| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
manuels
Advocate
Joined: 22 Nov 2003
Posts: 2146
Location: Europe
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 1:04 pm Post subject: Nforce-net & kernel 2.6.8 [solved] |
 |
|
Moin,
ich will auf kernel 2.6.8 umsteigen - soweit ohne probleme, aber das emergen von Nforce-net klappt nicht.
den 1. Fehler (das auffinden von modpost) konnte ich schnell beheben, aber jetzt krieg ich folgendes:
| Code: | >>> md5 src_uri ;-) NVIDIA_nforce-1.0-0261.tar.gz
>>> Checking NVIDIA_nforce-1.0-0261.tar.gz's mtime...
>>> WORKDIR is up-to-date, keeping...
* /usr/src/linux is a symbolic link
* Determining the real directory of the Linux kernel source code
* Building for Linux 2.6.8-gentoo found in /usr/src/linux
* /usr/src/linux is a symbolic link
* Determining the real directory of the Linux kernel source code
* Building for Linux 2.6.8-gentoo found in /usr/src/linux
* Applying 2.5/6 patch ...
* Failed Patch: nforce-net-1.0.0261-kernel-2.6.patch.gz!
*
* Include in your bugreport the contents of:
*
* /var/tmp/portage/nforce-net-1.0.0261-r2/temp/nforce-net-1.0.0261-kernel-2.6.patch.gz-3825.out
!!! ERROR: net-misc/nforce-net-1.0.0261-r2 failed.
!!! Function epatch, Line 331, Exitcode 0
!!! Failed Patch: nforce-net-1.0.0261-kernel-2.6.patch.gz!
|
Hat jemand ne idee??
Tschö
Manuel
[edit] achja, das steht in der oben genannten datei:
| Code: | ***** nforce-net-1.0.0261-kernel-2.6.patch.gz *****
===================================================
PIPE_COMMAND: gzip -dc /usr/portage/net-misc/nforce-net/files/nforce-net-1.0.02 61-kernel-2.6.patch.gz > /var/tmp/portage/nforce-net-1.0.0261-r2/temp/3825.patch
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p0 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/nforce-net-1.0.0261-r2/temp/382 5.patch
===================================================
can't find file to patch at input line 4
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Naur nvnet/Makefile nvnet-2.5/Makefile
|--- nvnet/Makefile 2003-05-06 16:39:38.000000000 -0300
|+++ nvnet-2.5/Makefile 2003-07-10 23:51:29.000000000 -0300
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
4 out of 4 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 53
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Naur nvnet/nvnet.c nvnet-2.5/nvnet.c
|--- nvnet/nvnet.c 2003-05-06 16:39:38.000000000 -0300
|+++ nvnet-2.5/nvnet.c 2003-07-15 20:26:52.000000000 -0300
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
6 out of 6 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 110
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Naur nvnet/nvnet.h nvnet-2.5/nvnet.h
|--- nvnet/nvnet.h 2003-05-06 16:39:38.000000000 -0300
|+++ nvnet-2.5/nvnet.h 2003-06-14 12:36:47.000000000 -0300
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
===================================================
PIPE_COMMAND: gzip -dc /usr/portage/net-misc/nforce-net/files/nforce-net-1.0.02 61-kernel-2.6.patch.gz > /var/tmp/portage/nforce-net-1.0.0261-r2/temp/3825.patch
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p1 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/nforce-net-1.0.0261-r2/temp/382 5.patch
===================================================
patching file Makefile
Hunk #1 FAILED at 21.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 76.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 104.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 147.
4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej
patching file nvnet.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 29 with fuzz 2 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 759.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 771.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 784 with fuzz 2 (offset 5 lines).
Hunk #5 FAILED at 1137.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 1256.
4 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file nvnet.c.rej
patching file nvnet.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 104.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file nvnet.h.rej
===================================================
PIPE_COMMAND: gzip -dc /usr/portage/net-misc/nforce-net/files/nforce-net-1.0.02 61-kernel-2.6.patch.gz > /var/tmp/portage/nforce-net-1.0.0261-r2/temp/3825.patch
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p2 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/nforce-net-1.0.0261-r2/temp/382 5.patch
===================================================
missing header for unified diff at line 4 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 4
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Naur nvnet/Makefile nvnet-2.5/Makefile
|--- nvnet/Makefile 2003-05-06 16:39:38.000000000 -0300
|+++ nvnet-2.5/Makefile 2003-07-10 23:51:29.000000000 -0300
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
4 out of 4 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 53 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 53
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Naur nvnet/nvnet.c nvnet-2.5/nvnet.c
|--- nvnet/nvnet.c 2003-05-06 16:39:38.000000000 -0300
|+++ nvnet-2.5/nvnet.c 2003-07-15 20:26:52.000000000 -0300
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
6 out of 6 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 110 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 110
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Naur nvnet/nvnet.h nvnet-2.5/nvnet.h
|--- nvnet/nvnet.h 2003-05-06 16:39:38.000000000 -0300
|+++ nvnet-2.5/nvnet.h 2003-06-14 12:36:47.000000000 -0300
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
===================================================
PIPE_COMMAND: gzip -dc /usr/portage/net-misc/nforce-net/files/nforce-net-1.0.02 61-kernel-2.6.patch.gz > /var/tmp/portage/nforce-net-1.0.0261-r2/temp/3825.patch
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p3 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/nforce-net-1.0.0261-r2/temp/382 5.patch
===================================================
missing header for unified diff at line 4 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 4
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Naur nvnet/Makefile nvnet-2.5/Makefile
|--- nvnet/Makefile 2003-05-06 16:39:38.000000000 -0300
|+++ nvnet-2.5/Makefile 2003-07-10 23:51:29.000000000 -0300
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
4 out of 4 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 53 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 53
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Naur nvnet/nvnet.c nvnet-2.5/nvnet.c
|--- nvnet/nvnet.c 2003-05-06 16:39:38.000000000 -0300
|+++ nvnet-2.5/nvnet.c 2003-07-15 20:26:52.000000000 -0300
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
6 out of 6 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 110 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 110
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Naur nvnet/nvnet.h nvnet-2.5/nvnet.h
|--- nvnet/nvnet.h 2003-05-06 16:39:38.000000000 -0300
|+++ nvnet-2.5/nvnet.h 2003-06-14 12:36:47.000000000 -0300
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
===================================================
PIPE_COMMAND: gzip -dc /usr/portage/net-misc/nforce-net/files/nforce-net-1.0.02 61-kernel-2.6.patch.gz > /var/tmp/portage/nforce-net-1.0.0261-r2/temp/3825.patch
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p4 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/nforce-net-1.0.0261-r2/temp/382 5.patch
===================================================
missing header for unified diff at line 4 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 4
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Naur nvnet/Makefile nvnet-2.5/Makefile
|--- nvnet/Makefile 2003-05-06 16:39:38.000000000 -0300
|+++ nvnet-2.5/Makefile 2003-07-10 23:51:29.000000000 -0300
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
4 out of 4 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 53 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 53
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Naur nvnet/nvnet.c nvnet-2.5/nvnet.c
|--- nvnet/nvnet.c 2003-05-06 16:39:38.000000000 -0300
|+++ nvnet-2.5/nvnet.c 2003-07-15 20:26:52.000000000 -0300
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
6 out of 6 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 110 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 110
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Naur nvnet/nvnet.h nvnet-2.5/nvnet.h
|--- nvnet/nvnet.h 2003-05-06 16:39:38.000000000 -0300
|+++ nvnet-2.5/nvnet.h 2003-06-14 12:36:47.000000000 -0300
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
|
[/edit]
Last edited by manuels on Tue Aug 17, 2004 4:00 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
golloza
Guru
Joined: 14 Mar 2004
Posts: 427
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ich weiss ja nicht, welches Patchset die Gentoo Sources benutzen, aber offenbar sind die mit dem Nvidia Treiber inkompatibel.
Du kannst den forced-eth Treiber aus dem Kernel nehmen oder mal testen, ob es mit Vanilla Sources geht. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheX
Guru
Joined: 31 Jul 2004
Posts: 349
Location: .de
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ich benutze den 2.6.7 kernel und alles läuft,
nforce-net wollte bei mir auch nicht emergen, Grund : device not found
Im Kernel hab ich nur das FORCEDETH module einkompiliert.
viel erfolg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
manuels
Advocate
Joined: 22 Nov 2003
Posts: 2146
Location: Europe
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ahh, die option hab ich übersehn, danke |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Realmaker
l33t
Joined: 17 Sep 2003
Posts: 683
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Worin besteht der Vorteil, wenn man die Binär-Treiber von NVidia nimmt und nicht das ForceDeth-Modul?
_________________
Athlon 2600+ Barton, Asus A7N8x-X, nForce2, Asus Geforce FX5700 256mb, TwinMos 512ddr-sdram cl 2.5
Wer andern eine Bratwurst brät, der hat ein Bratwurstbratgerät. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheX
Guru
Joined: 31 Jul 2004
Posts: 349
Location: .de
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Keine Ahnung, aber bei den frischeren Kernels emerged nforce-net net 
da ists doch einfacher direkt das ForceDeth-Modul zu nehmen, oder? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Realmaker
l33t
Joined: 17 Sep 2003
Posts: 683
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Eigentlich ja, deswegen wollte ich wissen, wo der Unterschied ist.
_________________
Athlon 2600+ Barton, Asus A7N8x-X, nForce2, Asus Geforce FX5700 256mb, TwinMos 512ddr-sdram cl 2.5
Wer andern eine Bratwurst brät, der hat ein Bratwurstbratgerät. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Deutsches Forum (German)
