View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gandalf the White Guru
Joined: 17 Dec 2003 Posts: 320 Location: Verdun, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Apr 28, 2004 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah thanks, I made the post on campus and couldn't remember exactly what it was. Glad to see it worked and you were able to figure out what I was saying! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LeTene Guru
Joined: 02 Mar 2004 Posts: 348 Location: Ah'll glass ye!
|
Posted: Wed Apr 28, 2004 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
You can avoid having to do the nasty inject of XFree86 by using:
Code: |
emerge --nodeps nvidia-glx
|
One caveat - I'm not too sure how this will affect emerge -u world or emerge -U world of your system, but on mine it seems OK. _________________ Docs, Tips & Tricks at the Gentoo Wiki page. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gandalf the White Guru
Joined: 17 Dec 2003 Posts: 320 Location: Verdun, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Apr 28, 2004 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
@LeTene
That's another way of doing it for specific ebuilds, but(on my system at least), emerge -U world would still want to emerge xfree, by injecting it it no longer wants to do this, and I can emerge away no problems. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ard Righ Guru
Joined: 24 Jun 2002 Posts: 337 Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2004 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is it still the case that XFree needs to be injected to stop it from being installed ?
I thought with the latest package of Xorg, that XFree was blocked (the B that shows up), so that it won't install while Xorg is installed ?
I have xorg and gnome 2.6 installed on my PC. When I do a emerge -p kde, it doesn't list trying to install XFree ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioFL Guru
Joined: 31 Oct 2002 Posts: 407
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
oook I'm confused. What's the big bru-ha about xorg vs xfree? Is xorg supposed to be an order of magnitude better or some such? My system must be rock stable as I use it for work 99% of my day. The only thing I took a chance on was the 2.6.5 kernel which is working perfectly for me, presently using devfs, but in the next incarnation of this machine I intend to kill that and use udev. Will xorg be any better for me? I need extremely fast vid response, and sadly at the moment I still have some dropped frames in movies, and rendering is a bit slow which I attribute to the processors.
My machine is:
dual p3-933 procs on a tyan tiger 230T motherboard (Apollo Pro133T chipset), using a geforce4 Ti 4200 128mb and nvidia 4496 kernel and matching glx in twinview mode.
any ideas here?
Chuck |
|
Back to top |
|
|
moocha Watchman
Joined: 21 Oct 2003 Posts: 5722
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RioFL wrote: | oook I'm confused. What's the big bru-ha about xorg vs xfree? |
It's a licensing issue. Search the damn forum, that's why there's that search box smack on every page.
RioFL wrote: | Is xorg supposed to be an order of magnitude better or some such? |
No better and no worse than XFree86 4.3.99-someversion since it's a very recent fork of the XFree86 codebase - a fork of the last version under the old license.
RioFL wrote: | My system must be rock stable as I use it for work 99% of my day. |
Then you've just answered your own dilemma - if it must be stable, leave it alone. Duh. _________________ Military Commissions Act of 2006: http://tinyurl.com/jrcto
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- attributed to Benjamin Franklin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Negeus n00b
Joined: 10 Mar 2004 Posts: 26 Location: Norfolk, England
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 8:42 pm Post subject: Ugly fonts on kde after 'emerge nvidia-kernel nvidia-glx' |
|
|
All of the following takes place on a fresh installation (I was checking out kde before I emerged the nvidia packages and thats how I noticed the change)...
After emerging nvidia-kernel and nvidia-glx (had to inject xfree), I modified my /etc/X11/xorg.conf by uncommenting glx and changing nv to nvidia in the driver section for my gfx card. When I restarted X and logged back into kde I found that all my fonts were now big and ugly (I will post a screenshot if nessecary).
I had not changed one thing apart from what was mentioned above. It may be worth noting that the first time I tried restarting X it failed to start but everything was ok after a reboot.
If you would like me to post my entire xorg.conf or just certain sections then please say so. _________________ Bill meet Tux, Tux eat Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioFL Guru
Joined: 31 Oct 2002 Posts: 407
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 8:53 pm Post subject: Re: Ugly fonts on kde after 'emerge nvidia-kernel nvidia-glx |
|
|
Negeus wrote: | All of the following takes place on a fresh installation (I was checking out kde before I emerged the nvidia packages and thats how I noticed the change)...
After emerging nvidia-kernel and nvidia-glx (had to inject xfree), I modified my /etc/X11/xorg.conf by uncommenting glx and changing nv to nvidia in the driver section for my gfx card. When I restarted X and logged back into kde I found that all my fonts were now big and ugly (I will post a screenshot if nessecary).
I had not changed one thing apart from what was mentioned above. It may be worth noting that the first time I tried restarting X it failed to start but everything was ok after a reboot.
If you would like me to post my entire xorg.conf or just certain sections then please say so. |
It may be something else, but I had that same problem with xfree when I first installed it. Turned out my monitor was lying to the card (the interpretation of this was different with the latest xfree compared to the older version). This statement in the XF86Config device section for the vid card cured it, but it may or may not be so with your problem (could be different default fonts?) with xorg. It can't hurt to try it though.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Negeus n00b
Joined: 10 Mar 2004 Posts: 26 Location: Norfolk, England
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | It may be something else, but I had that same problem with xfree when I first installed it. Turned out my monitor was lying to the card (the interpretation of this was different with the latest xfree compared to the older version). This statement in the XF86Config device section for the vid card cured it, but it may or may not be so with your problem (could be different default fonts?) with xorg. It can't hurt to try it though. |
Well I cannot thank you enough, this fixed the problem!! Do you have a link that explains why this solution works, can you explain it yourself or will a simple forum search suffice?
What does the NoDDC option do? _________________ Bill meet Tux, Tux eat Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioFL Guru
Joined: 31 Oct 2002 Posts: 407
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Negeus wrote: | Quote: | It may be something else, but I had that same problem with xfree when I first installed it. Turned out my monitor was lying to the card (the interpretation of this was different with the latest xfree compared to the older version). This statement in the XF86Config device section for the vid card cured it, but it may or may not be so with your problem (could be different default fonts?) with xorg. It can't hurt to try it though. |
Well I cannot thank you enough, this fixed the problem!! Do you have a link that explains why this solution works, can you explain it yourself or will a simple forum search suffice?
What does the NoDDC option do? |
i found the info either on the nvidia site, or in the docs from a downloaded copy directly from nvidia one time.. it encompasses 2 other older options which i dont remember, but basically what it says to the nvidia kernel is "my monitor lies about itself. do not believe it. accept only what i tell you via my xf86config file and ignore the monitor's insane ravings"
that's basically it. one of my monitors swears it can only do 1024x768 but the monitor specs and my own experiments show it to handle 1600x1200 with ease. i dont know why, but it appears that the font changes from the default when the monitor is believed.
i am sure a proper technical explanation can be found on the nvidia site. i forgot most of that since this happened a while ago. i have been using that option for more than a year.
chuck |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Negeus n00b
Joined: 10 Mar 2004 Posts: 26 Location: Norfolk, England
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for that, the Nvidia readme confirms you have a good memory
Just in case anyone else is interested here are the relavent sections from the Nvidia drivers readme...
Quote: |
Option "NoDDC" "boolean"
Synonym for "IgnoreEDID"
|
Quote: |
HOW MODES ARE VALIDATED
During the PreInit phase of the X server, the NVIDIA X driver validates
all requested modes by doing the following:
o Take the intersection of the HorizSync and VertRefresh ranges given
by the user in the XF86Config with the ranges reported by the monitor
in the EDID (Extended Display Identification Data); this behavior
can be disabled by using the "IgnoreEDID" option in which case the
X driver will blindly accept the HorizSync and VertRefresh ranges
given by the user.
|
_________________ Bill meet Tux, Tux eat Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Duck-Billed Platypus Guru
Joined: 30 Jun 2003 Posts: 576 Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Shiryou wrote: | Yeah, i do have a little problem along these lines. I cant seem to get Xorg to run with the nvidia drivers. IT complains that it cant find the nvidia module, even though lsmod reprts that its actually loaded. I can only use the NV do far, which gives bad glxgears performance. I wonder what im missing? |
When that happened to me, I had to manually build/install the modules for my kernel using the instructions in the nvidia-glx README... _________________ Dentists are evil. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
riprjak Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 26 Apr 2003 Posts: 116 Location: Adelaide, Au
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Guru wrote: | Shiryou wrote: | Yeah, i do have a little problem along these lines. I cant seem to get Xorg to run with the nvidia drivers. IT complains that it cant find the nvidia module, even though lsmod reprts that its actually loaded. I can only use the NV do far, which gives bad glxgears performance. I wonder what im missing? |
I have the same problem as described in this thread:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=142490
Basically, my nvidia drivers get loaded correctly at boot (as shown via lsmod); however, when X.org tries to start, it complains it cannot load the nvidia drivers.
I am working with a CLEAN gentoo install using kernel 2.6.5 (gentoo-dev-sources). Anyone else having this problem? |
EXACTLY the same problem. ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64" or "amd64" nvidia-glx/kernel drivers, 2.6.5-r1 gentoo-dev-sources
Dmesg shows no errors on the load of the nvidia module (taints kernel, of course... but no errors)... tried every nvagp option in xorg.conf...
A solution would be appreciated _________________ ---
$> cd /pub
$> more beer > /home/riprjak/.mouth |
|
Back to top |
|
|
riprjak Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 26 Apr 2003 Posts: 116 Location: Adelaide, Au
|
Posted: Wed May 05, 2004 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
riprjak wrote: | A solution would be appreciated |
Ask and I shall recieve this thread details solution.
err!
jak _________________ ---
$> cd /pub
$> more beer > /home/riprjak/.mouth |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nutterpc Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 02 Feb 2004 Posts: 83
|
Posted: Wed May 05, 2004 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
What this sounds like to me is you need to is try the following:
Make sure your nvidia driver is set to load in /etc/modules.autoload.d/kernel-2.6
If they are, proceed to next step
As per my original post, when you originally setup gentoo, there was a part where you had to look for all modules (one of them's the nvidia driver). Once you find that it is there, try deleting this file.
try then re-emerging the nvidia-drivers, then reboot.......cross your fingers too, that might help
Nutterpc _________________ If it isn't broke, you ain't tweaked it right
Registered Linux User 353232 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carney1979 Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 145 Location: Maine
|
Posted: Sat May 22, 2004 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Still didn't work for me
Negeus' solution is worth a try, but it will have to wait until the AM. Caffiene has run out and I'm done.
Funny thing was I HAD glx working perfectly under xfree until someone suggested I try reemerging xfree with a couple of different use flags. That's when I got into trouble. I removed the new use flags and tried again to remerge xfree. Now glx was "broken".
I'll bet that sometime between my last update of xfree and when I tried to reemerge xfree I must have changed or added or deleted a use flag(s) that it all needs to work. And now the problem has carried over when I installed xorg.
Nutterpc, care to share your use flags used to emerge xorg?
David |
|
Back to top |
|
|
moocha Watchman
Joined: 21 Oct 2003 Posts: 5722
|
Posted: Sat May 22, 2004 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, what are the USE flags you emerged X.Org with? cat /var/db/pkg/x11-base/xorg-x11-6.7.0/USE _________________ Military Commissions Act of 2006: http://tinyurl.com/jrcto
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- attributed to Benjamin Franklin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sdaffis Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 16 Nov 2003 Posts: 100 Location: Umeå, Sweden
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Now I too have switched to X.org with no hassle at all!
All I did was:
Code: | emerge -C xfree
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge xorg
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge nvidia-kernel nvidia-glx corefonts
|
And basically I was set! I just backed up my old XF86Config-4 before and copied + edited it for fonts. Rocks like ninja!
(You've just gotta LOVE the faster startup time!!!) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|cJ| n00b
Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 37 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LeTene wrote: | You can avoid having to do the nasty inject of XFree86 by using:
Code: |
emerge --nodeps nvidia-glx
|
One caveat - I'm not too sure how this will affect emerge -u world or emerge -U world of your system, but on mine it seems OK. |
I was having problems until i read this thanx alot! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pcrissman n00b
Joined: 04 Oct 2003 Posts: 35 Location: MPLS, MN, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm working on a fresh install, and decided to go with xorg right from go.
It just finished compiling, and etc-update has informed me that I have 257 files that need updating.
257 files!
Keep in mind, this is a fresh install. The only things I've done past the end of the install guide is install the bootsplash/framebuffer.
Is this many files to update normal? I was just curious. I almost fell off my chair. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|