Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
nvidia open source driver
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
float-
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 31 Aug 2003
Posts: 174

PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 3:13 pm    Post subject: nvidia open source driver Reply with quote

I wonder if anyone has tryed the new nv driver in xorg 6.8.2 and how does it compare to the closed source one?

Last edited by float- on Fri Feb 18, 2005 4:05 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hds
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 2629
Location: Sprockhoevel [GER]

PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hmm, just wondering.. special reasons why you would like to get rid of the closed source nvidia drivers?
OTOH, yes, i would be interessted in this as well, just out of curiousity, though.. still running xorg 6.8.0-r4 over here ;)

hmm.. infact nvidia doesnt give out enough technical information, i really wonder about this new nv driver.. IMHO it could never support that many features as the closed source one by nvidia itself, but yours mileage might vary..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
codergeek42
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 5142
Location: Anaheim, CA (USA)

PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 3:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It (the nv driver) works nicely here. I _would_ compare it to the proprietary driver, but I _can't_, since the 1.0-6111 kernel module doesn't compile, and the 1.0-6629 drivers don't work with my Riva TNT2 card.
_________________
~~ Peter: Programmer, Mathematician, STEM & Free Software Advocate, Enlightened Agent, Transhumanist, Fedora contributor
Who am I? :: EFF & FSF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
float-
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 31 Aug 2003
Posts: 174

PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 4:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hds wrote:
hmm, just wondering.. special reasons why you would like to get rid of the closed source nvidia drivers?
OTOH, yes, i would be interessted in this as well, just out of curiousity, though.. still running xorg 6.8.0-r4 over here ;)

hmm.. infact nvidia doesnt give out enough technical information, i really wonder about this new nv driver.. IMHO it could never support that many features as the closed source one by nvidia itself, but yours mileage might vary..

Well freedom, why do we want Java open sourced?
However I agree that the driver will never be as good as the commerical one without nvidias support.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
codergeek42
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 5142
Location: Anaheim, CA (USA)

PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 4:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[off-topic]

float- wrote:
However I agree that the driver will never be as good as the commerical one without nvidas support.
While I agree with this sentiment, I would like to ask that you please not use the term 'commercial' as a synonym for proprietary (or "closed-source"). It needlessly confuses two entirely different concepts. Free software can be commercial too. Please read more about this isse on the FSF's website. Thanks.

[/off-topic]
_________________
~~ Peter: Programmer, Mathematician, STEM & Free Software Advocate, Enlightened Agent, Transhumanist, Fedora contributor
Who am I? :: EFF & FSF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hds
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 2629
Location: Sprockhoevel [GER]

PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

codergeek42 wrote:
It (the nv driver) works nicely here. I _would_ compare it to the proprietary driver, but I _can't_, since the 1.0-6111 kernel module doesn't compile, and the 1.0-6629 drivers don't work with my Riva TNT2 card.

did i understood this wrong? i understood him that way, that xorg 6.8.2 would have nvidia with 3D acceleration build in 8O
infact of this, you wouldnt need the nvidia kernels in portage at all.. hmm..

OTOH we dont ahve to argue about the nv driver, sure works, but no acceleration. just wondering 8O
well, didnt install 6.8.2 yet. - so i was just curious if it has 3D at all. otherwise the topic wouldnt make sense to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
codergeek42
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 5142
Location: Anaheim, CA (USA)

PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've checked glxinfo and it tells me I'm not using direct rendering (e.g., I'm not using any 3-D hardware acceleration).
_________________
~~ Peter: Programmer, Mathematician, STEM & Free Software Advocate, Enlightened Agent, Transhumanist, Fedora contributor
Who am I? :: EFF & FSF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
float-
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 31 Aug 2003
Posts: 174

PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 8:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

codergeek42 wrote:
[off-topic]

float- wrote:
However I agree that the driver will never be as good as the commerical one without nvidas support.
While I agree with this sentiment, I would like to ask that you please not use the term 'commercial' as a synonym for proprietary (or "closed-source"). It needlessly confuses two entirely different concepts. Free software can be commercial too. Please read more about this isse on the FSF's website. Thanks.

[/off-topic]


do you also say gnu/linux instead of just linux?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hds
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 2629
Location: Sprockhoevel [GER]

PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 12:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

float- wrote:

do you also say gnu/linux instead of just linux?

:lol:
well, should be enough to mention SCO/Linux, and lets assume all the rest is GNU :P
[leaving Unix Sys V, Xenix (and whatnot) apart, cause noone in here will use those anyway] ;)

just my 2cents (not "swedish kroners") 8)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Redeeman
l33t
l33t


Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 958
Location: Portugal

PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 12:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

codergeek42 wrote:
I've checked glxinfo and it tells me I'm not using direct rendering (e.g., I'm not using any 3-D hardware acceleration).


you would need direct rendering manager in the kernel, to get 3d acceleration from the xorg drivers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hds
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 2629
Location: Sprockhoevel [GER]

PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 12:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Redeeman wrote:

you would need direct rendering manager in the kernel, to get 3d acceleration from the xorg drivers

thats how i understood it, right. so.. what gives? did you already test this one?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gandalf98
Guru
Guru


Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 472
Location: Loano

PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've the the Direct Rendering Manager compiled in the kernel 2.6.10, but

Code:
# glxinfo
name of display: :0.0
display: :0  screen: 0
direct rendering: No
server glx vendor string: SGI
server glx version string: 1.2
................

My GeForce 2 GTS with 32MB with xorg 6.8.2 give the following result
Code:

846 frames in 5.0 seconds = 169.200 FPS
840 frames in 5.0 seconds = 168.000 FPS
840 frames in 5.0 seconds = 168.000 FPS
840 frames in 5.0 seconds = 168.000 FPS
840 frames in 5.0 seconds = 168.000 FPS
840 frames in 5.0 seconds = 168.000 FPS
840 frames in 5.0 seconds = 168.000 FPS
840 frames in 5.0 seconds = 168.000 FPS
840 frames in 5.0 seconds = 168.000 FPS


and with the nvidia driver 1.0-5336:

Code:

5591 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1118.200 FPS
6181 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1236.200 FPS
6180 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1236.000 FPS
5804 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1160.800 FPS
5633 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1126.600 FPS
6038 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1207.600 FPS
6039 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1207.800 FPS
6070 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1214.000 FPS
6190 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1238.000 FPS
6085 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1217.000 FPS
5882 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1176.400 FPS
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CDLM
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 179
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 6:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

well I guess 10x as slow is an improvement ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
codergeek42
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 5142
Location: Anaheim, CA (USA)

PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 7:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

float- wrote:
do you also say gnu/linux instead of just linux?
Depends. If I'm referring to only the kernel I will call it Linux, as it is named. If I am referring to the entire OS, I call it GNU/Linux.
_________________
~~ Peter: Programmer, Mathematician, STEM & Free Software Advocate, Enlightened Agent, Transhumanist, Fedora contributor
Who am I? :: EFF & FSF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
codergeek42
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 5142
Location: Anaheim, CA (USA)

PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 7:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Woah! This a fantastic improvement! I just ran glxgears again (yes, I know, not a good benchmark...) and I got ~190 FPS. Last time I used the proprietary driver I got ~320 FPS, and with X.org 6.8.1 i got ~90 FPS without hardware acceleration. This is on a Riva TNT2 M64, 2x AGP, 32 MB.


Holy crap. I'm getting ~19 FPS full-screen (1152x864)....this is crazy stuff....
_________________
~~ Peter: Programmer, Mathematician, STEM & Free Software Advocate, Enlightened Agent, Transhumanist, Fedora contributor
Who am I? :: EFF & FSF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MrSums
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 25 May 2003
Posts: 283
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 11:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

codergeek42 wrote:
Woah! This a fantastic improvement! I just ran glxgears again (yes, I know, not a good benchmark...) and I got ~190 FPS. Last time I used the proprietary driver I got ~320 FPS, and with X.org 6.8.1 i got ~90 FPS without hardware acceleration. This is on a Riva TNT2 M64, 2x AGP, 32 MB.


Holy crap. I'm getting ~19 FPS full-screen (1152x864)....this is crazy stuff....


Are you running Xorg.6.8.2? What Nvidia drivers are you using? I am having problems setting nvidia up with new version and can only get X running with "nv" with my Riva TNT2

Thanks

Robert
_________________
If you dont ask, you wont get
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
codergeek42
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 5142
Location: Anaheim, CA (USA)

PostPosted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 5:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MrSums wrote:
Are you running Xorg.6.8.2? What Nvidia drivers are you using? I am having problems setting nvidia up with new version and can only get X running with "nv" with my Riva TNT2
I'm running X.org 6.8.2 with the nv driver.
_________________
~~ Peter: Programmer, Mathematician, STEM & Free Software Advocate, Enlightened Agent, Transhumanist, Fedora contributor
Who am I? :: EFF & FSF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Redeeman
l33t
l33t


Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 958
Location: Portugal

PostPosted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

to the guy that asked if i tried it: no, i didnt, i just know it...

you ppl also need to load the dri module in xorg.conf, plus set permissions to something like 0660 in xorg.conf too, and then finally do opengl-update xorg-x11, then it will use direct rendering, and it will be usable, not nearly as good as nvidia driver, but okay (unless ofcourse they made a extremely good driver in latest release)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum