View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mr sk Apprentice
Joined: 15 Jul 2004 Posts: 174 Location: Hollis
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:25 am Post subject: Where is the emerge telnet? I want telnet! |
|
|
Where is telnet>
thanks! _________________ "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a *revolutionary act" - George Orwell.
www.intrusionsec.com [root wars (free)] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tazok Guru
Joined: 25 Oct 2003 Posts: 310
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
netkit-telnetd
includes client and server. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
snekiepete Guru
Joined: 07 May 2003 Posts: 306 Location: WISCONSIN
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I use
# emerge telnet-bsd
or you could try to see others
# emerge -s telnet (to search for other versions) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mr sk Apprentice
Joined: 15 Jul 2004 Posts: 174 Location: Hollis
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks.!
I was wondering what that telnet-bsd was. cool, I just want the client.
Thanks y'all. I know SSH is better, but sometimes I need telnet. _________________ "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a *revolutionary act" - George Orwell.
www.intrusionsec.com [root wars (free)] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
odessit Apprentice
Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 180 Location: Current Residency - Server Room - Caution - Frostbite Imminent!
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
why telnet? it sends unencrypted everything including passwords.
would ssh be a better option?
though a home LAN would net be a problem |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gnuageux Veteran
Joined: 17 Apr 2004 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 6:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | why telnet? it sends unencrypted everything including passwords.
would ssh be a better option?
though a home LAN would net be a problem |
There are situations where telnet is more appropriate than SSH. For example, say you setup a local MTA and you want to make sure that your answering on port 25. telnet localhost smtp would work whereas ssh wouldnt.[/url] _________________ The realOTW: http://forums.realotw.org/index.php
Registered Linux user#364538 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Souperman Guru
Joined: 14 Jul 2003 Posts: 449 Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
odessit wrote: | why telnet? it sends unencrypted everything including passwords.
would ssh be a better option? |
SSH would be better *if* you're using it to login to a remote account. Not much use for doing something like 'telnet host 25' to test SMTP, etc. Personally, I use netcat for that sort of thing though. _________________ moo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gnuageux Veteran
Joined: 17 Apr 2004 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 6:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I havent played around w/ netcat. I'll check into it though. _________________ The realOTW: http://forums.realotw.org/index.php
Registered Linux user#364538 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lyallp Veteran
Joined: 15 Jul 2004 Posts: 1599 Location: Adelaide/Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2004 3:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I use telnet to connect to my Router... (a Netgear RP114) It has a web interface but the telnet interface is more powerful.
The router only supports these two access methods.
Hence, thats why I want telnet... (yep, I was searching for it too)
Strange, I did an 'emerge search telnet' and did not find the telnet-bsd package... (maybe I had brain failure at the time...) _________________ ...Lyall |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|