View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Lokheed Veteran
Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Posts: 1295 Location: /usr/src/linux
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 3:01 am Post subject: Xorg-X11 6.8.1.901 |
|
|
Anyone emerge it yet, thoughts, comments, etc. ?
I didnt find any posts about it so I thought I would make one. Just finished emerging it (under 2 hours which really really impresses me) and it is really responsive. Notice improvement in mouse and just general useage...but it could be the placebo affect. Anyway just wanted to see what everyone else thought as I was a little shaky in doing it, but happy I did |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiel.wells Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 10 Sep 2004 Posts: 97
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have it emerged, and other than all my fonts look like Apple ones (which isn't bad, by any means), I can't tell the difference.
It works though, so that's cool. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rOss^64 n00b
Joined: 19 Dec 2004 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
kiel.wells wrote: | I have it emerged, and other than all my fonts look like Apple ones (which isn't bad, by any means), I can't tell the difference.
It works though, so that's cool. |
same here i think freetype went ape shit on my fonts.
* media-libs/freetype-2.1.9-r1 _________________ ==< Linux brownstar 2.6.17-gentoo-r4 #1 PREEMPT Thu Jul 27 00:09:38 MDT 2006 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 FX-55 Processor GNU/Linux >== |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John5788 Advocate
Joined: 06 Apr 2004 Posts: 2140 Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
any cool new features? _________________ John5788 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Epyon l33t
Joined: 11 Sep 2003 Posts: 754 Location: NJ, USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
I haven't noticed any difference so far. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IvanHoe l33t
Joined: 05 Oct 2002 Posts: 658
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Since I added bindist to my USE flags and re-emerged freetype my fonts have never looked better. However, I don't know if I can attribute any of it to the new xorg. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lokheed Veteran
Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Posts: 1295 Location: /usr/src/linux
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I had freetype 2.1.9-r1 before I emerged the new Xorg..no problems then and no problems now...
Dont have bindist in my USE flags either, lucked out I guess. I dont notice anything new either.
John5788, I think mostly what Xorg has done is update the internal version of freetype (2.1. and change the location of a lot of the X server. Most things finally point to Xorg so they are weening away from the xfree directory. Alot of other changes in directory structure but other then that, I dont think you can really expect much...but its something to compile |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Deranger Veteran
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 1215
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Emerged it yesterday and I can't tell the difference. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ateo Advocate
Joined: 02 Jun 2003 Posts: 2021 Location: Republic of California
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Haven't noticed any difference yet.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Merlin-TC l33t
Joined: 16 May 2003 Posts: 603 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am fighting with my fonts for a long time now and they never looked perfect....anyway, xorg has some flags I am not clear about.
These flags are: font-server, bitmap-fonts, truetype-fonts, type1-fonts.
What of these flags do I need and what do they do?
Do they just emerge more fonts of these different types?
And what about the font-server flag? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IvanHoe l33t
Joined: 05 Oct 2002 Posts: 658
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Merlin-TC wrote: | I am fighting with my fonts for a long time now and they never looked perfect....anyway, xorg has some flags I am not clear about.
These flags are: font-server, bitmap-fonts, truetype-fonts, type1-fonts.
What of these flags do I need and what do they do?
Do they just emerge more fonts of these different types?
And what about the font-server flag? |
Unfortunately, a lot of the fonts that come with X look really crappy. To get around this you can remap some face names, just create the file ".fonts.conf" in your home directory and put this into it:
Code: | <?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<!-- /etc/fonts/fonts.conf file to configure system font access -->
<fontconfig>
<!--
Replace 'Helvetica' it with 'Bitstream Vera Sans'
-->
<match target="pattern">
<test qual="any" name="family">
<string>Helvetica</string>
</test>
<edit name="family" mode="assign">
<string>Bitstream Vera Sans</string>
</edit>
</match>
<!--
Replace 'Times' it with 'Bitstream Vera Serif'
-->
<match target="pattern">
<test qual="any" name="family">
<string>Times</string>
</test>
<edit name="family" mode="assign">
<string>Bitstream Vera Serif</string>
</edit>
</match>
<!--
Replace 'Lucida' it with 'Bitstream Vera Sans'
-->
<match target="pattern">
<test qual="any" name="family">
<string>Lucida</string>
</test>
<edit name="family" mode="assign">
<string>Bitstream Vera Sans</string>
</edit>
</match>
</fontconfig> |
You'll have to restart X to effect the change. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jinxos n00b
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 32 Location: Athens, Greece
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 9:55 am Post subject: ATI troubles... |
|
|
I upgraded from Xorg 6.8.0-r3 to 6.8.1.901 last night and didn't notice much difference (my fonts where ok at least ) except the fact that running GLXgears now freezes my box... at least I can Sync, Unmount, reBoot using SysRq without causing any damage...
Same config with 6.8.0-r3 works like a charm... ~1250fps on my Radeon 7500
J. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Deranger Veteran
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 1215
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
OT: How do I enable SysRq key on 2.6.9/2.6.10? I don't see it under kernel hacking, is there somekind of patch or what? Grepping .config doesn't show it either... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AlterEgo Veteran
Joined: 25 Apr 2002 Posts: 1619
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oktane wrote: | OT: How do I enable SysRq key on 2.6.9/2.6.10? I don't see it under kernel hacking, is there somekind of patch or what? Grepping .config doesn't show it either... |
# Kernel hacking
#
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
# CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is not set
2.6.10 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Deranger Veteran
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 1215
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
AlterEgo wrote: | Oktane wrote: | OT: How do I enable SysRq key on 2.6.9/2.6.10? I don't see it under kernel hacking, is there somekind of patch or what? Grepping .config doesn't show it either... |
# Kernel hacking
#
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
# CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is not set
2.6.10 |
Ah, stupid me! I didn't had "Kernel debugging"
Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
b0fh Guru
Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 426
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hm, although I merged it with "insecure-drivers" in USE, dri doesn't run with my s3 savage |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cossins Veteran
Joined: 21 Mar 2003 Posts: 1136 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I got the dreaded "duplicate symbols" error, which I could only get rid of using the "dlloader" USE-flag*. This left the binary NVIDIA-driver unusable (loads of symbol errors if I try to load them), so I'm stuck with nv. Which has really crappy 2D-performance due to absence of RenderAccel, and no 3D at all.
Is there a way to get rid of the "duplicate symbol" error without using dlloader?
- Simon
* ) Disables the built-in ELF-loader from XFree86 (for some reason, some really imbecilic idiot decided that XFree was going to have it's own shared object loader, instead of just using glibc's dload-API in ld-linux.so.2), and enables an experimental loader that uses ld-linux.so.2. _________________ who cares |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColeSlaw Apprentice
Joined: 19 Sep 2003 Posts: 176 Location: Kearney, NE USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cossins wrote: | I got the dreaded "duplicate symbols" error, which I could only get rid of using the "dlloader" USE-flag*. This left the binary NVIDIA-driver unusable (loads of symbol errors if I try to load them), so I'm stuck with nv. Which has really crappy 2D-performance due to absence of RenderAccel, and no 3D at all.
Is there a way to get rid of the "duplicate symbol" error without using dlloader?
- Simon
* ) Disables the built-in ELF-loader from XFree86 (for some reason, some really imbecilic idiot decided that XFree was going to have it's own shared object loader, instead of just using glibc's dload-API in ld-linux.so.2), and enables an experimental loader that uses ld-linux.so.2. |
This solution worked for me!
Taken From:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=265046
kmarasco wrote: | I was able to resolve this problem that is the result of compiling xorg with a hardened gcc profile. It looks like they have fixed this in xorg-x11-6.8.0-r4. But this may not solve your issue if you do not wish to use a hardened profile.
I found an issue with gcc-config where the hardened gcc profile is referenced even after changing to the vanilla gcc configuration. The problem is that no GCC_SPECS parameter is set in "/etc/env.d/gcc/xxx", where xxx is your vanilla gcc profile. If you add the following:
Code: | GCC_SPECS="/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/vanilla.specs" |
to the end of your environment settings and then change to the vanilla gcc profile using gcc-config, you should be able to compile xorg fine.
Don't forget to env-update after making the edit and again after using gcc-config. |
_________________ My Folding@home Stats!
Join the GLUE folding Team! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
asb002 n00b
Joined: 30 May 2003 Posts: 47 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OpenGL apps (like ut2004, America's Army, etc) no longer freeze up my system with the new Xorg version (I use the xorg-x11 OpenGL interface with my Radeon 8500) so I like it very much! Other than that, I haven't noticed a difference. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lokheed Veteran
Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Posts: 1295 Location: /usr/src/linux
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I get better score in GLXGEARS now. The default size I still get the same FPS, but even a slightest decrease and it shoots up much higher then before... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
placeholder Advocate
Joined: 07 Feb 2004 Posts: 2500
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One thing I noticed is that switching from a VT to X is much faster now.
Speaking of Xorg though, to those of you who use a display manager I would just like to say that xdm can be configured to look really nice. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
younker Apprentice
Joined: 18 Feb 2004 Posts: 280 Location: China
|
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Emerged yesterday, but when built other applications that needs libXft.la failed, It complains that can't /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.la,
how to solve this? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
placeholder Advocate
Joined: 07 Feb 2004 Posts: 2500
|
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 12:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
younker wrote: | Emerged yesterday, but when built other applications that needs libXft.la failed, It complains that can't /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.la,
how to solve this? |
I do not even have that file....
Code: | root@Fygor:: ls /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft* [~]
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.a /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.1.1
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.1 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2.1.2 |
That is what I have as far as libXft goes in that folder. Try sym-linking libXft.a to libXft.la and see where that gets you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roguelazer Veteran
Joined: 10 Feb 2003 Posts: 1233 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pwnz3r wrote: | Speaking of Xorg though, to those of you who use a display manager I would just like to say that xdm can be configured to look really nice. |
Hmm. Idea for a new thread, perhaps? _________________ Registered Linux User #263260 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Shazam Apprentice
Joined: 23 Nov 2004 Posts: 191 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
my big question concerning the new version, does it work with the ati-drivers 3.14.6 ?
or lets put it another way, do you get 3D hardware acceleration for Radeon Cards > 9200 ?
(like the 9600 i got) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|