| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
marder7
n00b
Joined: 15 Nov 2002
Posts: 56
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2002 4:41 pm Post subject: CUPS, wwwoffle: network daemons needed? |
 |
|
Hi!
The cupsd script in /etc/init.d says that CUPS needs "net".
So I looked after a network related script providing "net", but I haven't found any.
So what does cupsd actually need?
(x)inetd?
nscd?
hpptd?
anything else?
I am runnig gentoo 1.4rc1 as a standalone desktop system with isdn dialup to my ISP (no local network). Therefore, I was happy with my ipppd so far...
But the http://localhost:631 in my browser (CUPS config interface) doesn't work. It says "connection refused" or "no such service"...
BTW: What about wwwoffled? Does it need any of the daemons mentioned?
Thanks for helping
Martin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lapu
n00b
Joined: 28 Aug 2002
Posts: 15
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2002 5:22 pm Post subject: Re: CUPS, wwwoffle: network daemons needed? |
|
|
[quote="marder7"]Hi!
The cupsd script in /etc/init.d says that CUPS needs "net".
So I looked after a network related script providing "net", but I haven't found any
I had really problems with CUPS.
/etc/init.d/cupsd start
didn't work until I deleted
#rc-update del net.eth0 default.
You could try
#/usr/sbin/cupsd |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marder7
n00b
Joined: 15 Nov 2002
Posts: 56
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2002 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well, thanks, but "rc-update del net.eth0 default" isn't an option for me, since I don't have any *.eth? in my runlevels...
I have a "net.ipppd" only, which I have puzzled togehter from the "net.pppd" example (including the bug therein  )
regards,
M. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Larde
Guru
Joined: 07 Jun 2002
Posts: 313
Location: Duesseldorf, Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2002 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi!
| Quote: | The cupsd script in /etc/init.d says that CUPS needs "net".
So I looked after a network related script providing "net", but I haven't found any. |
I am pretty sure the the "net" dependency is a meta dependency for "net.*". So if you start any "net.*", that would provide net. Actually, you should have this with net.lo.
This is pretty stupid, at least for sshd, which also has the "net" dependency. Configuring our new router with eth0-eth7, I restart one eth interface and blam, sshd stops. Crazy.
Btw, I just tried it again. I stopped "net.lo" and every service depending on "net" stopped, so theoretically, starting net.lo should be sufficent for cupsd et al.
Hth,
Larde.
edit: Hey, it's not called meta dependency, it's called virtual service. Still, it sucks, it's a bug not a feature, IMHO.
_________________
Someday this will be my home... http://moonage.net/
I'll make you a deal
I'll say I came from Earth and my tongue is taped
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Networking & Security
