Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Xorg-X11 6.8.1.901
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Lokheed
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 1295
Location: /usr/src/linux

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 3:01 am    Post subject: Xorg-X11 6.8.1.901 Reply with quote

Anyone emerge it yet, thoughts, comments, etc. ?

I didnt find any posts about it so I thought I would make one. Just finished emerging it (under 2 hours which really really impresses me) and it is really responsive. Notice improvement in mouse and just general useage...but it could be the placebo affect. Anyway just wanted to see what everyone else thought as I was a little shaky in doing it, but happy I did ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kiel.wells
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 10 Sep 2004
Posts: 97

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have it emerged, and other than all my fonts look like Apple ones (which isn't bad, by any means), I can't tell the difference.

It works though, so that's cool.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rOss^64
n00b
n00b


Joined: 19 Dec 2004
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kiel.wells wrote:
I have it emerged, and other than all my fonts look like Apple ones (which isn't bad, by any means), I can't tell the difference.

It works though, so that's cool.


same here i think freetype went ape shit on my fonts.

* media-libs/freetype-2.1.9-r1
_________________
==< Linux brownstar 2.6.17-gentoo-r4 #1 PREEMPT Thu Jul 27 00:09:38 MDT 2006 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 FX-55 Processor GNU/Linux >==
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John5788
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 2140
Location: 127.0.0.1

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

any cool new features?
_________________
John5788
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Epyon
l33t
l33t


Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Posts: 754
Location: NJ, USA

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 7:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I haven't noticed any difference so far.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IvanHoe
l33t
l33t


Joined: 05 Oct 2002
Posts: 658

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Since I added bindist to my USE flags and re-emerged freetype my fonts have never looked better. However, I don't know if I can attribute any of it to the new xorg.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lokheed
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 1295
Location: /usr/src/linux

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 7:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had freetype 2.1.9-r1 before I emerged the new Xorg..no problems then and no problems now...

Dont have bindist in my USE flags either, lucked out I guess. I dont notice anything new either.

John5788, I think mostly what Xorg has done is update the internal version of freetype (2.1.8) and change the location of a lot of the X server. Most things finally point to Xorg so they are weening away from the xfree directory. Alot of other changes in directory structure but other then that, I dont think you can really expect much...but its something to compile ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Deranger
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 1215

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 8:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Emerged it yesterday and I can't tell the difference.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ateo
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 02 Jun 2003
Posts: 2021
Location: Republic of California

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 8:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Haven't noticed any difference yet....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Merlin-TC
l33t
l33t


Joined: 16 May 2003
Posts: 603
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 8:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am fighting with my fonts for a long time now and they never looked perfect....anyway, xorg has some flags I am not clear about.

These flags are: font-server, bitmap-fonts, truetype-fonts, type1-fonts.

What of these flags do I need and what do they do?
Do they just emerge more fonts of these different types?
And what about the font-server flag?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IvanHoe
l33t
l33t


Joined: 05 Oct 2002
Posts: 658

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 8:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Merlin-TC wrote:
I am fighting with my fonts for a long time now and they never looked perfect....anyway, xorg has some flags I am not clear about.

These flags are: font-server, bitmap-fonts, truetype-fonts, type1-fonts.

What of these flags do I need and what do they do?
Do they just emerge more fonts of these different types?
And what about the font-server flag?

Unfortunately, a lot of the fonts that come with X look really crappy. To get around this you can remap some face names, just create the file ".fonts.conf" in your home directory and put this into it:
Code:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<!-- /etc/fonts/fonts.conf file to configure system font access -->
<fontconfig>

<!--
  Replace 'Helvetica' it with 'Bitstream Vera Sans'
-->
<match target="pattern">
   <test qual="any" name="family">
      <string>Helvetica</string>
   </test>
   <edit name="family" mode="assign">
      <string>Bitstream Vera Sans</string>
   </edit>
</match>

<!--
  Replace 'Times' it with 'Bitstream Vera Serif'
-->
<match target="pattern">
   <test qual="any" name="family">
      <string>Times</string>
   </test>
   <edit name="family" mode="assign">
      <string>Bitstream Vera Serif</string>
   </edit>
</match>

<!--
  Replace 'Lucida' it with 'Bitstream Vera Sans'
-->
<match target="pattern">
   <test qual="any" name="family">
      <string>Lucida</string>
   </test>
   <edit name="family" mode="assign">
      <string>Bitstream Vera Sans</string>
   </edit>
</match>

</fontconfig>

You'll have to restart X to effect the change.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jinxos
n00b
n00b


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 32
Location: Athens, Greece

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 9:55 am    Post subject: ATI troubles... Reply with quote

I upgraded from Xorg 6.8.0-r3 to 6.8.1.901 last night and didn't notice much difference (my fonts where ok at least :) ) except the fact that running GLXgears now freezes my box... at least I can Sync, Unmount, reBoot using SysRq without causing any damage...

Same config with 6.8.0-r3 works like a charm... ~1250fps on my Radeon 7500

J.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Deranger
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 1215

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 10:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OT: How do I enable SysRq key on 2.6.9/2.6.10? I don't see it under kernel hacking, is there somekind of patch or what? Grepping .config doesn't show it either...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AlterEgo
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 25 Apr 2002
Posts: 1619

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 11:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oktane wrote:
OT: How do I enable SysRq key on 2.6.9/2.6.10? I don't see it under kernel hacking, is there somekind of patch or what? Grepping .config doesn't show it either...


# Kernel hacking
#
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
# CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is not set

2.6.10
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Deranger
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 1215

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 11:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

AlterEgo wrote:
Oktane wrote:
OT: How do I enable SysRq key on 2.6.9/2.6.10? I don't see it under kernel hacking, is there somekind of patch or what? Grepping .config doesn't show it either...


# Kernel hacking
#
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
# CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is not set

2.6.10

Ah, stupid me! I didn't had "Kernel debugging" :D

Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
b0fh
Guru
Guru


Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 426

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hm, although I merged it with "insecure-drivers" in USE, dri doesn't run with my s3 savage :(
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cossins
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 21 Mar 2003
Posts: 1136
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I got the dreaded "duplicate symbols" error, which I could only get rid of using the "dlloader" USE-flag*. This left the binary NVIDIA-driver unusable (loads of symbol errors if I try to load them), so I'm stuck with nv. Which has really crappy 2D-performance due to absence of RenderAccel, and no 3D at all.

Is there a way to get rid of the "duplicate symbol" error without using dlloader?

- Simon

* ) Disables the built-in ELF-loader from XFree86 (for some reason, some really imbecilic idiot decided that XFree was going to have it's own shared object loader, instead of just using glibc's dload-API in ld-linux.so.2), and enables an experimental loader that uses ld-linux.so.2.
_________________
who cares
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ColeSlaw
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 19 Sep 2003
Posts: 176
Location: Kearney, NE USA

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 7:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cossins wrote:
I got the dreaded "duplicate symbols" error, which I could only get rid of using the "dlloader" USE-flag*. This left the binary NVIDIA-driver unusable (loads of symbol errors if I try to load them), so I'm stuck with nv. Which has really crappy 2D-performance due to absence of RenderAccel, and no 3D at all.

Is there a way to get rid of the "duplicate symbol" error without using dlloader?

- Simon

* ) Disables the built-in ELF-loader from XFree86 (for some reason, some really imbecilic idiot decided that XFree was going to have it's own shared object loader, instead of just using glibc's dload-API in ld-linux.so.2), and enables an experimental loader that uses ld-linux.so.2.


This solution worked for me!

Taken From:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=265046

kmarasco wrote:
I was able to resolve this problem that is the result of compiling xorg with a hardened gcc profile. It looks like they have fixed this in xorg-x11-6.8.0-r4. But this may not solve your issue if you do not wish to use a hardened profile.

I found an issue with gcc-config where the hardened gcc profile is referenced even after changing to the vanilla gcc configuration. The problem is that no GCC_SPECS parameter is set in "/etc/env.d/gcc/xxx", where xxx is your vanilla gcc profile. If you add the following:
Code:
GCC_SPECS="/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/vanilla.specs"

to the end of your environment settings and then change to the vanilla gcc profile using gcc-config, you should be able to compile xorg fine.

Don't forget to env-update after making the edit and again after using gcc-config.

_________________
My Folding@home Stats!
Join the GLUE folding Team!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asb002
n00b
n00b


Joined: 30 May 2003
Posts: 47
Location: Rochester, NY, USA

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 8:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OpenGL apps (like ut2004, America's Army, etc) no longer freeze up my system with the new Xorg version (I use the xorg-x11 OpenGL interface with my Radeon 8500) so I like it very much! Other than that, I haven't noticed a difference.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lokheed
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 1295
Location: /usr/src/linux

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 9:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I get better score in GLXGEARS now. The default size I still get the same FPS, but even a slightest decrease and it shoots up much higher then before...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
placeholder
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 07 Feb 2004
Posts: 2500

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 11:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One thing I noticed is that switching from a VT to X is much faster now.

Speaking of Xorg though, to those of you who use a display manager I would just like to say that xdm can be configured to look really nice. :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
younker
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 280
Location: China

PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 12:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Emerged yesterday, but when built other applications that needs libXft.la failed, It complains that can't /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.la,

how to solve this?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
placeholder
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 07 Feb 2004
Posts: 2500

PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 12:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

younker wrote:
Emerged yesterday, but when built other applications that needs libXft.la failed, It complains that can't /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.la,

how to solve this?

I do not even have that file....

Code:
root@Fygor:: ls /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft*                                      [~]
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.a     /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.1.1
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so    /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.1  /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2.1.2


That is what I have as far as libXft goes in that folder. Try sym-linking libXft.a to libXft.la and see where that gets you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roguelazer
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 1233
Location: San Francisco, CA

PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 1:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pwnz3r wrote:
Speaking of Xorg though, to those of you who use a display manager I would just like to say that xdm can be configured to look really nice. :D


Hmm. Idea for a new thread, perhaps?
_________________
Registered Linux User #263260
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shazam
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 23 Nov 2004
Posts: 191
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 2:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

my big question concerning the new version, does it work with the ati-drivers 3.14.6 ?

or lets put it another way, do you get 3D hardware acceleration for Radeon Cards > 9200 ?

(like the 9600 i got)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum