View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
G|N| Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 26 Feb 2004 Posts: 138 Location: Turnhout (Belgium)
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 8:51 am Post subject: best 2.6 kernel |
|
|
i heard a lot of bad things about the 2.8.1 kernel so my question to you is what do you think is the best 2.6.* kernel?
and would it be better to download the gentoo-development-sources then the development-sources?
if i want the 2.6.7 development-sources, how do i download them?
i think the standard development-sources is 2.6.8.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miqorz Veteran
Joined: 04 Apr 2004 Posts: 1170 Location: Pissing into the wind.
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Uh, 2.6.9 is out.
Right now I'm using 2.6.8.1-ck9 and I find it very good. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
G|N| Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 26 Feb 2004 Posts: 138 Location: Turnhout (Belgium)
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
miqorz wrote: | Uh, 2.6.9 is out.
Right now I'm using 2.6.8.1-ck9 and I find it very good. |
but it is still marked as testing |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anarcho Advocate
Joined: 06 Jun 2004 Posts: 2970 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm running fine with gentoo-dev-sources 2.6.8-r10.
They have the vesafb-tng and a few other nice patches like the burning patch. _________________ ...it's only Rock'n'Roll, but I like it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miqorz Veteran
Joined: 04 Apr 2004 Posts: 1170 Location: Pissing into the wind.
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
G|N| wrote: | miqorz wrote: | Uh, 2.6.9 is out.
Right now I'm using 2.6.8.1-ck9 and I find it very good. |
but it is still marked as testing |
I wouldn't know. I use CK sources which are allways ~x86. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Muso Veteran
Joined: 22 Oct 2002 Posts: 1052 Location: The Holy city of Honolulu
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
2.6.9 so far ...
been using it for 2 days now. _________________ "You can lead a horticulture but you can't make her think" ~ Dorothy Parker
2021 is the year of the Linux Desktop! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
G|N| Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 26 Feb 2004 Posts: 138 Location: Turnhout (Belgium)
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
and how do i emerge for example the 2.6.9 kernel? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pink Veteran
Joined: 24 Jul 2003 Posts: 1062
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | emerge -a development-sources |
Ensure you have synced recently as the 2.6.9 kernel was only added in the past day or so.
Last edited by Pink on Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:35 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miqorz Veteran
Joined: 04 Apr 2004 Posts: 1170 Location: Pissing into the wind.
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
PickledOnion wrote: | Code: | emerge -a development-sources |
|
I'm one of the few who doesn't like gentoo sources I guess. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Muso Veteran
Joined: 22 Oct 2002 Posts: 1052 Location: The Holy city of Honolulu
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Or make your own ebuild with the patches you like and stick it in your portage overlay so you don't have to sync to get the newer kernels _________________ "You can lead a horticulture but you can't make her think" ~ Dorothy Parker
2021 is the year of the Linux Desktop! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pink Veteran
Joined: 24 Jul 2003 Posts: 1062
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
miqorz wrote: | PickledOnion wrote: | Code: | emerge -a development-sources |
|
I'm one of the few who doesn't like gentoo sources I guess. |
No, I never have a gentoo sources kernel on my computer. But I think someone who asks how to emerge one should know how to.
I personally roll my own or use Nitro for a laugh but I don't really have the time to play with Nitro or Love anymore, I need as much usablity as possible |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Deranger Veteran
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 1215
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
2.6.9-rc4-nitro2 ...until 2.6.9-nitro1 comes
migorz wrote: |
I'm one of the few who doesn't like gentoo sources I guess.
|
I don't like them either. development-sources is definately the best non-experimental kernel choice. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sobers_2002 Veteran
Joined: 16 Mar 2004 Posts: 1128
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
blue.sca l33t
Joined: 28 Aug 2003 Posts: 680 Location: Mainz, Germany
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2.6.7-love7, the best, most stable and matured kernel i've seen since its release. all those newer kernels and patchsets cannot compete against its perfectness... _________________ geek by nature, linux by choice
i want my avatar back... thank you
:wq |
|
Back to top |
|
|
codergeek42 Bodhisattva
Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 5142 Location: Anaheim, CA (USA)
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2.6.9-ck1. Very responsive, and some very excellent and awesime kernel hacking done by Con Kolivas. _________________ ~~ Peter: Programmer, Mathematician, STEM & Free Software Advocate, Enlightened Agent, Transhumanist, Fedora contributor
Who am I? :: EFF & FSF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rcb1974 n00b
Joined: 12 Mar 2003 Posts: 56 Location: Ithaca, NY, USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:32 pm Post subject: Nitro sources are the best I think |
|
|
Oktane wrote: | 2.6.9-rc4-nitro2 ...until 2.6.9-nitro1 comes |
I use the Nitro sources too since I use the reiser4 filesystem. The 2.6.9-rc4-nitro kernel is both speedy and stable. Since I installed it a week ago, my machine and hasn't crashed once. The mm sources however, frequently cause my machine to hang. When is Nitro going to release the finalized 2.6.9 version of his kernel? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
teutzz Guru
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 333 Location: .ro
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
when mm-sources for 2.6.9 stable si out _________________ Cand nu stii ce sa raspunzi sau ce sa spui un simplu BLA ajunge... lolz |
|
Back to top |
|
|
codergeek42 Bodhisattva
Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 5142 Location: Anaheim, CA (USA)
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
teutzz wrote: | when mm-sources for 2.6.9 stable si out | with all due respect, I don't think 'mm-sources' and 'stable' belong in the same sentence without the word 'not' _________________ ~~ Peter: Programmer, Mathematician, STEM & Free Software Advocate, Enlightened Agent, Transhumanist, Fedora contributor
Who am I? :: EFF & FSF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
teutzz Guru
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 333 Location: .ro
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i was refering to mm-sources for 2.6.9 stable (as in final, not a rc) _________________ Cand nu stii ce sa raspunzi sau ce sa spui un simplu BLA ajunge... lolz |
|
Back to top |
|
|
codergeek42 Bodhisattva
Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 5142 Location: Anaheim, CA (USA)
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
teutzz wrote: | i was refering to mm-sources for 2.6.9 stable (as in final, not a rc) | Ah. I see. _________________ ~~ Peter: Programmer, Mathematician, STEM & Free Software Advocate, Enlightened Agent, Transhumanist, Fedora contributor
Who am I? :: EFF & FSF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Raffi l33t
Joined: 17 Mar 2003 Posts: 731 Location: Moscow, Id.
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So has anyone else noticed that 2.6.9 is very broken when it comes to NFS?
I also had trouble with the aacraid driver. I have backed down to 2.6.7 to try to make things better. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vcetina n00b
Joined: 27 Sep 2004 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi guys i have a few questions, what do i need to run nitro sources?, do i need develoment-sources installed? and after that apply the nitro patchset?.
TIA _________________ Linux is freedom.
Gentoo is freedom with power!
Dell latitude C640 256RAM P4 1.8 Ghz ATI 7500M |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dblaci n00b
Joined: 05 Oct 2004 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vcetina wrote: | Hi guys i have a few questions, what do i need to run nitro sources?, do i need develoment-sources installed? and after that apply the nitro patchset?.
TIA |
Look at here:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=239257 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
piewie Guru
Joined: 26 Sep 2002 Posts: 494 Location: old Europe
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2.6.7-x completly was a really good release.
2.6.8 was to buggy and 2.6.9 begins buggy again.
It seems that a new kernel releases brings a set of new bugs to the users.
What is this for a strategy, when a new piece of hardware is supported and for excample parallel printer support disappear? There regulary are problems with cdrecord - this is not necessary. Why must normal user patch the kernel, when someone needs new hardware support? So let the person with the new hardware patch the kernel and give us a stable version with full cdrtools and nvidia support.
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dblaci n00b
Joined: 05 Oct 2004 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree.
I have to use 2.6.7 because it really works...
I tried all (i mean really almost all) releases, rcs, patchsets, but non of them were working perfect.
Problems were some of these:
vmware dies. (i know about the 1GB lowmem etc. it's not the problem)
cd writing (at least as user) .......... in vmware too. (i have scsi rescorder)
ati-drivers emerge fails. (i made patches for the mm series by hand, and from forums)
OR/AND
unstable...
why am i keep trying new releases?
well: they are really faster (i feel it with X)
that's all. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|