View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
axa n00b
![n00b n00b](/images/ranks/rank_rect_0.gif)
![](images/avatars/18311571503f84b8189edef.gif)
Joined: 17 Jun 2003 Posts: 51 Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 2:39 am Post subject: whats different between 2.4 module .o and 2.6 module .ko ? |
|
|
As subject... i dont know what diffferent between .o and .ko
Anyone can explain for it?? _________________ Trust & Unique... |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
F.Ultra Apprentice
![Apprentice Apprentice](/images/ranks/rank_rect_2.gif)
Joined: 17 Mar 2004 Posts: 169 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 8:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Google gave a link to an IBM page that said: Quote: | Kernel modules now have .ko extension to differentiate from regular object files with .o extension | . |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
nightblade Guru
![Guru Guru](/images/ranks/rank_rect_3.gif)
![](images/avatars/10423315640fcee34691a3.jpg)
Joined: 20 Jul 2004 Posts: 368 Location: back from SE Asia
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Correct.
It's just a naming convention used by the 2.6 series to differentiate kernel objects. _________________ In God we trust. All the others must provide a valid X.509 certificate |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
|