| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
maxulanhot
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Nov 2003
Posts: 89
Location: Northeast China
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 4:54 am Post subject: Can't mount reiser4 filesystem |
 |
|
I have just patched the kernel to enable reiser4, then I made filesystem by mkfs.reiser4 command on a spare patition, but I can't mount it , the error shown below:
| Code: |
root root # cat /etc/filesystems | grep reiser
reiserfs
reiser4
root root # mkfs.reiser4 /dev/hdb8
mkfs.reiser4 0.5.5
Copyright (C) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 by Hans Reiser, licensing governed by
reiser4progs/COPYING.
Block size 4096 will be used.
Linux 2.6.6-love5 is detected.
Uuid 0337aad6-2af7-45a5-9c97-6f7d599d2f8e will be used.
Reiser4 is going to be created on /dev/hdb8.
(Yes/No): Yes
Creating reiser4 on /dev/hdb8...done
root root # mount -t reiser4 /dev/hdb8 /mnt/gentoo
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdb8,
or too many mounted file systems
|
Anybody can help me?
_________________
-- The Most Gentooer -- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jake
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Posts: 1132
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Possibly try a more recent auto-snapshot, and with a more vanilla kernel than love. Actually, you may have just made a mistake patching, but newer sources would be better anyway since all the bugs are supposedly fixed.
Redeeman2 or, if you don't mind patching manually, 2.6.7-rc3-mm1-JM2 both linked at https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=189452&start=25 should work. I've been using the -JM patches for a few days on all but 10Mb of my 200Gb drive, and I haven't had trouble. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
maxulanhot
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Nov 2003
Posts: 89
Location: Northeast China
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 5:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you for your reply, I'm going to try the latest mm-sources. 
_________________
-- The Most Gentooer -- |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jake
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Posts: 1132
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| You'd be better off using 2.6.7-mm2, that's what the latest auto-snapshot is diffed against. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
maxulanhot
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Nov 2003
Posts: 89
Location: Northeast China
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 5:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Then, what should I do now? Should I re-patch the 2.6.7-mm2 by the latest auto-snapshot again?
_________________
-- The Most Gentooer -- |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jake
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Posts: 1132
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 5:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| maxulanhot wrote: | | Then, what should I do now? Should I re-patch the 2.6.7-mm2 by the latest auto-snapshot again? |
I'm not sure what you're asking. If you want to use -mm and patch it manually, emerge 2.6.7-mm2 (latest is -mm3, not sure if it's in portage yet) and apply the auto-snapshot. That's all. If you try to do it twice, patch will ask you if you meant to use the -R option to remove the patch, so don't do that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
maxulanhot
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Nov 2003
Posts: 89
Location: Northeast China
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah it is worked !
Thanks a lots !
_________________
-- The Most Gentooer -- |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Kernel & Hardware
