Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
new reiser4 part won't mount
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Gentree
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 01 Jul 2003
Posts: 5350
Location: France, Old Europe

PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:16 pm    Post subject: new reiser4 part won't mount Reply with quote

Hi,

Before I, start I have 2.6.6-love4 kernel since for months and this seems to be one of the most reliable kernels to run reiser4 . I have been useing r4 for portage for four months without a hitch.

Now...

I make a new partition with parted (it is not r4 awasre so I let it default to ext2) , I quit, reboot and mkfd.reiser4 on the new partition. OK.

But when I mount it , it fails , so I did the following fsck which reports OK but still I get some bad crap when I try to mount it.

Can anyone see what I have missed?

The, gentree.

Code:
Continue?                                                                                                                                                             
(Yes/No): yes
***** fsck.reiser4 started at Fri Jul 23 01:08:11 2004
Reiser4 journal (journal40) on /dev/hdc13: 0 transactions replayed of the total 0 blocks.                                                                             
Reiser4 fs was detected on /dev/hdc13.                                                                                                                               
Master super block (16):
magic:          ReIsEr4
blksize:        4096
format:         0x0 (format40)
uuid:           ff8dafd3-6857-469c-b3a1-f41bf3a13fdc
label:          <none>
 
Format super block (17):
plugin:         format40
description:    Disk-format for reiser4, ver. 0.5.6
magic:          ReIsEr40FoRmAt
flushes:        0
mkfs id:        0xd831fd5
blocks:         1331379
free blocks:    1331298
root block:     22
tail policy:    0x2 (smart)
next oid:       0x10000
file count:     0
tree height:    2
key policy:     LARGE
 
 
CHECKING STORAGE TREE                                                                                                                                                 
        Read nodes 2                                                                                                                                                 
        Nodes left in the tree 2
                Leaves of them 1, Twigs of them 1
        Time interval: Fri Jul 23 01:08:11 2004 - Fri Jul 23 01:08:11 2004
CHECKING EXTENT REGIONS.                                                                                                                                             
        Read twigs 1                                                                                                                                                 
        Time interval: Fri Jul 23 01:08:11 2004 - Fri Jul 23 01:08:11 2004
CHECKING SEMANTIC TREE                                                                                                                                               
        Found 1 objects.                                                                                                                                             
        Time interval: Fri Jul 23 01:08:11 2004 - Fri Jul 23 01:08:11 2004
***** fsck.reiser4 finished at Fri Jul 23 01:08:11 2004
Closing fs...done

FS is consistent.

bash-2.05b# mount !$
mount /dev/hdc13
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc13,
       or too many mounted file systems


8)

PS if I format it to reiserfs under parted it mounts without pb , but if I then reformat it as r4 I'm back to the bad-block symdrome .
:?
_________________
Linux, because I'd rather own a free OS than steal one that's not worth paying for.
Gentoo because I'm a masochist
AthlonXP-M on A7N8X. Portage ~x86
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bombs14
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 03 Sep 2003
Posts: 140

PostPosted: Fri Jul 23, 2004 3:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

try:

Code:
mount -t reiser4 /dev/hdc13
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gentree
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 01 Jul 2003
Posts: 5350
Location: France, Old Europe

PostPosted: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for pointing out that obvious mistake!

I can no longer check because I gave up and formatted as r3 so I could use it but I am pretty sure I would not have repeatedly made the same mistake : I had deleted and remade the partition several times to try to clear the pb.

I had the same pb last week when I was reformatting the paritition and mount it as xfs ,jfs ,r3 and r4 to do some comparison tests. Only r4 was giving me this trouble so I cant imagine I use -t in all cases execpt when it was r4.


Thanks for the suggestion . I'll have to wait until I get the same thing again because the partition is in use now.

Thx 8)
_________________
Linux, because I'd rather own a free OS than steal one that's not worth paying for.
Gentoo because I'm a masochist
AthlonXP-M on A7N8X. Portage ~x86
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oumpah-pah
Guru
Guru


Joined: 18 Jul 2004
Posts: 575
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland

PostPosted: Fri Jul 23, 2004 10:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The correct syntax would be :
    1. without fstab entry
    Code:
    mount -t reiser4 /dev/hdc13 /mnt/test

    2. with fstab entry
    Code:
    mount /mnt/test

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gentree
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 01 Jul 2003
Posts: 5350
Location: France, Old Europe

PostPosted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK , I wasnt dreaming::

here's a reply I got to my bug report

Quote:


------- Additional Comments From stefan-schweizer@gmx.de 2004-07-24 01:16 PST -------
If you use the latest reiser4progs you cannot mount the partition with the old snapshot in your kernel, take
a newer snapshot. Either from one of the later loves or from http://www.namesys.com/auto-snapshots/.


8)
_________________
Linux, because I'd rather own a free OS than steal one that's not worth paying for.
Gentoo because I'm a masochist
AthlonXP-M on A7N8X. Portage ~x86
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bombs14
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 03 Sep 2003
Posts: 140

PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 8:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The correct syntax would be :

1. without fstab entry
Code:
mount -t reiser4 /dev/hdc13 /mnt/test

2. with fstab entry
Code:
mount /mnt/test



ahhh, yes! what was I thinking...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum