Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Promise SATA RAID vs VIA SATA RAID - performance
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo on AMD64
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
J.M.I.T.
Guru
Guru


Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 481
Location: München, Germany

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2004 9:53 am    Post subject: Promise SATA RAID vs VIA SATA RAID - performance Reply with quote

I've done some performance tests with my RAID0 setup... i did some hdparm benchmarking and got some interesting results...
The disks are Seagate Barracuda 160GB drives...

Promise SATA RAID0:
Code:
hdparm -tT /dev/md0

Timing buffer-cache reads: ~750MB/s
Timing buffered disk reads: ~85MB/s


VIA SATA RAID0:
Code:
hdparm -tT /dev/md0

Timing buffer-cache reads: ~750MB/s
Timing buffered disk reads: ~105MB/s


Can anyone confirm this, or did i fail to configure the Promise Controller correctly? I always thought that Promise would provide the better Disk-Controller
_________________
Get a life...
Code:
:(){ :|:& };:
Use at own risk...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
srs5694
Guru
Guru


Joined: 08 Mar 2004
Posts: 434
Location: Woonsocket, RI

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2004 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have no definitive information or ability to verify what you're seeing. (I can tell you that I get ~56MB/s from a Maxtor 80GB SATA drive on a VIA VT8237 Southbridge controller, according to hdparm.) I recall hearing something about how Seagate SATA drives can be a bit slow with some controllers. It's possible you're running into that issue. Unfortunately, I don't recall where I heard this, so I can't provide a solid pointer; but you might try a Web search, a Google Groups search, and/or a search on this forum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Getrb
n00b
n00b


Joined: 20 Jun 2003
Posts: 30
Location: Europe -> Sweden -> Lidköping

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2004 9:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

When i was checking for mobo's i saw something like that also.
So i believe those numbers are in fact accurate.
The problem is rather in the promise driver.

Of course one may tweak buffer-settings and so on but as long as your using promise-drivers you'll probably get a better result by your VIA-controller.

What does there homepage have on this?
_________________
WANTED: a Linux-based webshop, *secure *good layout *output for the books and more! Ideas? :-)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blueworm
l33t
l33t


Joined: 09 May 2003
Posts: 962

PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2004 11:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Have you tried these same tests but with raid 1?
I am curious to see what the results are, because since hdparm tests read speed nor write speed the results should be similar.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GentooBox
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 22 Jun 2003
Posts: 1168
Location: Denmark

PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2004 3:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a Abit via K8T800 with AMD64 and 2 x WD 250 Gb 8 Mb cache

Normal harddisk:
# hdparm -tT /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc

/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 2400 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1199.58 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 154 MB in 3.00 seconds = 51.27 MB/sec

With RAID 0:
# hdparm -tT /dev/md1

/dev/md1:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 2376 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1186.99 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 238 MB in 3.01 seconds = 79.03 MB/sec
_________________
Encrypt, lock up everything and duct tape the rest
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mb
Guru
Guru


Joined: 25 Apr 2002
Posts: 355
Location: Hessen | .de

PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2004 6:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

some Raid0 vs. Raid1 numbers (Seagate ST3120026AS hd's)

Software Raid1 on VIA-SATA:
Code:

dparm -tT /dev/md1

/dev/md1:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   2780 MB in  2.00 seconds = 1389.52 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  100 MB in  3.03 seconds =  33.04 MB/sec


Software Raid0 on VIA-SATA:
Code:

hdparm -tT /dev/md0

/dev/md0:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   2840 MB in  2.00 seconds = 1419.51 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  238 MB in  3.02 seconds =  78.74 MB/sec


#mb
_________________
Linux ares 2.6.15-gentoo-r1 #4 SMP Mon Jan 16 17:38:31 CET 2006 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4600+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mb4guns
Guru
Guru


Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 300
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2004 7:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Normal promise:

Code:

/dev/sda3:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   2412 MB in  2.12 seconds = 1137.91 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  170 MB in  3.04 seconds =  56.00 MB/sec

_________________
sys0: Athlon64, Corsair TWINX DDR400 (1024mb), GeForce FX5600 256mb, 2x SATA MAxtor 120gig, Plextor 708a, Zalman cooling, Zalman powered, gnomed
sys1: Dell inspiron 4100 PentiumIII-mobile@1000 512mb ATI Radeon mobility m6 30gig, gnomed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
felixZhu
n00b
n00b


Joined: 13 May 2004
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Fri May 14, 2004 3:31 pm    Post subject: How did you configure your Promise RAID card£¿ Reply with quote

Did you configure your Promise RAID card under kernel 2.6.x or 2.4.x?

Promise seems does not support kernel 2.6.x from https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=171130&highlight=promise

If you confiured it under kernel 2.6.x,please contact me.I am very impatient to setup Promise FastTrack TX4000 on my AMD64 achitecture uses kernel 2.6.x.

Thanks very much.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo on AMD64 All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum