Gentoo bug report and gtk+ 2.6 ????

[Naib]

Well gtk+ 2.6 has been out for quite a while now so I thought I would search bugzilla for a ebuild or some infomtion

has some Gentoo ebuild dev had attack of the power-crazies

There have been loads of closing bug request due to duplicate bug???
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75691
This ok is a duplicate bug as 74683

So...
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74683


Now there seems to be what is perceved as bug spamming. 1st so called bug-spam to do with gkt+2.6 is: Bug 74686
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74686
But this is to do with glib 2.6 with a circular duplicate bug referencing 74683

Errr since when is glib2.6 the same as gtk+2.6

next in the list

Bug 74687
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74687
But this is to do with Pango 2.6 with a circular duplicate bug reference to, you guessed it. 74683

Errr since when is pango2.6 the same as gtk+2.6???

next in list
is a bug that mentions glib2.6, pango2.6 and gkt+2.6 so ok duplicate bug request

then a few more duplicate bug request.

The point is the parent bug request is now a circular bug request to a closed bug request due to bug request spamming. Thus it seems that there is no longer a open bug request for

gtk+2.6
pango2.6
glib2.6

any reason how the system broke down?


how is gtk+2.6 a duplicate bug request for
_________________
#define HelloWorld int
#define Int main()
#define Return printf
#define Print return
#include <stdio>
HelloWorld Int {
Return("Hello, world!\n");
Print 0;

[Deathwing00]

The is Gentoo Forums Feedback, not Gentoo Bugzilla Feedback. Please, send your comments to the adequate place: https://bugs.gentoo.org/enter_bug.cgi?format=guided

[pjp]

As a suggestion, you could post an abbreviated version of your post here to the appropriate bugs. i.e., the pango bug, and then to the circular dependecy bug.
_________________
Quis separabit? Quo animo?