View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
barry Apprentice
Joined: 01 May 2002 Posts: 170 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed May 15, 2002 6:38 pm Post subject: icc 6 compilation |
|
|
Has anyone managed to get much compiled using Intel's compiler? The benchmarks are certainly looking impressive with version 6.
http://www.coyotegulch.com/
It seems that libtool can't handle icc, so just about any builds including shared libraries will fail. What's the workaround for this? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sibn n00b
Joined: 15 May 2002 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Wed May 15, 2002 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have been tempted to try icc just for the fun of it, but there is one major issue to take into account: icc is only for x86 processors. I'm not interested in immediately alienating a portion of my audience just by catering to my own architecture.
The other thing is that it's perfectly well possible to build shared libraries without libtool- it's just a little easier. Unless you want to build the shared libs on multiple architectures, in which case it's significantly more complex. _________________ Hey um, this is my signature. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
klieber Bodhisattva
Joined: 17 Apr 2002 Posts: 3657 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Wed May 15, 2002 6:56 pm Post subject: Re: icc 6 compilation |
|
|
barry wrote: | Has anyone managed to get much compiled using Intel's compiler? |
This was discussed a while back on the mailing list. Might check the archives for more info.
Additionally, I seem to remember that one of the glaring problems with icc was that the kernel wouldn't compile correctly with it.
--kurt _________________ The problem with political jokes is that they get elected |
|
Back to top |
|
|
barry Apprentice
Joined: 01 May 2002 Posts: 170 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed May 15, 2002 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It was mentioned a while ago, but this was before the new version was released, which can compile the kernel and is mostly compatible with gcc.
I doubt anybody expects a distribution compiled entirely with icc rather than gcc; certain packages would seemingly gain a large performance boost though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|