View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
rogerj n00b
![n00b n00b](/images/ranks/rank_rect_0.gif)
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 1:16 am Post subject: Difference between share permissions and ntfs permissions |
|
|
I am having a problem with permissions. What is the diff between share and ntfs?
Thanks
http://www.kittyhawkfreepress.com/index.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
SZwarts l33t
![l33t l33t](/images/ranks/rank_rect_4.gif)
![](images/avatars/151516939242ee87380f0a7.jpg)
Joined: 13 Oct 2003 Posts: 629 Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
While you're compare two completely different things. ntfs is a filesysytem. A share is way of giving information to other people.
So if you choose for example samba for sharing on a ntfs partition, you have (at least) two levels of permissions.
When you're trying to access such a share, first samba is going to look if according to his information the client is allowed to access the data. If that check succeeds it tries to read/write/access the data. By doing that it does some operations on the filesystem, so the ntfs module looks if samba is allowed to access that data. If both things are succesful the data is delivered. _________________ only when it is dark enough, can you see the stars |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
nobspangle Veteran
![Veteran Veteran](/images/ranks/rank_rect_5_vet.gif)
![](images/avatars/210249061640b0c1d626f5b.gif)
Joined: 23 Mar 2004 Posts: 1318 Location: Manchester, UK
|
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
With windows boxes the ntfs permissions are plenty. The best method is to set the share permissions to everyone full access, and then set ntfs permissions on the files and folders. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
|