| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
choenig
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 83
Location: EDDK, Germany
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2003 12:37 am Post subject: portage's really goin crazy... |
 |
|
Can anybody explain my this?:
(the important thing is the gnome (vfs) stuff)
| Code: |
luna ~ # emerge -u world --deep -p
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating world dependencies ...done!
[ebuild UD] app-text/ghostview-1.5 [1.5-r1]
[ebuild UD] dev-util/dialog-0.9_beta20020519 [0.9_beta20020814-r0]
[ebuild UD] app-text/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-r1 [4.1-r0]
[ebuild UD] net-www/lynx-2.8.4.1c [2.8.4.1d-r0]
[ebuild U ] app-text/sgmltools-lite-3.0.3-r6 [3.0.3-r5]
[ebuild UD] kde-base/arts-1.0.5a [1.1.0_rc5-r0]
[ebuild UD] kde-base/kdelibs-3.0.5a [3.1_rc5-r0]
[ebuild UD] media-libs/libpng-1.0.12-r2 [1.2.5-r2]
[ebuild UD] app-doc/doxygen-1.2.16 [1.2.18-r0]
[ebuild UD] app-doc/qt-docs-3.1.0 [3.1.1-r0]
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-common-1.2.4-r3
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/gnome-vfs-1.0.5-r3 [1.0.5-r2]
[ebuild U ] media-video/realplayer-8-r4 [8-r2]
luna ~ # emerge gnome-common -p
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-common-1.2.4-r3
luna ~ # emerge gnome-vfs -p
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild N ] net-libs/linc-0.5.5
[ebuild N ] dev-libs/libIDL-0.8.0
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/ORBit2-2.4.4
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/gconf-1.2.1 [1.0.8-r3]
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/bonobo-activation-1.0.4
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/libbonobo-2.0.1
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/gnome-vfs-2.0.4.1-r1 [1.0.5-r2]
|
take care, have fun
/christian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
keratos68
Guru
Joined: 27 Dec 2002
Posts: 561
Location: Blackpool, Lancashire, UK.
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2003 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Explain WHAT?
_________________
Someone told me that "..they only ever made one mistake...."
...and that's when they said they were wrong!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dalrain
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 02 Jul 2002
Posts: 136
Location: Wooster, OH USA
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2003 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Looks good to me. Portage is being perfectly logical as always, one package doesn't have deps, the other one does. By specifying common, you're asking for a specific part. (I think.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
keratos68
Guru
Joined: 27 Dec 2002
Posts: 561
Location: Blackpool, Lancashire, UK.
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2003 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dalrain wrote: | | Looks good to me. Portage is being perfectly logical as always, one package doesn't have deps, the other one does. By specifying common, you're asking for a specific part. (I think.) |
Agreed 
_________________
Someone told me that "..they only ever made one mistake...."
...and that's when they said they were wrong!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
choenig
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 83
Location: EDDK, Germany
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2003 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry guys,
when posting that, It was quite late, I missed the Version numbering  .
I was confused, because it wanted to install that much when emerging by hand, but the --update didn't want to install those stuff.
So, please forgive me 
take care, have fun
/christian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Portage & Programming
