2005.0 GCC 3.4.3-r1 Compile Error - invalid assembler?

[JDHarris]

I'm trying to upgrade my gcc version from gcc3.4.3 to gcc3.4.3-r1. I've made one other post about it, but it was a completely different error, so sorry if this counts as a duplicate... I've upgraded the profile from 2004.3 to 2005.0 (following the documentation provided here) and when trying to compile gcc I get the following error:


make[3]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.4.3-r1/work/build/32/zlib'
gcc -DPACKAGE=\"zlib\" -DVERSION=\"1.1.4\" -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1-I. -I/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.4.3-r1/work/gcc-3.4.3/zlib -O2 -march=athlon64 -pipe -m32 -c /var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.4.3-r1/work/gcc-3.4.3/zlib/adler32.c
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:8: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `movzwq'
{standard input}:10: Error: bad register name `%r8d'
{standard input}:17: Error: bad register name `%r9'
{standard input}:20: Error: bad register name `%r8d'
{standard input}:22: Error: bad register name `%r8d'
{standard input}:23: Error: bad register name `%r8d'
{standard input}:27: Error: `(%rsi)' is not a valid 32 bit base/index expression
{standard input}:29: Error: `1(%rsi)' is not a valid 32 bit base/index expression
{standard input}:32: Error: `2(%rsi)' is not a valid 32 bit base/index expression
{standard input}:35: Error: `3(%rsi)' is not a valid 32 bit base/index expression
{standard input}:38: Error: `4(%rsi)' is not a valid 32 bit base/index expression
{standard input}:41: Error: `5(%rsi)' is not a valid 32 bit base/index expression
{standard input}:44: Error: `6(%rsi)' is not a valid 32 bit base/index expression
{standard input}:47: Error: `7(%rsi)' is not a valid 32 bit base/index expression
{standard input}:50: Error: `8(%rsi)' is not a valid 32 bit base/index expression
{standard input}:53: Error: `9(%rsi)' is not a valid 32 bit base/index expression
{standard input}:56: Error: `10(%rsi)' is not a valid 32 bit base/index expression
{standard input}:59: Error: `11(%rsi)' is not a valid 32 bit base/index expression
{standard input}:62: Error: `12(%rsi)' is not a valid 32 bit base/index expression
{standard input}:65: Error: `13(%rsi)' is not a valid 32 bit base/index expression
{standard input}:68: Error: `14(%rsi)' is not a valid 32 bit base/index expression
{standard input}:71: Error: `15(%rsi)' is not a valid 32 bit base/index expression
{standard input}:84: Error: `(%rsi)' is not a valid 32 bit base/index expression
{standard input}:91: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `movq'
{standard input}:92: Error: bad register name `%r9'
{standard input}:93: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `movq'
{standard input}:97: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `movq'
{standard input}:101: Error: bad register name `%r9'
{standard input}:102: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `movq'
{standard input}:109: Error: bad register name `%r8d'
{standard input}:112: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `movq'
make[3]: *** [adler32.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.4.3-r1/work/build/32/zlib'
make[2]: *** [multi-do] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.4.3-r1/work/build/zlib'
make[1]: *** [all-multi] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.4.3-r1/work/build/zlib'
make: *** [all-zlib] Error 2

!!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-3.4.3-r1 failed.
!!! Function gcc_do_make, Line 1067, Exitcode 2
!!! make failed with profiledbootstrap
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.


Any ideas? Why is it complaining about a valid 32 bit base/index expression? This is a 64-bit system...

[EDIT] I also just checked to see if I could compile glibc, it fails with the following error during the configure, but everything else on the system seems to compile just fine.

checking size of long double... configure: error: cannot compute sizeof (long double), 77
See `config.log' for more details.


One last thing to add in here... with the 32-bit libraries removed (per the instructions on the 2005.0 conversion), how do you run applications like OpenOffice that rely upon those libs?
_________________
Athlon 64 3500+
2 GB of RAM
2 74GB Raptors RAID 0
nVidia GeForce 6800 GT 256 MB

[moocha]

[Moonlight-Flower]

That doesn't help... tried that and -march=athlon64.

Um, a slightly related question: when you do a emerge -pv gcc on the 2005.0 profile, is your multilib USE flag masked? As I understand, it's supposed to be forced on, but because emerge doesn't show it in red if it's forced on, I can't tell, and it makes me a bit nervous...

For the glibc error, an "env-update" followed by "source /etc/profile" seemed to fix it for me.

[fredor]

Compiling glibc replaces the lib32 folders so you need to get this working first.
I had a problem with linux-headers so I went back to linux26-headers and everything compiled with 'emerge -e system' except libperl which has since been corrected.

[JDHarris]

I still get the same error. My CFLAGS has -march=athlon64 and -mtune=athlon64. I don't really understand why I would be getting errors about 32-bit assembly...
_________________
Athlon 64 3500+
2 GB of RAM
2 74GB Raptors RAID 0
nVidia GeForce 6800 GT 256 MB

[Loial]

I'm having the same problem
I think we get 32-bit assembly errors because the 2005.0 profile compiles both 64 and 32?
well anyway, i'm not sure...

[robet]

Same issue here, fixed it with "env-update && source /etc/profile".
_________________
no software patents in europe! | adopt an unanswered post.

[Moonlight-Flower]

[Loial]

nope, doesn't help here either

found a bugreport on the subject here:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78652

[Moonlight-Flower]

Just out of curiousity, what's everyone's gcc USE flags? I took out fortran, gcj, gtkj, and objc, and now my error message has transformed into:

[Moonlight-Flower]

I think I may have found a workaround. I downloaded the new glibc lib32s from http://mymirror.asiaosc.org/gentoo/releases/amd64/2005.0/profile_update/glibc-2.3.4.20041102-lib32.tar.bz2, unpacked them into the root directory, took "gcj" out of gcc's USE flags, and recompiled. It works now... I've got 3.4.3-r1 installed fine.

The assembler errors, if I had to guess, have something to do with GCJ. The incompatible .so errors were probably something to do with the new lib32 stuff that the 2005.0 profile update provides.

Perhaps someone else can try this to confirm if this does help?

[tcbounce]

Where else can we get this file? I've tried the files from emu-linux-x86-glibc and still having no joy, as the configure script for gcc is broken.

Cheers,

Luke

[ketjow]

[moocha]

[tcbounce]

Um the topic is about everyone not being able to get multilib and 2005.0 working NOT CFLAGS (i'm going to roll back soon! and mask all the ebuilds that break 2004.3 like emul-linux-baselibs-1000 )

We need to have suitable 32 bit C-libraries such as provided emul-linux-x86 when merging glibc in the multilib 2005.0 profile, or it don't work.

I have tried the libs from emul-linux-x86.... with 20041102 glibc and no job. They had files on the download mirrors for this that someone above reported solved this issue! Those files have been deleted from the mirrors and I can't find anything on google. Can someone host those glibc-32 bit libs??

Cheers,

Luke