Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
reiser4 final - horror stories
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
neuron
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 28 May 2002
Posts: 2371

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 4:29 pm    Post subject: reiser4 final - horror stories Reply with quote

anyone seen any yet? I kinda figured I'd see a few "it's fast but dont do XXX" fairly quickly, not that I'm paying attention, but does anyone have any horror stories on reiser4 final yet?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
miseiler
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 17 Mar 2003
Posts: 118

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 5:20 pm    Post subject: Re: reiser4 final - horror stories Reply with quote

neuron wrote:
anyone seen any yet? I kinda figured I'd see a few "it's fast but dont do XXX" fairly quickly, not that I'm paying attention, but does anyone have any horror stories on reiser4 final yet?

Working great here.
_________________
Cthulhu for president.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bigun
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 2198

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

New filesystem?
_________________
"It's ok, they might have guns but we have flowers." - Perpetual Victim
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nate_S
Guru
Guru


Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 414

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 5:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Suprisingly, as I've been casually following the reiser4 news, I have yet to see any reports of lost data. I have heard a few reports of crashes under load, or it not performing like it should, etc., but no lost data. (feel free to correct me if this is not the case)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
miseiler
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 17 Mar 2003
Posts: 118

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nate_S wrote:
Suprisingly, as I've been casually following the reiser4 news, I have yet to see any reports of lost data. I have heard a few reports of crashes under load, or it not performing like it should, etc., but no lost data. (feel free to correct me if this is not the case)


Shouldn't be that surprising :wink:

The whole idea behind atomicity rather than metadata journalling is to eliminate any conditions where data loss is even possible.
_________________
Cthulhu for president.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mmealman
Guru
Guru


Joined: 02 Nov 2002
Posts: 348
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

miseiler wrote:

Shouldn't be that surprising :wink:

The whole idea behind atomicity rather than metadata journalling is to eliminate any conditions where data loss is even possible.


Considering it's a .0 release of a brand new filesystem, yeah it's suprising. It usually takes a solid year before a new filesystem is stable enough that people aren't seeing their hard drives randomly getting wiped.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asimon
l33t
l33t


Joined: 27 Jun 2002
Posts: 979
Location: Germany, Old Europe

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had a frozen rsync yesterday while rsyncing ~16 GB from one reiser4 partition to an other reiser4 partition. I was in single user mode and couldn't stop the process, hard disc activity was zero when I came back to the console and noticed the hanging rsync. After a rebooting no fs had errors but there where no files copied to the destination. I can't tell if it was reiser4's fault or rsync or the kernel or my bad karma.

Besides that I have reiser4 running on some non-critical data partitions where it is used for some heavy-duty compiling, no problems so far. But still I wait at least for two or three further bug-fix releases before I even play with the tought of using it for important data too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
neuron
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 28 May 2002
Posts: 2371

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

asimon wrote:
Besides that I have reiser4 running on some non-critical data partitions where it is used for some heavy-duty compiling, no problems so far. But still I wait at least for two or three further bug-fix releases before I even play with the tought of using it for important data too.


yeah, I totally agree, I'm playing with the idea of putting it on my laptop, just surprised I haven't seen more eeek it ate my data messages ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
syadnom
Guru
Guru


Joined: 09 May 2002
Posts: 531

PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 11:34 am    Post subject: yeah Reply with quote

running reiser4 on my laptop. have been running pre-releases for sometime and moved up to file as soon as the patch for gentoo-dev-sources was out in the forums here.

i run gentoo-dev-sources-r3 right now with the reiser4 patch available right here in the forums and have had absolutely no problems.

did have a performance issue as i used the tar method to move my data off the drive and back on, the fix was to boot the reiser4 gentoo boot disk and copy the files from old directory to a new one so that reiser4 could reorder and repack the data for speed, then no problems.

works great, even when battery dies in middle of work, atomic filesystems rock!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gandalf the White
Guru
Guru


Joined: 17 Dec 2003
Posts: 320
Location: Verdun, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 2:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, yesterday I rebuilt my system from scratch, on a new reiser4 partition. Unfortunately Reedeman hasn't finished his newest and I couldn't wait, so I built it using 0.5.5 snapshot from June 23 I think. Anyway.... I was in love at first tar -xvjpf stage1........... Wow, this works great, my system is running faster and better than it ever has before. On reiser3 xmms used to choke if I had more than 3 things compiling at the same time, Yesterday I had 5 things compiling, listening to xmms, on top of plain xorg, and not a single choke. Anyone have any ideas how I could upgrade the reiser4 to the latest without reedeman's livecd?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
will_in_wi
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 04 Feb 2004
Posts: 117

PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 2:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I switched the entire system over to reiser4 when it was released. Not a hiccup yet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Robin79
l33t
l33t


Joined: 18 Oct 2003
Posts: 632
Location: /home/valdemarsvik

PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 3:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Damm i just want to convert my old reiserfs3 to reiserfs4 but i cant i must format the disks :(
_________________
Gentoo 2005.0
ASUS P5AD2 Deluxe MB
Intel P4 3.2GHz
PCI-E Nvidia Geforce PCX 5750
--------------------

Registered Linux User Nr # 319050 http://counter.li.org
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Realmaker
l33t
l33t


Joined: 17 Sep 2003
Posts: 683
Location: Bremen, Germany

PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 3:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm just copying files to an old disk :)
_________________
Athlon 2600+ Barton, Asus A7N8x-X, nForce2, Asus Geforce FX5700 256mb, TwinMos 512ddr-sdram cl 2.5

Wer andern eine Bratwurst brät, der hat ein Bratwurstbratgerät.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wdreinhart
Guru
Guru


Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 569
Location: 4QFJ12345678

PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's been working alright for me for the last 2 months now. There are a few "gotcha!" situations you need to watch for. First, you can't resize reiser4 filesystems yet. (Mr Reiser is hoping someone will pay him to implement this in the future) Second, current (post-1.0) versions of fsck.reiser4 don't recognize filesystems created with mkfs.reiser4 < 1.0. You'll have to use debugfs.reiser4 -C to update those filesystems to the new backup block format before you can fsck them again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
miseiler
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 17 Mar 2003
Posts: 118

PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wdreinhart wrote:
It's been working alright for me for the last 2 months now. There are a few "gotcha!" situations you need to watch for. First, you can't resize reiser4 filesystems yet. (Mr Reiser is hoping someone will pay him to implement this in the future) Second, current (post-1.0) versions of fsck.reiser4 don't recognize filesystems created with mkfs.reiser4 < 1.0. You'll have to use debugfs.reiser4 -C to update those filesystems to the new backup block format before you can fsck them again.


Question: Mine's created with 1.00 and I've had absolutely no problems with it so far. To run the newer fsck.reiser4 will I need to update? You mention versions less than 1.00 and after 1.00...I'm pretty sure you meant 1.00+, but I just want to clarify. :)
_________________
Cthulhu for president.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
syadnom
Guru
Guru


Joined: 09 May 2002
Posts: 531

PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 7:34 pm    Post subject: fyi Reply with quote

fyi,
for anyone with enough space OR an extra drive, DONT tar up your system. just use cp. this was reiser4 will realign and repack day and you can avoid the performance hit many people are experiencing with converted systems.

i just
mk /usr.new
cp -p /usr /usr.new

mv /usr /usr.old
mv /usr.new /usr

if you have any trouble,boot from a reiser4 enabled cd to do this.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
-Sarbian-
n00b
n00b


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

miseiler wrote:
wdreinhart wrote:
It's been working alright for me for the last 2 months now. There are a few "gotcha!" situations you need to watch for. First, you can't resize reiser4 filesystems yet. (Mr Reiser is hoping someone will pay him to implement this in the future) Second, current (post-1.0) versions of fsck.reiser4 don't recognize filesystems created with mkfs.reiser4 < 1.0. You'll have to use debugfs.reiser4 -C to update those filesystems to the new backup block format before you can fsck them again.


Question: Mine's created with 1.00 and I've had absolutely no problems with it so far. To run the newer fsck.reiser4 will I need to update? You mention versions less than 1.00 and after 1.00...I'm pretty sure you meant 1.00+, but I just want to clarify. :)


Before the release the version number was 0.5X. If you created your fs with version 1.0X you don t need to upgrade.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Realmaker
l33t
l33t


Joined: 17 Sep 2003
Posts: 683
Location: Bremen, Germany

PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 1:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is it possible to create a partition with an older version, install gentoo on it and convert it later to 1.0?
I don't want to wait for a new Redeeman live-cd :D
_________________
Athlon 2600+ Barton, Asus A7N8x-X, nForce2, Asus Geforce FX5700 256mb, TwinMos 512ddr-sdram cl 2.5

Wer andern eine Bratwurst brät, der hat ein Bratwurstbratgerät.


Last edited by Realmaker on Mon Aug 30, 2004 2:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RexM
n00b
n00b


Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 47
Location: South Jordan, Utah

PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 2:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If somebody came out with a tool that would allow you to convert a reiserfs partition to a reiserfs4 partition... I might actually praise them and shower them with flowers and gifts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
syadnom
Guru
Guru


Joined: 09 May 2002
Posts: 531

PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 6:51 pm    Post subject: well Reply with quote

i filesystem conversion program would be iffy.

first, reiser4 partitions can't be resized(yet).
if they could, and the source filesystem could as well, then you could simply have a script resize the source filesystem to the smallest possible size, create a reiser4 partition and move files over, they resize the original again as the free space would now be available to shrink it more and the cycle continues.

OR

the partitions information could be stored into ram(or in a recovery files on the boot partition.)

a program could systematically cache data to ram starting and sector 0, erase the sector and start building a new reiser4 filesystem behind it. i think this would be dangeerous though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CRV§ADER//KY
Guru
Guru


Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 405
Location: Torino

PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

8O wooooooo....... 8O I'm looking at the benchmarks right now....
http://www.namesys.com/benchmarks.html

ZERO performance loss when reading/writing on 8 simultaneous streams.....


I love it. :oops:

I'm definitely going to do it at least on my root partition within the next 3 months (while I'll wait at least 6 months to use it on my 100Gb-worth data partition.... :roll: )
_________________
Kyrie, Ignis Divine, Eleison ~ Elfen Lied
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yinyang
n00b
n00b


Joined: 29 Jul 2003
Posts: 65
Location: Berlin/Germany

PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is surely worth of giving it a try, but I wouldn't believe a benchmark from the creator ;)

Does anyone have any independent benchmarks?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gentree
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 01 Jul 2003
Posts: 5350
Location: France, Old Europe

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have been using R4 since the begining of the year. Never had any problems.

I use it for portage (including portage_tmpdir where the compiling gets done) since it seems that R4 is strongest on large numbers of small files.

For a small number of large files (audio , video , cd images etc) xfs is probably a better choise.

Just do a search if you want some benchmarks.

HTH

@neuron
You may like to change the title of this thread, it unfairly gives the impression that there are substantial problems with R4. That is far from from what you are actually saying but it looks bad in the forum index.
8)
_________________
Linux, because I'd rather own a free OS than steal one that's not worth paying for.
Gentoo because I'm a masochist
AthlonXP-M on A7N8X. Portage ~x86
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
senzacionale
Guru
Guru


Joined: 29 Jun 2004
Posts: 532
Location: Slovenia

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i would like to know if reiser4 will be 100% compatitable with NTFS! Can we write on it without loosing any data!
_________________
Spletno narocanje hrane in dostava hrane na dom na portalu DostavaHrane.si
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gentree
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 01 Jul 2003
Posts: 5350
Location: France, Old Europe

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apparently there are issues with R4 and NFS (network file system) not to be confused with NTFS.

If you directly mount a windows NTFS partition under Linux it is the kernel that handles the file IO for that device and it should have no bearing on what other file systems you may or may not be using on other partitions.

HTH 8)
_________________
Linux, because I'd rather own a free OS than steal one that's not worth paying for.
Gentoo because I'm a masochist
AthlonXP-M on A7N8X. Portage ~x86
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum