emerge shfs failes...

Shake · n00b Joined: 29 Jun 2004 Posts: 59

Hi,

emerging shfs fails with the following error. I have found a bug that describes the same problem - but no solution

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81194

The other guy also has a AMD64 system. So maybe this is the problem...

Thanks for your help.

shadow255 · Guru Joined: 04 Apr 2003 Posts: 412

You could try something that was recommended in one of the comments in that bug: unmask and use net-fs/shfs-0.35-r1.
_________________
Vogon poetry is of course the third worst in the Universe. -- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Shake · n00b Joined: 29 Jun 2004 Posts: 59

aaaargh. Thanks for your post - you opened my eyes

But version 0.35-r1 fails also:

kamikaze04 · Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2005 2:19 pm Post subject:

i had the same problem and i solved it emerging shfs-0.35-r1
_________________
Todo lo que quisiste saber sobre google en: www.noticiasgoogle.es

.damon · n00b Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 6

Hi Shake, did you solve your problem since your last post?

I am having the same problem. 2 things I did that _may_ be related to this:
1- emerge --prune (I had to recompile some stuff that this command removed)
2- changed kernel from 2.6.8 to 2.6.10

I still have the module for my 2.6.8 kernel but I can no longer compile shfs. The version I am trying to install is 0.35-r1.
Did you do one of these 2 actions lately ? (or anything else you don't usually do and that is a frequent source of problems)

.damon · n00b Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 6

Hi I "solved" my problem. In fact, it is a work-around:

Shake · n00b Joined: 29 Jun 2004 Posts: 59

.damon · n00b Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 6

did you try to go to the working directory in /var/tmp/portage/ (the place where emerge unpack tarballs and build them) to try to build it manually ?
_________________
The machine needs a Operating System in itself. And it's better to be free, free from all of us.
Then, the public licence will be updated by itself, and we will be able to accept it, or reject it.

tnt · Veteran Joined: 27 Feb 2004 Posts: 1222

Should we write bug report?

shfs-0.31-r1 doesn't compile well even on x86 !!!

It would be called unstable and 0.35-r1 stable one...
_________________
gentoo user

Lucifeer · Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2005 11:01 am Post subject:

Neither shfs-0.31 or shfs-0.35-rc1 compiles here.

It's on bugs.gentoo.org:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
_________________
Amd64 3200+ 1024DDR - workstation
AmdXP 1800+ 512sdram - server
Celeron 1.2ghz 128sdram - laptop
AMD64 live-cd w/Reiser4-support http://livecd.todesmut.org/

garyd9 · n00b Joined: 07 Apr 2004 Posts: 28

A related bug which I found while trying to merge shfs since moving to 2005.0:

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87278

I don't think this is a bug with shfs itself, but a bug with the glibc multilib header setup used with 2005.0 and glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1

On the other hand, I haven't (yet) encountered anything else which causes the above mentioned bug (haven't really gone out of my way to find anything either, though)

puchu · n00b Joined: 15 Feb 2005 Posts: 15

i use an amd64 system but the 2004.3 profile and i get the same error

my system info

Portage 2.0.51.19 (default-linux/amd64/2004.3, gcc-3.4.3, glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1, 2.6.11-gentoo-r6 x86_64)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.11-gentoo-r6 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.16
Python: dev-lang/python-2.3.4-r1 [2.3.4 (#1, Feb 7 2005, 15:05:20)]
dev-lang/python: 2.3.4-r1
sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.59-r6
sys-devel/automake: 1.8.5-r3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.4_p6, 1.9.4
sys-devel/binutils: 2.15.92.0.2-r7
sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.10-r4
virtual/os-headers: 2.6.8.1-r4
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-march=x86-64 -O2 -pipe"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/env /usr/kde/3.3/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS=""
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache distlocks sandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/opsys/linux/gentoo/"
LANG="de_DE@euro"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage-de /usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.europe.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="amd64 X acpi alsa avi berkdb bitmap-fonts cdr crypt cups curl dga divx4linux dvd encode esd fam flac font-server foomaticdb fortran gif gimpprint gnome gpm gtk gtk2 imagemagick imlib irda jp2 jpeg kde lzw lzw-tiff motif mozilla mp3 mpeg multilib ncurses nls nptl nptlonly oggvorbis opengl oss pam perl png ppds python qt quicktime readline real sdl socks5 ssl tcpd tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts usb xinerama xml2 xmms xpm xprint xrandr xv xvid zlib linguas_de"
Unset: ASFLAGS, CBUILD, CTARGET, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS

puchu · n00b Joined: 15 Feb 2005 Posts: 15

i get this error and i use the 2.6.11 kernel and the shfs version 0.35 because 0.35-r1 doesn't run fine (always crashes the connection

bash-2.05b# emerge =shfs-0.35
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 1) net-fs/shfs-0.35 to /
>>> md5 src_uri ;-)

shfs-0.35.tar.gz
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking shfs-0.35.tar.gz to /tmp/portage/shfs-0.35/work
>>> Source unpacked.
gcc -g -Wall -I- -I. -I../shfs/Linux-2.4/ -DSHFS_VERSION=\"unknown\" -c shfsmount.c -o shfsmount.o
sed -e '/^[ ]*#/d;/^$/d;s/\\/\\\\/g;s/\"/\\\"/g;s/^$.*$$/\"\1\\n\"/' <shell-test.in | sed -e "s/'/'\\\\\\\\''/g" >shell-test.h
sed -e '/^[ ]*#/d;/^$/d;s/\\/\\\\/g;s/\"/\\\"/g;s/^$.*$$/\"\1\\n\"/' <shell-code.in | sed -e "s/'/'\\\\\\\\''/g" >shell-code.h
sed -e '/^[ ]*#/d;/^$/d;s/\\/\\\\/g;s/\"/\\\"/g;s/^$.*$$/\"\1\\n\"/' <perl-test.in | sed -e "s/'/'\\\\\\\\''/g" >perl-test.h
sed -e '/^[ ]*#/d;/^$/d;s/\\/\\\\/g;s/\"/\\\"/g;s/^$.*$$/\"\1\\n\"/' <perl-code.in | sed -e "s/'/'\\\\\\\\''/g" >perl-code.h
In file included from /usr/include/linux/errno.h:4,
from /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25,
from /usr/include/errno.h:36,
from shfsmount.c:23:
/usr/include/asm/errno.h:7:33: ../asm-x86_64/errno.h: No such file or directory
In file included from /usr/include/bits/ioctls.h:24,
from /usr/include/sys/ioctl.h:27,
from /usr/include/sys/mount.h:26,
from shfsmount.c:33:
/usr/include/asm/ioctls.h:7:34: ../asm-x86_64/ioctls.h: No such file or directory
gcc -g -Wall -I- -I. -I../shfs/Linux-2.4/ -DSHFS_VERSION=\"unknown\" -c shfsumount.c -o shfsumount.o
In file included from /usr/include/linux/errno.h:4,
from /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25,
from /usr/include/errno.h:36,
from shfsumount.c:6:
/usr/include/asm/errno.h:7:33: ../asm-x86_64/errno.h: No such file or directory
In file included from /usr/include/bits/ioctls.h:24,
from /usr/include/sys/ioctl.h:27,
from /usr/include/sys/mount.h:26,
from shfsumount.c:9:
/usr/include/asm/ioctls.h:7:34: ../asm-x86_64/ioctls.h: No such file or directory
In file included from /usr/include/linux/param.h:4,
from /usr/include/sys/param.h:24,
from shfsumount.c:12:
/usr/include/asm/param.h:7:33: ../asm-x86_64/param.h: No such file or directory
shfsumount.c: In function `umount_ok':
shfsumount.c:46: error: `EINVAL' undeclared (first use in this function)
shfsumount.c:46: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
shfsumount.c:46: error: for each function it appears in.)
shfsumount.c:52: error: `ENOTDIR' undeclared (first use in this function)
shfsumount.c:57: error: `EPERM' undeclared (first use in this function)
make: *** [shfsumount.o] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
In file included from /usr/include/bits/socket.h:304,
from /usr/include/sys/socket.h:35,
from shfsmount.c:35:
/usr/include/asm/socket.h:7:34: ../asm-x86_64/socket.h: No such file or directory
In file included from /usr/include/linux/param.h:4,
from /usr/include/sys/param.h:24,
from shfsmount.c:37:
/usr/include/asm/param.h:7:33: ../asm-x86_64/param.h: No such file or directory
shfsmount.c: In function `mount_ok':
shfsmount.c:192: error: `ENOTDIR' undeclared (first use in this function)
shfsmount.c:192: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
shfsmount.c:192: error: for each function it appears in.)
shfsmount.c:200: error: `EPERM' undeclared (first use in this function)
shfsmount.c: In function `main':
shfsmount.c:639: error: `ENODEV' undeclared (first use in this function)
shfsmount.c:662: warning: implicit declaration of function `_IOW'
shfsmount.c:662: error: parse error before "int"
make: *** [shfsmount.o] Error 1

!!! ERROR: net-fs/shfs-0.35 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 29, Exitcode 2
!!! (no error message)
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.

but there is a workaround for 0.35 and 0.35-r1.... it seems that it crashes when compiling the 2.4 shfs module (don't know why it compilies the 2.4 module, but who cares ......

)

go to your Portage dir
mine is /tmp

do a

cd /tmp/portage/shfs-0.35/work/shfs-0.35/shfs/Linux-2.6/
and a
make && make install && modules-update && modprobe shfs

thats it, you have the shfs kernel module

have a nice day

brodieboy · n00b Joined: 06 Sep 2004 Posts: 36

has anyone gotten around this?
after the shfs kernel module is made how do I go about making the commands
shfsmount?
_________________
AMD AthlonXP 2800+
Nvidia GeForce FX 5700ve
1.2 GB DDR
SB Live! Value
Gigabyte GA-7N400-L
WD 120GB

Lappy
AMD 64 Athlon 3000+
Nvidia GeForce 4 440 go 64MB
512 MB DDR
80 GB Toshiba HD

Forse · Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:04 pm Post subject:

Yep, manual compiling of shfs module is easy, but shfsmount is another thing ;(