| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
flakusiek
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 83
Location: Gdansk[PL]
|
 Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 10:03 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Code: | 11619 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2323.800 FPS
11630 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2326.000 FPS
11629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2325.800 FPS
11640 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2328.000 FPS
11625 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2325.000 FPS
11629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2325.800 FPS
11629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2325.800 FPS
11643 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2328.600 FPS
11631 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2326.200 FPS
11629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2325.800 FPS |
Xorg.conf | Code: | # === ATI device section ===
Section "Device"
Identifier "ATI Graphics Adapter"
Driver "fglrx"
# ### generic DRI settings ###
# === disable PnP Monitor ===
#Option "NoDDC"
# === disable/enable XAA/DRI ===
Option "no_accel" "no"
Option "no_dri" "no"
# === misc DRI settings ===
Option "mtrr" "on" # disable DRI mtrr mapper, driver has its own code for mtrr
# ### FireGL DDX driver module specific settings ###
# === Screen Management ===
Option "DesktopSetup" "0x00000000"
Option "MonitorLayout" "AUTO, AUTO"
Option "IgnoreEDID" "off"
Option "HSync2" "unspecified"
Option "VRefresh2" "unspecified"
Option "ScreenOverlap" "0"
# === TV-out Management ===
Option "NoTV" "yes"
Option "TVStandard" "NTSC-M"
Option "TVHSizeAdj" "0"
Option "TVVSizeAdj" "0"
Option "TVHPosAdj" "0"
Option "TVVPosAdj" "0"
Option "TVHStartAdj" "0"
Option "TVColorAdj" "0"
Option "GammaCorrectionI" "0x06419064"
Option "GammaCorrectionII" "0x00000000"
# === OpenGL specific profiles/settings ===
Option "Capabilities" "0x00000000"
# === Video Overlay for the Xv extension ===
Option "VideoOverlay" "on"
# === OpenGL Overlay ===
# Note: When OpenGL Overlay is enabled, Video Overlay
# will be disabled automatically
Option "OpenGLOverlay" "off"
# === Center Mode (Laptops only) ===
Option "CenterMode" "off"
# === Pseudo Color Visuals (8-bit visuals) ===
Option "PseudoColorVisuals" "off"
# === QBS Management ===
Option "Stereo" "off"
Option "StereoSyncEnable" "1"
# === FSAA Management ===
Option "FSAAEnable" "no"
Option "FSAAScale" "1"
Option "FSAADisableGamma" "no"
Option "FSAACustomizeMSPos" "no"
Option "FSAAMSPosX0" "0.000000"
Option "FSAAMSPosY0" "0.000000"
Option "FSAAMSPosX1" "0.000000"
Option "FSAAMSPosY1" "0.000000"
Option "FSAAMSPosX2" "0.000000"
Option "FSAAMSPosY2" "0.000000"
Option "FSAAMSPosX3" "0.000000"
Option "FSAAMSPosY3" "0.000000"
Option "FSAAMSPosX4" "0.000000"
Option "FSAAMSPosY4" "0.000000"
Option "FSAAMSPosX5" "0.000000"
Option "FSAAMSPosY5" "0.000000"
# === Misc Options ===
Option "UseFastTLS" "2"
Option "BlockSignalsOnLock" "on"
Option "UseInternalAGPGART" "no"
Option "ForceGenericCPU" "no"
BusID "PCI:1:0:0" # vendor=1002, device=514d
Screen 0
EndSection |
Nie wiem czemu tak słabo :/ ... ludzie wykręcają więcej na gf5200 :/
Coś byście poprawili ??[/quote]
_________________
HP Compaq nc6000
Linux Registered User : #385414 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raku
Bodhisattva
Joined: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 2374
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
doklejam moje wyniki:
| Code: |
raku@demon ~ $ glxgears
8128 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1625.600 FPS
8979 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1795.800 FPS
8895 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1779.000 FPS
8990 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1798.000 FPS
8857 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1771.400 FPS
8987 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1797.400 FPS
raku@demon ~ $ fgl_glxgears
1574 frames in 5.0 seconds = 314.800 FPS
1585 frames in 5.0 seconds = 317.000 FPS
1643 frames in 5.0 seconds = 328.600 FPS
1606 frames in 5.0 seconds = 321.200 FPS
1644 frames in 5.0 seconds = 328.800 FPS
|
radeon 9550, ati-drivers 8.12.10, Athlon XP 1600+
EDIT:
| Code: |
raku@demon ~ $ glxgears
7556 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1511.200 FPS
9081 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1816.200 FPS
9076 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1815.200 FPS
9098 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1819.600 FPS
9028 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1805.600 FPS
9095 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1819.000 FPS
9108 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1821.600 FPS
9107 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1821.400 FPS
9046 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1809.200 FPS
9094 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1818.800 FPS
Przerwany potok
raku@demon ~ $ fgl_glxgears
1371 frames in 5.0 seconds = 274.200 FPS
1619 frames in 5.0 seconds = 323.800 FPS
1607 frames in 5.0 seconds = 321.400 FPS
1612 frames in 5.0 seconds = 322.400 FPS
1602 frames in 5.0 seconds = 320.400 FPS
1617 frames in 5.0 seconds = 323.400 FPS
|
więcej już chyba nie wycisnę :-/
to zaledwie 200 więcej niz mój stary GF2 Ti
_________________
raku
Powered by Archlinux  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rebus
n00b
Joined: 10 Sep 2004
Posts: 61
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
11472 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2294.400 FPS
11356 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2271.200 FPS
11283 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2256.600 FPS
11227 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2245.400 FPS
11253 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2250.600 FPS
11239 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2247.800 FPS
11282 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2256.400 FPS
11239 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2247.800 FPS
11217 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2243.400 FPS
11235 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2247.000 FPS
11305 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2261.000 FPS
11278 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2255.600 FPS
11242 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2248.400 FPS
--------------
athlon 9,5x166=1577MHz na Abicie NF7 pamięś hyper karta 5200FX Gentoo 2005.0 KDE
ustwienia systemu podstawowe bez optymalizacji - wyniki uważam dobre z uwagi na
ustawienia biosu - myślę że jak będzie czas to podkręce w systemie ale na FXe więcej niż 3000nie wyciągne
zawsze były zbliżone na innych sysach
jestem ciekaw czy na Gnome Ice lub innym wyniki inne |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
joker
l33t
Joined: 03 May 2003
Posts: 681
Location: www
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
nie ma co porownywac wynikiw miedzy nvidia a ati pod linux'em, takze nie przejmujcie sie ze macie gorsze wyniki na ati niz na nvidi mimo ze karta jest lepsza. chill out
_________________
http://amarok.org.pl | http://koffice.org.pl | http://kde.org.pl |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raku
Bodhisattva
Joined: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 2374
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
odświeżyłem ten wątek nie po to, aby porównywać ati z nvidią (choć niemile się zaskoczyłem), ale aby sprawdzić, czy mój r9550 nie odstaje przypadkiem od innych.
_________________
raku
Powered by Archlinux |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wojtek
n00b
Joined: 19 Mar 2005
Posts: 65
Location: Krakow/Pszczyna, Poland
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | 37241 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7448.200 FPS
47394 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9478.800 FPS
47246 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9449.200 FPS
47502 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9500.400 FPS
47418 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9483.600 FPS
47511 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9502.200 FPS
47479 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9495.800 FPS
47512 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9502.400 FPS
47499 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9499.800 FPS
47364 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9472.800 FPS |
Athlon 3000+ (10,5*200Mhz), 512MB RAM DualDDR GeIL @ 400MHz, GeForce 6800 (Gigabyte), Abit NF7-S 2.0
i moje prywatne zdanie: glxgears to żaden benchmark...
Last edited by wojtek on Fri Apr 29, 2005 8:24 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pwe
Guru
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 445
Location: Polska aka Poland
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wojtek wrote: |
Athlon 3000+ (11*200Mhz), 512MB RAM DualDDR GeIL @ 400MHz, GeForce 6800 (Gigabyte), Abit NF7-S 2.0
i moje prywatne zdanie: glxgears to żaden benchmark... |
11x200Mhz -> to Athlon 3200+ czyli Barton 2200Mhz |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cichy
Apprentice
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 217
Location: Jasionówka/podlaskie/Poland
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wojtek wrote: |
i moje prywatne zdanie: glxgears to żaden benchmark... |
Zgadzam sie z tym. Na linuksie nie ma benchmarka 3d jako takiego. Od biedy mozna podciagnac pod ten termin niektore gry...
Zadaniem glxgears jest pokazanie tylko ze akceleracja 3d dziala
Pozdrawiam
_________________
::Gentoo::Linux::(athlon-xp // amd64 // pentium-m // nocona)::ID:387704::
Last edited by cichy on Fri Apr 29, 2005 8:40 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wojtek
n00b
Joined: 19 Mar 2005
Posts: 65
Location: Krakow/Pszczyna, Poland
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pwe wrote: | | 11x200Mhz -> to Athlon 3200+ czyli Barton 2200Mhz |
Racja, pisalem z pamięci i jeszcze raz zajrzałem do BIOSu, oczywiście miałem na myśli mnożnik 10,5 czyli 2100MHz - już poprawiłem. Swoją drogą miałem duży dylemat czy standardowe 11,5 * 166Mhz nie byłoby szybsze (bo to o 66MHz więcej), ale jak zrobiłem kilka testowych kompilacji to okazało się, że jednak przepustowość pamięci wzięła górę. Nie należę do bloody oveclockers ale, małe usprawnienia jak najbardziej... .
| cichy wrote: | Zgadzam sie z tym. Na linuksie nie benchmarka 3d jako takiego. Od biedy mozna podciagnac pod ten termin niektore gry...
Zadaniem glxgears jest pokazanie tylko ze akceleracja 3d dziala |
Myślę, że Unreal Tornament 2003/2004 (i jego darmowa wersja w postaci America's Army, albo wersji demo), Doom3, czy nawet ostatecznie Enemy Territory to całkiem bogaty zestaw oprogramowania testowego. Mam mieszane uczucia co do windowsowych 3DMarków, ponieważ są pisane specjalnie do testów, i niekoniecznie odzwierciedlają potrzeby konkretnych silników 3D - a w końcu to one są tym produktem, dla których kupujemy karty 3D. Jeśli się popatrzy na testy na różnych stronach to to co wynika z 3DMarka często się nie pokrywa z tym co osiągają konkretne tytuły gier. Bodajże XBit Labs (ale nie jestem pewien czy dobrze pamiętam) jest generalnie anty 3DMarkowy i można się spotkać z opiniami, że ten benchmark bywa wykorzystywany bardziej jako propaganda (specjalne optymalizacje w driverach dla niego) niż rzeczywiste źródło obiektywnej informacji.
Tym którzy są zainteresowani ciekawym narzędziem dla Linuksa do testowania wydajności swoich kart polecam AnandTech-owego FrameGettera. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mihashi
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 08 Apr 2005
Posts: 98
Location: Wroclaw, Poland
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | michal@argos ~ $ glxgears
17982 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3596.400 FPS
18574 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3714.800 FPS
18566 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3713.200 FPS
18575 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3715.000 FPS
18582 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3716.400 FPS
18575 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3715.000 FPS
18564 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3712.800 FPS
18549 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3709.800 FPS
18574 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3714.800 FPS
18571 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3714.200 FPS
|
Konfig:
- cpu: Athlon XP 2000@2800 (FSB333), 40C - AIUHB
- grafa: GeForce4 4200 (niekręcona, niemodowana)
- ram: Kingston 512M (FSB333, 2.5 LC)
- mobo: Asus A7V8X deluxe
- hdd: WDC WD800LB
- psu: Codegen 300X
_________________
Mihashi |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
13Homer
Guru
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 461
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pięć pierwszych jest z fokusem na oknie z trybami:
18891 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3778.200 FPS
19579 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3915.800 FPS
19580 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3916.000 FPS
19580 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3916.000 FPS
19579 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3915.800 FPS
drugie pięć z fokusem w innym oknie (xtermie):
51820 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10364.000 FPS
58710 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11742.000 FPS
58842 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11768.400 FPS
58821 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11764.200 FPS
58833 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11766.600 FPS
_________________
Lenovo ThinkPad R61 / C2D@2.6.24 / nVidia Quatro NVS 140M / 2 GB RAM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Klekot
Apprentice
Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Posts: 152
Location: Poznań
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | [klekot@hawudepe ~] fgl_glxgears
Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer
3279 frames in 5.0 seconds = 655.800 FPS
5157 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1031.400 FPS
5173 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1034.600 FPS
5159 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1031.800 FPS
5173 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1034.600 FPS
5150 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1030.000 FPS
[klekot@hawudepe ~] glxgears
28439 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5687.800 FPS
29995 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5999.000 FPS
30089 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6017.800 FPS
20982 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6019.400 FPS
25568 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5998.600 FPS
30062 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6012.400 FPS
[klekot@hawudepe ~] |
radeon 9700p. 512ddr. p4 1.6ghz
_________________
Ragga, ragga, ragga y0!
with a510 (; |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BeteNoire
Veteran
Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 1827
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hm... czy u mnie coś jest nie tak?
1280x1024@75Hz:
| Code: | 4585 frames in 5.0 seconds = 917.000 FPS
4593 frames in 5.0 seconds = 918.600 FPS
4607 frames in 5.0 seconds = 921.400 FPS |
1024x768@85Hz:
| Code: | 4963 frames in 5.0 seconds = 992.600 FPS
4994 frames in 5.0 seconds = 998.800 FPS
4994 frames in 5.0 seconds = 998.800 FPS |
GF FX 5200, AthlonXP 2400...
A może przyznajcie się, że okienko glxgears zmniejszacie maksymalnie, bo tak to ja mam osiągi:
| Code: | 48678 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9735.600 FPS
51668 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10333.600 FPS
54638 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10927.600 FPS |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rasheed
Guru
Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Posts: 466
Location: Ostrów Wielkopolski
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BeteNoire wrote: | | Hm... czy u mnie coś jest nie tak? |
Nie wydaje mi się. GF FX 5200 to po prostu gówno a nie karta graficzna (przepraszam za wyrażenie).
Pozdrawiam.
_________________
rasheed - #gentoo.pl@IRCnet team | www.mklimek.org - BLOG - Linux, Opera, Open Source | JID / Mail: rasheed@gentoo.pl
APEL! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rybirek
n00b
Joined: 09 May 2005
Posts: 16
Location: Warszawa
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: |
glxgears
6259 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1251.800 FPS
6259 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1251.800 FPS
6260 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1252.000 FPS
6261 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1252.200 FPS
|
| Code: |
fgl_glxgears
Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer
1244 frames in 5.0 seconds = 248.800 FPS
1255 frames in 5.0 seconds = 251.000 FPS
1240 frames in 5.0 seconds = 248.000 FPS
1241 frames in 5.0 seconds = 248.200 FPS
|
ATI Technologies Inc M22 [Radeon Mobility M300]
Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.86GHz
Rozdzielczość 1400x1050 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
adam1957
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 121
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cześć !!
| Code: |
1419 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2283.800 FPS
13386 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2677.200 FPS
13963 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2792.600 FPS
13962 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2792.400 FPS
13973 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2794.600 FPS
13951 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2790.200 FPS
13968 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2793.600 FPS
13967 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2793.400 FPS
13982 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2796.400 FPS
13987 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2797.400 FPS
13951 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2790.200 FPS |
Sempron 2500 GFX5200
_________________
Linux Registered User #376200
Gentoo2007.0
Mowa jest srebrem, a milczenie złotem |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
brodi
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 100
Location: EU, Poland, Lodz
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Moje 0,03PLN:
| Code: |
lucas@skynet ~ $ glxgears
5306 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1061.200 FPS
6620 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1324.000 FPS
6604 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1320.800 FPS
6395 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1279.000 FPS
6527 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1305.400 FPS
6620 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1324.000 FPS
|
GeForce 2MX 400 32RAM
_________________
Łukasz
"Linux - because it works!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Klekot
Apprentice
Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Posts: 152
Location: Poznań
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jak sobie zmniejszam okienko od glxgear to z 6000 podskakuje mi na 14000 ;]
_________________
Ragga, ragga, ragga y0!
with a510 (; |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gabrys
Veteran
Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 1096
Location: Toruń [PL]
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jeśli konkurs na najgorszy wynik jest cały czas aktualny:
| Code: | 47 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9.334 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9.922 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9.934 FPS
50 frames in 5.1 seconds = 9.901 FPS
50 frames in 5.1 seconds = 9.840 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9.978 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9.930 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9.934 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9.972 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9.932 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9.922 FPS
50 frames in 5.1 seconds = 9.840 FPS
50 frames in 5.1 seconds = 9.869 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9.982 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9.936 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9.926 FPS |
na sprzęcie, który zaraz sobie wrzucę do podpisu.
EDIT: (bo widzę, że nie działa)
Linux 2.6.13-gentoo-r5, X.org 6.9.0 RC2 (nvidia 1.0.8174), Qt 3.3.4, KDE 3.4.3, Kadu 0.4.3
MSI KT4AV, AMD Sempron 2800+, GeForce4 MX440 (128bit) 64MB, 512MB DDRAM 333MHz |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Woocash
Guru
Joined: 01 May 2004
Posts: 525
Location: Poland, Praszka
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | 66409 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13281.800 FPS
66403 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13280.600 FPS
66412 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13282.400 FPS
66438 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13287.600 FPS
65851 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13170.200 FPS |
Gf6800GT
AMD64 3000+
_________________
"When a man lies he murders some part of the world
These are pale deaths which men miscall their lives
All this I cannot bear to witness any longer
Cannot the kingdom of salvation take me home..."
Cliff Burton |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raku
Bodhisattva
Joined: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 2374
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Przełom w sterach ATI????
| Code: |
11225 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2245.000 FPS
13619 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2723.800 FPS
13489 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2697.800 FPS
13612 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2722.400 FPS
13537 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2707.400 FPS
13552 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2710.400 FPS
13497 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2699.400 FPS
|
Radeon 9550, ati-drivers 8.20.8, Athlon XP 1600+. Porównajcie z moim poprzednim wynikiem podanym kilka postów wyżej !!!!
Na 8.19.10 miałem coś koło 2000
_________________
raku
Powered by Archlinux |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tswiercz
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Dec 2004
Posts: 106
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ja na mym radku 9550@325/450 albo jakoś tak mam: ( 8.20.8 )
| Code: | tswiercz@localhost$ tswiercz$ glxgears
14582 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2916.400 FPS
16239 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3247.800 FPS
16253 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3250.600 FPS
16256 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3251.200 FPS
16251 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3250.200 FPS
16257 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3251.400 FPS
|
i chyba UT2004 też lepiej działa. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nigdydosc
n00b
Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 38
Location: Jaroslaw, Poland
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | glxgears
24851 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4970.200 FPS
35998 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7199.600 FPS
36278 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7255.600 FPS
36965 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7393.000 FPS
36524 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7304.800 FPS
36898 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7379.600 FPS
|
Athlon XP 1.7, 1GB Ram'u Sparkle GF 6600 GT 128 MB
_________________
Miejsce na Twoją reklamę. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KonMan
n00b
Joined: 13 Sep 2005
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | 22090 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4418.000 FPS
24033 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4806.600 FPS
22867 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4573.400 FPS
34018 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6803.600 FPS
34425 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6885.000 FPS
34899 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6979.800 FPS
32495 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6499.000 FPS
37611 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7522.200 FPS
35102 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7020.400 FPS
37411 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7482.200 FPS |
@ Athlon 64 3200+, 1GB Geil 400 Mhz, GeForce 6600
Aktualizacja, po zemergowaniu modularnego Xorg 7:
| Code: | 38333 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7666.577 FPS
39275 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7837.796 FPS
39392 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7878.223 FPS
39405 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7880.820 FPS
38949 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7789.764 FPS
39408 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7881.423 FPS
39375 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7874.869 FPS
39265 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7852.808 FPS
39139 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7827.663 FPS
39243 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7848.566 FPS
39373 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7874.588 FPS
39415 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7882.974 FPS |
)
Last edited by KonMan on Tue Feb 14, 2006 12:37 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sebad
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 06 Oct 2005
Posts: 130
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | gentos sebad # glxgears
12997 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2599.400 FPS
15641 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3128.200 FPS
15654 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3130.800 FPS
15656 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3131.200 FPS
15652 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3130.400 FPS
15656 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3131.200 FPS
15602 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3120.400 FPS |
Radeon 9550XT ,Sempron(Barton)3000+ ,1024Ram 400Mhz(Kingston)
| Quote: | | Przełom w sterach ATI???? |
Cos w tym jest raku. Tez mam stery 8.20.8 ,a na starych mialem cos ok 500fps mniej.
_________________
Serwis komputerowy - Warszawa |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Polskie forum (Polish) 
