View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
neuron Advocate
Joined: 28 May 2002 Posts: 2371
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:40 pm Post subject: NFS question |
|
|
I'm currently using samba to access my server, but I've had some problems with it lately, and either way I've found nfs to be considerably less resource hungry (encrypted hd's, so cpu is a bottleneck, I get 4mb/sec with samba and 7mb/sec with nfs!), with samba I need a login to access my server, but for nfs (as far as I understand it) read-write control is by ip, not that I dont trust the people on this network, but stealing an ip isn't exactly hard.
Is there any way to do some confirmation thing that that ip is actually the box it should be? And as I said cpu is a bottleneck so I'd rather not mount through ssh. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nightblade Guru
Joined: 20 Jul 2004 Posts: 368 Location: back from SE Asia
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if the NFS client and server are on the same subnet, you can use a static arp entry to uniquely correlate the IP address with the MAC address. This would make messing up with IPs much harder (for every protocol/service, not just NFS), and would protect you from ARP poisoning attacks as well. _________________ In God we trust. All the others must provide a valid X.509 certificate |
|
Back to top |
|
|
neuron Advocate
Joined: 28 May 2002 Posts: 2371
|
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2004 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
would make it a bit harder I suppose, it's still possible to alter the MAC address from the bios'es of two of the computers I got standing here (nforce2 chipsets with onboard networking). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nightblade Guru
Joined: 20 Jul 2004 Posts: 368 Location: back from SE Asia
|
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2004 1:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Depends on the situation: keep in mind that switches usually complain when they see the same unicast MAC on more than one port and this would make things hard for someone trying to spoof both the IP and the MAC address. _________________ In God we trust. All the others must provide a valid X.509 certificate |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|