OpenOffice.org 2.x

hlevyn · Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 12:14 am Post subject:

Hello. Forgive me for being out of the loop on this one but how are we compiling Firefox with SSL these days? Last I remember the patch located at http://geki.ath.cx/hacks/mozilla-firefox-ebuild.patch had it. But after applying that and building I get the following:

fantasma13 · n00b Joined: 15 Jul 2004 Posts: 28 Location: Europe

Elenyon · n00b Joined: 11 Feb 2005 Posts: 44 Location: Philadelphia

How does one go about applying the STLport Patch as my build of OOo keeps erroring out with a STLport error ?
_________________
Visit the Lug DUGLUG

neves7 · n00b Joined: 11 Dec 2004 Posts: 8

hi there,

When i typing in the word processor or in the presentation can't write any character like this: á à í ì é è etc...

What could be the problem??

sneakerski · Apprentice Joined: 14 Oct 2003 Posts: 168

on a sort-of related note, sun's StarOffice 8 java installer sucks fist-sized balls

more importantly just had to comment this ebuild has come along quite nicely since i last tried it, great work
_________________
Athlon 64 X2 @ 2ghz on an Asus nForce 4 w/ 1gig
Radeon X850 using OSS Radeon drivers

taskara · Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 5:40 am Post subject:

Edit: 'Cause I'm using firefox 1.0.7 now, which doesn't have ssl flag support.
Went back to 1.0.6 and it doesn't complain about ssl firefox anymore, it just dies elsewhere instead!

Cheers,
-c

Greetings,

How does one build firefox with ssl again?
I do not want mozilla, but need to have something, so have to have firefox, but to have firefox need ssl..

I did compile 1.9.24 just fine, but now can't remember!

Cheers,
-c
_________________
Kororaa install method - have Gentoo up and running quickly and easily, fully automated with an installer!

zatalian · Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 4:38 pm Post subject:

I see there is an official openoffice-2.0.0_rc2 ebuild in portage.
does this mean that this thread will end? Or can we expect some future ebuilds.
I really liked the idea of compiling openoffice with gcj and the official ebuild does not support that.

geki · Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:27 pm Post subject:

well, i will build my ebuilds on milestones as stable or unstable they are.
as long as ooo-build will offer tarballs.
in portage or suka's overlay you see stable versions and useflags.
which i do not mind for.
as a result you got more useflags and newer versions.

but at the moment i got some important private problems to solve first.

right now i am drunk so no idea if my writing does any sense.

have fun!
_________________
hear hear

hlevyn · Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:36 pm Post subject:

Xake · Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:38 pm Post subject:

geki · Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:53 pm Post subject:

ok, fixed some things until now.
you may follow first post.
thanks...
_________________
hear hear

hlevyn · Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:05 pm Post subject:

Do you know which OO build is used in the latest ebuild in portage by any chance?

Thanks!

_________________
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.

geki · Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:23 pm Post subject:

http://go-oo.org/packages/OOO680/
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/app-office/openoffice/openoffice-2.0.0.ebuild?rev=1.2&content-type=text/plain
_________________
hear hear

hlevyn · Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:43 pm Post subject:

Ah. Thanks. =)
_________________
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.

geki · Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 11:35 am Post subject:

completed compilation.
updated overlay online.
_________________
hear hear

scoobydu · Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:12 pm Post subject:

Not sure what I'm doing wrong here but your nspr and nss installed fine, but openoffice doesn't seem to see them?

geki · Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:58 pm Post subject:

old. refetch ^^
btw, its still broken on installset creation.
edit should be fixed now.
- refetch
- re-copy nss/nspr pkg-config files or fix version strings manually :lol:

_________________
hear hear

geki · Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:04 am Post subject:

anyone built OOo2.1.133 w/o java and hits this bug?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110131
_________________
hear hear

geki · Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 9:36 pm Post subject:

m136 will be buildable with sun-jdk-1.5.x.
at least seems to...

and may be with jdk-1.3.1 again. i listened there were issues. lets see...

edit non-java builds seem to be broken anyway.

module - desc
officecfg - no non-java alternative scripts for build
filter - python script is broken
...who knows whats more

http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56619
------- Additional comments from as Wed Oct 26 05:40:59 -0700 2005 -------
_________________
hear hear

hlevyn · Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 9:38 pm Post subject:

geki · Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 3:32 pm Post subject:

restructured ebuild and patch handling to conform more upstream ooo-build
_________________
hear hear

scoobydu · Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 5:29 pm Post subject:

geki · Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 6:13 pm Post subject:

that is to drop own hacks and to do it the upstream way - like it should be
milestone independent
_________________
hear hear

scoobydu · Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:18 pm Post subject: