Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Firefox 0.10, Thunderbird 0.8 released
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours
View posts from last 7 days

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Desktop Environments
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Meqif
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Posts: 103
Location: Portugal

PostPosted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 7:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For people who's having problems with Thunderbird:

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63999#c12

Quote:
the missing mail problem is easily solved by doing

<code>rm .thunderbird/default/foo.bar/compreg.dat</code>

at least for me and <a href="https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=223512&highlight=&sid=2026c3b43d6e6dbcafccbba7e0b42fe8"> several other people on the forums</a>. as some others said, maybe the ebuild should do this?


It worked for me. :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ahmadster
n00b
n00b


Joined: 11 Aug 2003
Posts: 39
Location: Issaquah, WA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:51 pm    Post subject: Bad Find Reply with quote

Find as you type is broken. The find toolbar look ok ,, I like it, but IT IS BROKEN. It wont find.
I think this is something with the chrome script. And this is a Linux virsion only problem. The Mac version works just fine.
Here is a screenshot of the error.

http://www.bitbuilder.com/ff1_js.png

Everytime it tries to scroll the word that function fails (get_fastFind )

Please someone if you have a solution do tell. Can't use find is berry baad!
_________________
- - -- ---- ----------------------------------------- --- -- - -
Ahmad Baitalmal
http://ahmad.baitalmal.com
-------------------------------------------------------------- --- -- -
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jup
n00b
n00b


Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 10:36 pm    Post subject: Re: Bad Find Reply with quote

ahmadster wrote:
Find as you type is broken. The find toolbar look ok ,, I like it, but IT IS BROKEN. It wont find.
I think this is something with the chrome script. And this is a Linux virsion only problem. The Mac version works just fine.
Here is a screenshot of the error.

http://www.bitbuilder.com/ff1_js.png


Yep, right. I get exactly same errors. This is sad.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dioxmat
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 04 May 2002
Posts: 709
Location: /home/mat

PostPosted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 10:52 pm    Post subject: Re: delete entire lines? Reply with quote

scottfk wrote:
Here's a quirk in the new Firefox... you can't use the old-standby CTL-U to delete an entire line.

This was great for clearing the address bar... you'd just put the insertion point anywhere in the URL and hit CTL-U to delete the whole thing. You didn't have to select the whole thing, thus replacing whatever you had in your X clipboard.

Now whenever I hit CTL-U Firefox displays the source of the page.

You still can. This is handled by gtk2, you just need to tell gtk2 that you want Emacs bindings.

There is a gconf pref for this if you are using gnome (finding it it left as an exercice to the reader), and if you are not, just adding gtk-key-theme-name = "Emacs" to your .gtkrc-2.0 should work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
allucid
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 02 Nov 2002
Posts: 1314
Location: atlanta

PostPosted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 10:55 pm    Post subject: Re: Bad Find Reply with quote

jup wrote:
ahmadster wrote:
Find as you type is broken. The find toolbar look ok ,, I like it, but IT IS BROKEN. It wont find.
I think this is something with the chrome script. And this is a Linux virsion only problem. The Mac version works just fine.
Here is a screenshot of the error.

http://www.bitbuilder.com/ff1_js.png


Yep, right. I get exactly same errors. This is sad.

damint. this is a very important feature to me. i'm downgrading. :(
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chunderbunny
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 1281
Location: 51°24'27" N, 0°57'15" W

PostPosted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For some reason I can't use my cursor keys to move a cursor around, when typing in text boxes anymore. Using the cursor keys moves the window around instead.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Slyde
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 314

PostPosted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hah, I just realized it says .10 not 1.0. The orginal poster should fix his topic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chunderbunny
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 1281
Location: 51°24'27" N, 0°57'15" W

PostPosted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Slyde wrote:
Hah, I just realized it says .10 not 1.0. The orginal poster should fix his topic.


Nope, the original post is right. The newest version is 0.10, it's using the same nomenclature as kernel minor versions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
genb0y
n00b
n00b


Joined: 10 Apr 2004
Posts: 20

PostPosted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 12:19 am    Post subject: Re: Bad Find Reply with quote

allucid wrote:
jup wrote:
ahmadster wrote:
Find as you type is broken. The find toolbar look ok ,, I like it, but IT IS BROKEN. It wont find.
I think this is something with the chrome script. And this is a Linux virsion only problem. The Mac version works just fine.
Here is a screenshot of the error.

http://www.bitbuilder.com/ff1_js.png


Yep, right. I get exactly same errors. This is sad.

damint. this is a very important feature to me. i'm downgrading. :(


https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64196
Now my firefox find toolbar works well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Slyde
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 314

PostPosted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 1:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

chunderbunny wrote:
Slyde wrote:
Hah, I just realized it says .10 not 1.0. The orginal poster should fix his topic.


Nope, the original post is right. The newest version is 0.10, it's using the same nomenclature as kernel minor versions.

I may not be understanding your correctly but .10 < .9*.

http://www.mozilla.org/press/mozilla-2004-09-14-02.html

Quote:
These releases bring Firefox and Thunderbird one step closer to their much anticipated 1.0 releases, scheduled for later this fall.
:?:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gil-galad55
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 101

PostPosted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

chunderbunny wrote:
Slyde wrote:
Hah, I just realized it says .10 not 1.0. The orginal poster should fix his topic.


Nope, the original post is right. The newest version is 0.10, it's using the same nomenclature as kernel minor versions.


Help -> About gives me "version 1.0 Preview Release", so that settles it for me at least.
_________________
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
"To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield." Tennyson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Insanity5902
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Posts: 1228
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

PostPosted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah in the about screen it show 1.0 Pre Release but look in the fine print it is called Firefox 0.10.

I will post a screen shot tomorrow.

Truly, both names are correct.
_________________
Join the adopt an unanswered post initiative today
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hardcore
l33t
l33t


Joined: 01 Nov 2003
Posts: 626
Location: MSU, MI

PostPosted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah but in the about box:

Code:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040916 Firefox/0.10


And as for the numbering, .10 is less than .09 indeed mathematically, but Mozilla seems to be following kernel.org's minor numbering system.

For example 2.4.10 is greater than 2.4.09. Don't think about the period as a decimal point, as most of the world uses other symbols for that, such as the comma. Think about it as Firefox zero, 10.
_________________
Nothing can stop me now, cuz I just don't care.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gil-galad55
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 101

PostPosted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I understand quite clearly the concept of major and minor releases. Thus, Firefox 0.9.3 (the previous version) is major release zero, minor release 9, maintenance release 3. They have used this convention at least since 0.4, when it was called Phoenix, which is when I began using it. If they are calling it 0.1 PR internally, then they have changed their convention. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but it seriously makes no sense to go from 0.9 to 0.1. I think it's a typo.

(In your previous example, you say 2.4.10 > 2.6.09 -- this is quite true, but you'll notice there is still a numerical increase. Not so with 0.9 -> 0.1!)

That having been said, this has to be the most pointless issue ever :)
_________________
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
"To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield." Tennyson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nsahoo
l33t
l33t


Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Posts: 618

PostPosted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the new firefox search sucks big time :evil:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
piquadrat
Guru
Guru


Joined: 18 Feb 2003
Posts: 301
Location: Switzerland

PostPosted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gil-galad55 wrote:
I understand quite clearly the concept of major and minor releases. Thus, Firefox 0.9.3 (the previous version) is major release zero, minor release 9, maintenance release 3. [...] Not that there's anything wrong with that, but it seriously makes no sense to go from 0.9 to 0.1. I think it's a typo.


Major release zero, minor release ten? Whats so hard about it?

Quote:
(In your previous example, you say 2.4.10 > 2.6.09 -- this is quite true, but you'll notice there is still a numerical increase. Not so with 0.9 -> 0.1!)

Please type 'uname -r' in a console. You'll get something like '2.6.8' (considering you're on 2.6), not '2.6.08'! And in a few weeks, you'll get '2.6.10'. Version numbers aren't real numbers...

Quote:
That having been said, this has to be the most pointless issue ever :)


Agreed :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
discostu
Guru
Guru


Joined: 01 Nov 2002
Posts: 333

PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 12:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The find would be really cool if it worked :) It will highlight words, but go to next, previous doesn't. Also in any text box, the arrow keys and home and end don't work! This is really, really annoying!

If there's any resolution to either of these problems, please let me know.

thanks,
Stu

p.s. I'm not sure if installing new extensions works either. Extensions that I had already installed still work. But new ones don't seem to
_________________
"Disco Stu doesn't advertise."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hardcore
l33t
l33t


Joined: 01 Nov 2003
Posts: 626
Location: MSU, MI

PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 1:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

discostu wrote:
The find would be really cool if it worked :) It will highlight words, but go to next, previous doesn't. Also in any text box, the arrow keys and home and end don't work! This is really, really annoying!

If there's any resolution to either of these problems, please let me know.

thanks,
Stu

p.s. I'm not sure if installing new extensions works either. Extensions that I had already installed still work. But new ones don't seem to


This is a known problem, in your ~/.mozilla/firefox/default** directory, remove compreg.dat
_________________
Nothing can stop me now, cuz I just don't care.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Desktop Environments All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum