5.0 seconds = 970.800 FPS
4849 frames in 5.0 seconds = 969.800 FPS
4844 frames in 5.0 seconds = 968.800 FPS
4863 frames in 5.0 seconds = 972.600 FPS
4836 frames in 5.0 seconds = 967.200 FPS
4833 frames in 5.0 seconds = 966.600 FPS
|
GF4 MX 420
Nowy kernelek (2.6.12-rc1-love1) i 200 FPS więcej, nieźle czyli jeszcze pewnie uda mi się polepszyć ten wynik |
|
Back to top |
|
|
m@niac! Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Jan 2005 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
po malych kombinacjach poprawilem osiagi
Code: | 13842 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2768.400 FPS
14906 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2981.200 FPS
14852 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2970.400 FPS
14970 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2994.000 FPS
14963 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2992.600 FPS
|
geForceFX 5200 128DDR (core+25MHz mem +50MHz) [athlon XP-M 2500+@3400+/256DDR/nForce2SPP/xorg6.8.2-r1/latest driver/kernel2.6.11-5]
SBA/FW/nvAGP8x
a jak powylaczam przezroczystosci w kde i pozamykam wszystkie pootwierane okienka to jest ponad 3000 _________________ linux is like a wigwam - no windows, no gates, with an apache inside
Last edited by m@niac! on Fri Mar 25, 2005 10:29 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
adam1957 Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 Aug 2004 Posts: 121
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cześć !!
Code: | 14267 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2853.400 FPS
14337 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2867.400 FPS
14345 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2869.000 FPS
14351 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2870.200 FPS
14345 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2869.000 FPS
14341 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2868.200 FPS
14347 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2869.400 FPS
14348 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2869.600 FPS
13231 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2646.200 FPS |
Sempron 2500; FX5200-128bit; nForce2;
xorg-6.8.2; najnowższe stery nVidii. _________________ Linux Registered User #376200
Gentoo2007.0
Mowa jest srebrem, a milczenie złotem |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|