View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sir_skiner Apprentice
Joined: 03 Mar 2004 Posts: 282 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sat May 15, 2004 12:01 pm Post subject: love-* vs ck-* comparison |
|
|
first i do not intend to start a flame war, but
which sources are better [stability and performance counts together] "love" or "ck" _________________ sir_skiner
GentooLinux - thinking best |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Halcy0n Developer
Joined: 17 Sep 2003 Posts: 1682 Location: Freehold, NJ
|
Posted: Sat May 15, 2004 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I personally like ck-sources better. I tried love, but things like bootsplash could be broken from release to release, and I really don't need to be that bleeding edge. Its all a matter of taste though. Try them out and see which one you like better I didn't notice too much of a performance difference between the two kernels in my daily use. _________________ Mark Loeser
http://www.halcy0n.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pink Veteran
Joined: 24 Jul 2003 Posts: 1062
|
Posted: Sat May 15, 2004 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The only real way to answer that is to try them yourself.
Not meant to be rude, but I have found many different kernels to be good at different things in different configurations.
Only way to know is to try |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cerement Guru
Joined: 14 Jun 2003 Posts: 404
|
Posted: Sat May 15, 2004 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stability: depends, but --
ck- is patched off of the mainline stable kernel
love- is patched off of the most recent mm- development kernel
Speed/Responsiveness: harder to tell, users will argue for either one --
if you need definitive numbers, take a look at testing with Contest by Con Kolivas ... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gentoo Server Apprentice
Joined: 21 Jul 2003 Posts: 279
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2004 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am using ck kernel 2.6.4 und now uptime 60+ days
til now works like a charm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|