View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
curmudgeon42 n00b
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 69
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:54 pm Post subject: nvidia driver patch for 2.6.10 |
|
|
I ran into a problem with the latest NVidia drivers and the latest gentoo-dev-sources (2.6.10-r4). I have described this problem in detail in a previous post:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=277791&highlight=
After much Googling, I believe the problem is a known bug in the NVidia as described here:
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=42964&page=1&pp=15
That page also gives a patch to apply to the NVidia drivers as downloaded from NVidia's site.
Obviously, I would rather use emerge to get the latest NVidia drivers because then they remain within package management.
Is there a way to incorporate those patches while still using emerge and keeping the drivers under package mgmt? How would the steps in that post have to be modified?
Thanks,
~ Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keyson l33t
Joined: 10 Jun 2003 Posts: 830 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi
Looking at ebuild for latest 6629-r1 all patches is included.
I run 2.6.10-r4 whit this driver.
-Kjell |
|
Back to top |
|
|
curmudgeon42 n00b
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 69
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
when i do an "emerge --pretend nvidia-kernel" it tells me it is going to do version 1.0.6111-r3
how come it isn't giving me 6629-r1? i just ran emerge sync two days ago...
~ Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
curmudgeon42 n00b
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 69
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if i do an 'emerge --pretend =nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r1' it gives an error saying that that ebuild is masked
what gives?
~ Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
landon Apprentice
Joined: 09 Mar 2004 Posts: 159
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You're not too familiar with portage, are you? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
curmudgeon42 n00b
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 69
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no, thanks for the observation... ;-)
i haven't been running my Gentoo box for awhile because it's mobo had been fried. so i'm a bit rusty. do you think you could enlighten me?
Thanks,
~ Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GotTLoS n00b
Joined: 15 Sep 2002 Posts: 35
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
echo "media-video/nvidia-kernel ~x86" >> /etc/portage/package.keywords
emerge -pv nvidia-kernel |
|
Back to top |
|
|
curmudgeon42 n00b
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 69
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GotLos:
okay thanks but can you tell me why? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
curmudgeon42 n00b
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 69
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
okay that command seemed to do something, but i took another look at my Xorg.0.log and in the middle somewhere it gives:
NVIDIA XFree86 Driver 1.0-4496 Wed Jul 16 19:06:03 PDT 2003
Which I guess means that it isn't updating the driver...
Do I have to do something more than 'emerge nvidia-kernel' after pointing /usr/src/linux to the new kernel directory?
oh, and i have posted a log of X running in 2.4, which works, and X running in 2.6, which fails:
http://coffeegeek.net/Xorg.0.log-2.4-012005
http://coffeegeek.net/Xorg.0.log-2.6-012005
~ Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dsd Developer
Joined: 30 Mar 2003 Posts: 2162 Location: nr London
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
make sure that you also go into the testing tree for nvidia-glx
make sure that you have loaded the nvidia module before starting X _________________ http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd |
|
Back to top |
|
|
curmudgeon42 n00b
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 69
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dsd wrote: | make sure that you also go into the testing tree for nvidia-glx |
sorry, i know i've already demonstrated that i'm a noob, but i have no idea what that means
dsd wrote: | make sure that you have loaded the nvidia module before starting X |
before running X, an lsmod shows nvidia is loaded
Thanks for the continued help,
~ Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
curmudgeon42 n00b
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 69
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the 'nvidia' loaded in 2.4 is definitely different than 2.6. the sizes as reported by lsmod are 1,629,504 and 3,466,364 respectively.
~ Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
curmudgeon42 n00b
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 69
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well i figured out i am indeed a noob. i wasn't emerging nvidia-glx the whole time. didn't realize that there was a separate nvidia package.
thanks for everyone's help!
~ Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|