| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
piquadrat
Guru
Joined: 18 Feb 2003
Posts: 301
Location: Switzerland
|
 Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 9:41 am Post subject: Firefox 0.10, Thunderbird 0.8 released |
 |
|
Firefox: Source, Installer
Thunderbird: Source, Tarball
Have fun! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frippz
Guru
Joined: 22 Aug 2002
Posts: 460
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I sure will! 
Now I just have to find the changelog. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Xk2c
Apprentice
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 240
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Boris27
Guru
Joined: 05 Nov 2003
Posts: 562
Location: Almelo, The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm. The windows (school atm) installer doesn't download.
Other nice thing; The server footer shows this:
Not Found
The requested URL /pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/0.10/Firefox Setup 1.0PR.exe was not found on this server.
Apache/2.0.49 (Gentoo/Linux) Server at ftp.mozilla.org Port 80
The mozilla people use gentoo 
_________________
we are microsoft, lower your firewalls and surrender your pc's. we will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. your culture will adapt and service us. resistance is futile. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aslocum
Apprentice
Joined: 28 May 2004
Posts: 217
Location: Germany, Frankfurt
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
beware.. many extensions dont work with firefox 0.10!
_________________
Dell Latitude d610 1.6Ghz 1GB
gcc-4.0.3 2.6.15-no3
Reiser4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bgzee
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 11 Aug 2003
Posts: 116
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| how long until the ebuilds will be available? On a somewhat related note, isnt gnome 2.8 scheduled for release tommorrow? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ck42
l33t
Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Posts: 789
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
...just waiting for the ebuilds  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ruach
n00b
Joined: 28 May 2004
Posts: 67
Location: Utah
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
johnnyICON
Apprentice
Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 296
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ruach wrote: | | The title should be firefox 1.0PR (prerelease), not firefox 0.10. Maybe a mod can edit that. |
haha yea, seems to be a mathematical error.
... v0.8, v0.9, v0.10??? == 0.1 Welcome to elementary school... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ThomasA
n00b
Joined: 17 Feb 2003
Posts: 9
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| johnnyICON wrote: | | ruach wrote: | | The title should be firefox 1.0PR (prerelease), not firefox 0.10. Maybe a mod can edit that. |
haha yea, seems to be a mathematical error.
... v0.8, v0.9, v0.10??? == 0.1 Welcome to elementary school... |
Not really. It's not a decimal point until you've been told otherwise
In this case it's a major/minor version separator. Just like 127.0.0.1 is shorthand for a 32 bit integer. Ie. firebird-0.10 is major release 0, minor release 10. Just like linux-2.4.27
Btw, you do know that not all countries use 'dot' as a decimal point, right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
piquadrat
Guru
Joined: 18 Feb 2003
Posts: 301
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ruach wrote: | | The title should be firefox 1.0PR (prerelease), not firefox 0.10. Maybe a mod can edit that. |
Well, it depends. My USER_AGENT says "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040914 Firefox/0.10" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xRay_
n00b
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 18
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ive been waiting for firefox 1 tenth, firefox 9 tenths was good though. Im running it on my gentoo 2004 and 2 tenths system ATM  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jefklak
l33t
Joined: 26 Oct 2003
Posts: 818
Location: Belgium
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Does the all-in-one gesture extension still work?
_________________
{Linux User #333296}
Kernel 2.6.9-nitro4! << hurrah |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Syzar
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 28 Apr 2003
Posts: 76
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| There's a bug in Bugzilla, with attached ebuild for Firefox. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phranzee
Guru
Joined: 22 Nov 2003
Posts: 397
Location: katowice/pl
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jefklak wrote: | | Does the all-in-one gesture extension still work? |
edit: just reinstall it
_________________
signature fault
post dumped ;]
Last edited by phranzee on Tue Sep 14, 2004 7:38 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stuart_Gilbert
n00b
Joined: 08 Sep 2003
Posts: 66
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What's with everyone saying 0.10 is wrong?
What else would you have after zero point nine if not zero point ten? Presuming it's not the actual release, which this isn't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jefklak
l33t
Joined: 26 Oct 2003
Posts: 818
Location: Belgium
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mdowney
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 16 Sep 2003
Posts: 120
Location: Columbus, OH
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Not installing this until Shimoda can get tabbrowser Extensions working in this version of firefox. I downloaded the windows version at work and I can't stand the default tab handling. Also the render engine seems to have slowed down since .9.3 not sure whats causing this... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
placeholder
Advocate
Joined: 07 Feb 2004
Posts: 2500
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Scientifically, 0.1 != 0.10 because 0.10 has two sig figs so you cannot equate it in that sense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
user
Apprentice
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 211
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is extensive important to know if we talk about version 0.10.0 or 1.0!
Where is the milestone for numbering 1.0?
Is here a mozdev guy? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
neenee
Veteran
Joined: 20 Jul 2003
Posts: 1786
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hm.. my usernames + passwords were not transferred from 0.93 to 0.10  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
placeholder
Advocate
Joined: 07 Feb 2004
Posts: 2500
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| neenee wrote: | | hm.. my usernames + passwords were not transferred from 0.93 to 0.10 |
Heck, I don't even have autocomplete on because I see it all as an annoyance and security issue. Of course, I'm sure that doesn't help you solve your problem very much. It's probably not hard to put all the stuff back in, correct? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
neenee
Veteran
Joined: 20 Jul 2003
Posts: 1786
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
quite hard, since some passwords can only be found in mails on cds somewhere 
i would not be whining if it was solved in a few minutes
and regardless of it being no work or a lot of work; is it too much
to ask for updates not messing up config files? since that's what
they are to me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The_Fang
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 25 Dec 2003
Posts: 75
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thunderbird 0.8 ebuild, where are you?
I like this new RSS-feature in this release... I wanna try it, but i am too lazy to make my own ebuild
BTW: Is it true that gnome 2.8 is going to be released today?
_________________
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TommyB
n00b
Joined: 07 Feb 2004
Posts: 30
Location: Nuremberg, Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There's a Thunderbird ebuild you might want to try in this bug, although there have been reported some problems with it.
Better save your mails first
[edit] There's now an ebuild in portage. [/edit] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Desktop Environments
