| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
seppe
Guru
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 431
Location: Hove, Antwerp, Belgium
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:59 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| raku wrote: | does this kernel support write-barriers?
with
| Code: |
#/dev/hda6 /home reiser4 noatime,barrier=flush 0 0
|
my /home won't mount |
Yes it does, it seems like write barriers are already in 2.6.9-rc1. When I tried to add the patch, it said that its already in.
_________________
nitro-sources, because between stable and experimental there exists only speed
Latest release I made: 2.6.13.2-nitro1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raku
Bodhisattva
Joined: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 2374
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
so, why I got this then?
| Code: |
reiser4[mount(5016)]: parse_options (fs/reiser4/vfs_ops.c:844)[nikita-2307]:
WARNING: Unrecognized option: "barrier=flush"
|
you've already seen my fstab, I use reiser4progs 1.0.1, what else should I show you from my config?
_________________
raku
Powered by Archlinux  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaMouse
Apprentice
Joined: 18 Jul 2003
Posts: 233
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cagnulein wrote: | | DaMouse wrote: | any specific pi program? if its super_pi i'd say thats not reallly a fair benchmark as its probably not in the 2.6 headers
-DaMouse |
super_pi for linux si pi (read the super_pi file )
why is so fair? |
Its binary iirc?
-DaMouse
_________________
I am the dark lord DaMouse I eat souls and wear the dressing gown of evil. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cagnulein
l33t
Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 861
Location: Modena, Italy
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yeppa, but it's the same binary for all my version kernel tested  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaMouse
Apprentice
Joined: 18 Jul 2003
Posts: 233
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cagnulein wrote: | | yeppa, but it's the same binary for all my version kernel tested |
Surely something compiled against the 2.6 headers that came with the kernel would be a better guideline?
-DaMouse
_________________
I am the dark lord DaMouse I eat souls and wear the dressing gown of evil. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nikore
n00b
Joined: 23 May 2004
Posts: 14
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pleusicles wrote: | | Nikore wrote: | | I just decided to try this kernel out and i'm haveing a simular probelm to nuzzy. When my computer boots it goes to get the ip address for eth0 (dhcp) and the computer just locks up there. I am useing an Intel PRO/1000 CT (built in too my mobo), it works fine under windows and my back up kernel (2.6.9 rc1 MM2). Any ideas why its not working under this kernel verstion? |
I've also had such problems: the booting process stopped while starting lo (or in other case, pci-hotplug). By setting RC_PARALLEL_STARTUP to "no" in /etc/conf.d/rc, however, I was finally able to boot the machine. Of course, it may have been pure luck... |
Well I tryied that and it didnt work but now with the new GCC upgrade (i run with ~x86 all the time) I cant even compile this kernel it fails to build my network card driver
| Code: |
make[1]: `arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CC drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.o
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c: In function `e1000_up':
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c:132: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'e1000_irq_enable': function body not available
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c:277: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
make[3]: *** [drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [drivers/net/e1000] Error 2
make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
|
I would love any idaes on how to fix it (or at lest why its doing this)
thanks,
Nikore |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaMouse
Apprentice
Joined: 18 Jul 2003
Posts: 233
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| raku wrote: | so, why I got this then?
| Code: |
reiser4[mount(5016)]: parse_options (fs/reiser4/vfs_ops.c:844)[nikita-2307]:
WARNING: Unrecognized option: "barrier=flush"
|
you've already seen my fstab, I use reiser4progs 1.0.1, what else should I show you from my config? |
Perhaps because reiser4 doesn't support OR need barriers?
ONLY reiserfs 3.6 and ext3 have barrier support ONLY! rarg
-DaMouse
_________________
I am the dark lord DaMouse I eat souls and wear the dressing gown of evil. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Meqif
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Posts: 103
Location: Portugal
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is anyone else having problems burning cds? K3b has this in the debugging output:
| Code: | System
-----------------------
K3b Version:0.11.14
KDE Version: 3.3.0
QT Version: 3.3.3
cdrecord
-----------------------
Cdrecord-Clone 2.01a28 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg Schilling
TOC Type: 0 = CD-DA
Using libscg version 'schily-0.8'.
Driveropts: 'burnfree'
scsidev: '/dev/hdc'
devname: '/dev/hdc'
scsibus: -2 target: -2 lun: -2
Warning: Open by 'devname' is unintentional and not supported.
Linux sg driver version: 3.5.27
SCSI buffer size: 64512
/usr/bin/cdrecord: Cannot allocate memory. Cannot get SCSI I/O buffer.
... |
EDIT: And yes, I can burn cds as root... Looks like the cddvd patch isn't having any effect... Probably anything else related to cd burning was changed... :/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TierMann
n00b
Joined: 11 Jul 2004
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Reiser4 is allready atomic.
Reiser3 and ext3 you can use barriers to make it atomic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Zordas
n00b
Joined: 10 Jun 2003
Posts: 19
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 9:08 pm Post subject: AMD64 workks well |
|
|
| Just a quick note: This is the first release of ANY nitro source that I have been able to get to cleanly compile and make work on a AMD64 platform. AND IT ROCKS !! cfq -- nvidia 6111 drivers --- ACPI -- the works. Excellect kernel. Keep up the great work ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raku
Bodhisattva
Joined: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 2374
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TierMann & DaMouse: thanks for explanation.
_________________
raku
Powered by Archlinux |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zbyte64
n00b
Joined: 09 Apr 2003
Posts: 42
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 9:17 am Post subject: orinoco |
|
|
only thing missing is the orinoco patches, i rlly hope they include it in the next release.
btw, awesome job. I am considering moving from love-sources....
_________________
Im not creative enough to come up with a witty signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tomm1111
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 94
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| This is a stupid question...When I run this ebuild I get a cannot find linux-2.6.9.tar.bz2 error on the ebuild digest command. Any idea's. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tomm1111
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 94
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| This is a stupid question...When I run this ebuild I get a cannot find linux-2.6.9.tar.bz2 error on the ebuild digest command. Any idea's. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MrApples
Guru
Joined: 13 Dec 2002
Posts: 511
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
i believe that would mean that you failed to download it
_________________
http://www.whatsinyourbox.org -- Technology discussion, news, and more. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tomm1111
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 94
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 3:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Tell me where "linux-2.6.9.tar.bz2" is and I will be golden. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sobers_2002
Veteran
Joined: 16 Mar 2004
Posts: 1128
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 4:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
there is no such thing as linux-2.6.9.tar.bz2.......hence it can't find it.......are u sure u didn't modify the ebuild???........just throwing it in portage overlay(or portage if u don't wanna keep it forever) and then | Code: | | emerge nitro-sources -av --digest |
is enough........nywayz check ur ebuild again.......thats the problem.
_________________
Pdict - dockable dictionary client for linux
FREE97WIN: Use this code on Dreamhost and you get $97 off !! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mile_slo
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 91
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
@Meqif
same error here with K3B  , did you find any solution? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jewps
n00b
Joined: 29 Mar 2004
Posts: 74
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think it's a known problem with k3b, i recall seeing that problem asked in #love-sources as I don't use it myself. Try out bashburn in the mean time, it's quite nice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
seppe
Guru
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 431
Location: Hove, Antwerp, Belgium
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Weird, k3b works perfectly here with this nitro.
_________________
nitro-sources, because between stable and experimental there exists only speed
Latest release I made: 2.6.13.2-nitro1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mile_slo
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 91
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
same error with bashburn.. i think cdecord has problem with this kernel version
@seppe
which cdrecord version do you use?
Last edited by mile_slo on Tue Sep 14, 2004 12:36 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
seppe
Guru
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 431
Location: Hove, Antwerp, Belgium
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
seppe@Helios ~/Imaget $ cdrecord -version
Cdrecord-Clone 2.01a37 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg Schilling
cdrecord: Warning: Running on Linux-2.6.9-rc1-nitro4
cdrecord: There are unsettled issues with Linux-2.5 and newer.
cdrecord: If you have unexpected problems, please try Linux-2.4 or Solaris.
It works for me, as a matter of fact .. I'm burning a cd right now
_________________
nitro-sources, because between stable and experimental there exists only speed
Latest release I made: 2.6.13.2-nitro1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lamekain
Guru
Joined: 25 Nov 2003
Posts: 331
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi everyone. moving from love to nitro and trying to get this working on my laptop..
I patched the kernel with swsusp2 (it went ok) and then tried make. This is what i got:
| Code: | arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c: In function `balanced_irq':
arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c:567: error: `PF_SYNCTHREAD' undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c:567: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c:567: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[1]: *** [arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/i386/kernel] Error 2
|
Any ideas? the same thing happened with the previous nitro.. Can swsusp2 be used at all with nitro?
_________________
"Only when the last tree has died, the last river been poisoned,
and the last fish been caught, will we realize we cannot eat money"
-Global Terrorism.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gentree
Watchman
Joined: 01 Jul 2003
Posts: 5350
Location: France, Old Europe
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| seppe wrote: | | Weird, k3b works perfectly here with this nitro. |
and k3b uses cdrecord by default.
I have only done DVD+RW with k3b but that was fine on nitro.
_________________
Linux, because I'd rather own a free OS than steal one that's not worth paying for.
Gentoo because I'm a masochist
AthlonXP-M on A7N8X. Portage ~x86 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gentree
Watchman
Joined: 01 Jul 2003
Posts: 5350
Location: France, Old Europe
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| tomm1111 wrote: | | This is a stupid question...When I run this ebuild I get a cannot find linux-2.6.9.tar.bz2 error on the ebuild digest command. Any idea's. |
The output is misleading , if it fails the md5 it says so but then two lines later says the file does not exist.
See the first error line which gives the full path then cut and paste it to rm !
Portage will then reget the file and all should make sense.
Sometimes I even get this if I interupt the download. Othertimes it takes up where I stopped it.
HTH
_________________
Linux, because I'd rather own a free OS than steal one that's not worth paying for.
Gentoo because I'm a masochist
AthlonXP-M on A7N8X. Portage ~x86 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
