View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sickalien n00b
Joined: 13 Mar 2003 Posts: 53 Location: Rosario/Argentina
|
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 2:23 pm Post subject: ipsec0 doesn't go up |
|
|
hi everyone
i'm configuring openswan between two gateways.
i had this already working previously with a redhat box.
after some work it seems that the vpn is working
Code: | ]
lilith root # ipsec auto --up bsas-rosario
112 "bsas-rosario" #3: STATE_QUICK_I1: initiate
004 "bsas-rosario" #3: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, IPsec SA established {ESP=>0x36be4959 <0x7c3684a9}
|
the problem is that the right side (subnet 192.168.0.0) does not have the interface ipsec0.
the left side (subnet 192.168.1.0) has it, and the pings are returned
Code: |
duke:~# ping 192.168.0.31
PING 192.168.0.31 (192.168.0.31): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.0.31: icmp_seq=0 ttl=127 time=84.4 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.31: icmp_seq=1 ttl=127 time=67.6 ms
|
the previous (redhat) configuration and the left side server were configured by someone else, so i don't know if i missing something.
do i have to declare the interface ipsec0 or something?
thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
n3mo l33t
Joined: 28 Mar 2004 Posts: 657 Location: In a Cruel World
|
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The interface ipsec0 is not show up in kernel 2.6, but I think this is better cause it's easyest to manage the firewall, thus this feature doesn't compromize the functionality, yuo cuold ping the other side of the lan, aren't you ?
_________________ Google, really. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sickalien n00b
Joined: 13 Mar 2003 Posts: 53 Location: Rosario/Argentina
|
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok, i see.
thanks for the data... i was going mad with this..
i will have to change the firewall rules to permit the packets go through...
is there any way to show ipsec0 by hand? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
n3mo l33t
Joined: 28 Mar 2004 Posts: 657 Location: In a Cruel World
|
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Reboot with 2.4 kernel ?
I really don't know, sorry... _________________ Google, really. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|