View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Goya13 n00b
Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 59
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 12:05 am Post subject: Laptop WM's and DE's |
|
|
Hey,
just made this thread because I'm curious to see what you guys are using. For me, KDE is almost perfect, but bloated. All i need is the ability to have a triangle next to the menu button (window decoration) that can easily move a window the front of the screen and keep it there. I also need a nice panel for battery and wireless monitoring.
Anyways, I'm trying out fluxbox, but can't get the triangle thing down. Otherwise it would be my favorite!
What do y'all use? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ambient n00b
Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 10 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I use KDE. It is perfect. It is not bloated by any means. Bloated is that when you have no features but much slowness and memory consumption. Well KDE has moderate CPU and memory consumption but a feature set like no other! KLaptop is great too. I don't need some gkrellm or wm* crap which does not look nice at all. I just need to get standby and hibernate working. Otherwise this is a dream DE. KDE apps have also matured quite nicely. There are only few non-KDE apps that I use anymore.
P.S. The standby and hibernate issue is not because of KDE, but because of bad drivers. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Goya13 n00b
Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 59
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
What about startup times and ridiculous swap usage?
Don't those things annoy you??? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
seppe Guru
Joined: 01 Sep 2003 Posts: 431 Location: Hove, Antwerp, Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
I use XFCE 4.2 beta 2, it's a lightweight desktop environment and their upcoming 4.2 release adds a LOT of nice things.
Here is a screenshot from my laptop running XFCE 4.2 where I show some new stuff since 4.2. I run the taskbar-plugin as wel so I can have a taskbar on my normal panel which I can expand to fill the screen, just as in Gnome, KDE and Windows.
Give it a try! Release Candidate 1 is out and will be in portage soon!
More info at http://www.xfce.org/ _________________ nitro-sources, because between stable and experimental there exists only speed
Latest release I made: 2.6.13.2-nitro1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ambient n00b
Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 10 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Goya13 wrote: | What about startup times and ridiculous swap usage?
Don't those things annoy you??? |
Startup time? It's only something like 15 seconds. So to answer your first question: no. Ridiculous swap usage? What's that. If it'd be Windows i'd understand what you are talking about but not in this case. I have 512MB memory and rarely in KDE anything is put onto swap. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LostSon Guru
Joined: 21 Nov 2003 Posts: 514 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
XFCE |
|
Back to top |
|
|
buzzin Apprentice
Joined: 17 Oct 2003 Posts: 264 Location: St. Albans, UK.
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 1:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
I like KDE for general use and fluxbox for gaming.
I argee with the poster about kde being bloated. The splitting up of KDE, as announced in 'Gentoo Weekly Newsletter 15 November 2004' should help with this. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
raday n00b
Joined: 02 Sep 2002 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 2:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've been trying out a lot of WM's on my laptop as well. I did like KDE quite a bit.
But as of late I have been using the following combination:
- pekwm (CVS version)
- Rox-filer (A bottom ROX-Panel)
- gdesklets (psi displays: clock.display popmail.display)
It works great. Pekwm is very customizable, I have been able to set up a lot of keyboard shortcuts for common tasks. I was also able to customize the menu to display my current battery info, so no need for a battery applet.
I am very happy and productive in this environment. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ambient n00b
Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 10 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 5:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
One point which i failed to mention was also the consistent look and feel of KDE. I'm a very aestethic person so I need my apps to look the same. With Gimp and Bittornado I can make an exception, but otherwise KDE with Plastik style and Nuvola icons is very nice looking. I just can't stand using 5 different toolkits with my programs. It's unbearable. The point is I don't have to. KDE programs are good enough and some even better.
The one thing which I don't get is why people always say that KDE is bloat. Try doing a Konsole with 7 tabs versus 7 aterms. Konsole wins. Integration brings efficiency to memory consumption. Qt is also very fast, much faster than GTK+ 2 in my computer (haven't done any tests though - this is based just on my feel of the UI and widgets).
I haven't much tested XFCE, mainly because it was too hard to configure and was mostly just a glorified WM, not a DE - well perhaps a very light DE . And ROX does not please me aesthetically.
Nothing in free Linux world beats the power of integration in KDE.
This is just my take on things. I hope you find you favourite WM/DE too
P.S. "Splitting of KDE"? Had to answer to that too. Are you talking about the thing that KDE comes with too many unnecessary programs. This is easily remediable. Just install kdebase and kdelibs. Then install whichever programs you want. Simple |
|
Back to top |
|
|
seppe Guru
Joined: 01 Sep 2003 Posts: 431 Location: Hove, Antwerp, Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Believe me, the upcoming XFCE 4.2 is more DE than a WM. _________________ nitro-sources, because between stable and experimental there exists only speed
Latest release I made: 2.6.13.2-nitro1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ahubu Guru
Joined: 16 Aug 2003 Posts: 400 Location: Groningen, The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gnome/openbox. If gnome is too heavy, just openbox. Using rox as a filemanager, very fast.
I was pretty charmed by XFCE in the beginning, but I never figured out how to drop the toolbar(s). They just had to be onscreen for some reason. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
seppe Guru
Joined: 01 Sep 2003 Posts: 431 Location: Hove, Antwerp, Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ahbuist wrote: |
I was pretty charmed by XFCE in the beginning, but I never figured out how to drop the toolbar(s). They just had to be onscreen for some reason. |
You can edit the xinit script used by XFCE and comment out xftaskbar and stuff .. or kill the panel and save your session. _________________ nitro-sources, because between stable and experimental there exists only speed
Latest release I made: 2.6.13.2-nitro1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|