View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
brims Guru
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 Posts: 492 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 8:46 pm Post subject: Firefox > 1.0.4 |
|
|
I'm posting here because the Mozilla Foundation really screwed up and anything above 1.0.4 shouldn't be supported by Gentoo. Firefox after 1.0.4 just destroyed my extensions. Anybody know why we are seeing such bad products from the Mozilla Foundation? I think there needs to be a release to undo all they did in 1.0.5 and 1.0.6. I downloaded the 1.0.4 ebuild and tried installing it, but it gives me a couple of errors:
Code: | Please upgrade your package (mozilla-firefox-1.0.4) to use toolchain-funcs.eclass |
and
Code: |
* Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE! Value for $EPATCH_SOURCE is:
*
* /usr/local/portage/www-client/mozilla-firefox/files/mozilla-hppa.patch
* ( mozilla-hppa.patch )
!!! ERROR: www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.0.4 failed.
!!! Function epatch, Line 217, Exitcode 0
!!! Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE!
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message. |
Can anyone help me out?
Last edited by brims on Sun Aug 07, 2005 8:49 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yabbadabbadont Advocate
Joined: 14 Mar 2003 Posts: 4791 Location: 2 exits past crazy
|
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
EDIT: 1.0.6 is the only binary ebuild in portage for firefox.
The new versions were to plug security holes. As I understand it, part of that required changing the interfaces to extensions, hence your problems. If you are having trouble with older version ebuilds, you might try the binary ebuild version instead. e.g. mozilla-firefox-bin-1.0.4
Last edited by yabbadabbadont on Sun Aug 07, 2005 8:51 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brims Guru
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 Posts: 492 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, so basically we have to wait for the extension people to get up to speed? Great. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yabbadabbadont Advocate
Joined: 14 Mar 2003 Posts: 4791 Location: 2 exits past crazy
|
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pretty much. If you have an extension you can't live without, start bugging the developer to update it... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martin.k Guru
Joined: 28 Nov 2004 Posts: 493 Location: Wylatowo, Polska
|
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 9:39 pm Post subject: Sad but true |
|
|
I must admit that there is something wrong with firefox > 1.0.4 both on win and linux machines.
I just downgraded all my desktops at work from 1.0.6 to 1.0.4, which seems to be the last usable
FF 1.0.6 is slower than 1.0.4 and less stable. _________________ linux-2.6.17 +ck +R4 +lockless +genetic-as +... więcej nie pamiętam
LRU #299256 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yabbadabbadont Advocate
Joined: 14 Mar 2003 Posts: 4791 Location: 2 exits past crazy
|
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm using mozilla-firefox-bin-1.0.6-r2 and haven't had any problems or noticed any slow-downs.
I only have one extension installed though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brims Guru
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 Posts: 492 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I got a friend with the same machine as mine, and similar use/cflags to make a binary for me. Untill everything works again I will only be using 1.0.4. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Archangel1 Veteran
Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Posts: 1212 Location: Work
|
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I haven't had any issues with 1.06.
1.05 was known to destroy extensions, which is why they released 1.06 so shortly afterwards.
I haven't noticed any stability problems though - admittedly I am using a localised ebuild, which may be subtly different (although I doubt it). _________________ What are you, stupid? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiel.wells Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 10 Sep 2004 Posts: 97
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm using the latest release of ~amd64 firefox, and have had 0 problems with any extensions or anything... _________________ AMD Athlon64 3000+ Winchester Core @ 1.813 GHz
Asus A8N5X
2GB RAM (4x512) PC3200 400MHz
1 200 GB HDD (SATA), 1 250GB HDD (SATA)
1 NEC DVD-RW, 1 DVD-R/CD-RW
420W Enermax ATX 2.0 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AaronPPC Guru
Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 522 Location: Tucson, AZ
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have not had any problems with 1.0.6 here. All my extensions work and it hasn't crashed once. _________________ --Aaron |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brims Guru
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 Posts: 492 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 2:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
The posts saying you're copies of 1.0.6 are working don't help at all. For me that version doesn't work, so your copy working isn't going to allow me to use the updated version of Firefox. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yabbadabbadont Advocate
Joined: 14 Mar 2003 Posts: 4791 Location: 2 exits past crazy
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good point.
Perhaps it is only one or two of your installed extensions that are causing the issues. Have you tried disabling all of the installed extensions and seeing if you still have instability issues? If so, then an older version is your only choice. If not, enable one extension at a time until Firefox becomes unstable. Then you can decide if that extension is worth using a version of Firefox that contains security holes. (You will also know which extension writer to bug for an updated version) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brims Guru
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 Posts: 492 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
All I know is Firefox is way more secure than IE, and I'm on a Linux machine as a regular user. I'll stick with the older version of Firefox. If the machine gets comprimised, I have the install disk somewhere around here. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Archangel1 Veteran
Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Posts: 1212 Location: Work
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 5:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
brims wrote: | The posts saying you're copies of 1.0.6 are working don't help at all. For me that version doesn't work, so your copy working isn't going to allow me to use the updated version of Firefox. |
No, they don't help there, but mine at least was in reply to your original post where you said "anything above 1.0.4 shouldn't be supported by Gentoo". If 1.0.6 works fine for some/most people there's no reason it shouldn't be supported by Gentoo - they certainly shouldn't be holding off making it available given there're security flaws in 1.0.4. _________________ What are you, stupid? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brot Guru
Joined: 06 Apr 2004 Posts: 322
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 7:22 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
The new version _should_ work everywhere. The 1.5 release was kind of broken, but that was fixed (very fast) with releasing 1.6 .
www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.0.6-r4
works very well here. Maybe lowering your cflags helps? (on my machine: CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -fomit-frame-pointer -frename-registers -funit-at-a-time -pipe" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brims Guru
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 Posts: 492 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Archangel1 wrote: | No, they don't help there, but mine at least was in reply to your original post where you said "anything above 1.0.4 shouldn't be supported by Gentoo". If 1.0.6 works fine for some/most people there's no reason it shouldn't be supported by Gentoo - they certainly shouldn't be holding off making it available given there're security flaws in 1.0.4. |
I know a lot of people with >= 1.0.5 problems.
brot wrote: | Maybe lowering your cflags helps? (on my machine: CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -fomit-frame-pointer -frename-registers -funit-at-a-time -pipe" |
My cflags are pretty low as is. CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe" I guess I'll wait for 1.5 in August or whenever they release it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yngwin Retired Dev
Joined: 19 Dec 2002 Posts: 4572 Location: Suzhou, China
|
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use Deer Park alpha 2 and it's behaving very good, very stable for an alpha. I also get most (but not all) extensions to work on this. _________________ "Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln
Free Culture | Defective by Design | EFF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brims Guru
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 Posts: 492 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds like a game, and I couldn't figure out why you'd be talking about a game. I'd like to try that out, but I don't like installing third party software because I get all these stray files on my system from the install. I'll wait for 1.5 to be officially released. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Archangel1 Veteran
Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Posts: 1212 Location: Work
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
brims wrote: | Archangel1 wrote: | No, they don't help there, but mine at least was in reply to your original post where you said "anything above 1.0.4 shouldn't be supported by Gentoo". If 1.0.6 works fine for some/most people there's no reason it shouldn't be supported by Gentoo - they certainly shouldn't be holding off making it available given there're security flaws in 1.0.4. |
I know a lot of people with >= 1.0.5 problems. |
Okay, but that's still no reason for claiming Gentoo shouldn't support it.
Maybe you have to go and get a later version of the extensions; it's not the end of the world... _________________ What are you, stupid? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dlareh Advocate
Joined: 06 Aug 2005 Posts: 2102
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Firefox has been steadily decreasing in stability since 0.7 and 0.8 or so. It's very sad. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brot Guru
Joined: 06 Apr 2004 Posts: 322
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dlareh wrote: | Firefox has been steadily decreasing in stability since 0.7 and 0.8 or so. It's very sad. |
I never had a crash with firefox > 0.8 . Never. In Linux.
At my brothers pc firefox crashed more or less regulary, but this seemed to be the messed up Windows installation. ( I know Windows is messed up from the first start, but you know what i mean ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yngwin Retired Dev
Joined: 19 Dec 2002 Posts: 4572 Location: Suzhou, China
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
brims wrote: | Sounds like a game, and I couldn't figure out why you'd be talking about a game. I'd like to try that out, but I don't like installing third party software because I get all these stray files on my system from the install. I'll wait for 1.5 to be officially released. |
It's not a game, Deer Park is the name used for the development version of Firefox right now, so basically it's the alpha of what is becoming Firefox 1.5 (the beta should be coming very soon). There is an ebuild and discussion about it here: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-347250.html _________________ "Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln
Free Culture | Defective by Design | EFF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brims Guru
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 Posts: 492 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Archangel1 wrote: | Okay, but that's still no reason for claiming Gentoo shouldn't support it.
Maybe you have to go and get a later version of the extensions; it's not the end of the world... |
I get the latest versions of the extensions, it is the end of my browsing world if my browser is broken. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dlareh Advocate
Joined: 06 Aug 2005 Posts: 2102
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can't afford to use any extentions anymore. That way the blame for the crashes is squarely on the mozilla folks.
I have used at least five DIFFERENT machines on which IE 6.0 has been more stable than firefox 0.9+. Doesn't matter whether it's under windows or linux. Even firefox on knoppix crashes. It happens more often when I visit complex pages, which work fine in all other browsers. http://anandtech.com is one of the more extreme examples... sometimes firefox 0.9+ will just crash instantly when it's loaded yet it works fine in previous versions and mozilla proper.
Last edited by Dlareh on Wed Aug 10, 2005 11:10 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yabbadabbadont Advocate
Joined: 14 Mar 2003 Posts: 4791 Location: 2 exits past crazy
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That is a pretty neat site. Thanks for the link.
By the way, I had no problem with the site at all.
Could be because I have java, javascript, and cookies disabled.
I'll try turning on various things and see what happens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|