| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ferg
Guru
Joined: 15 Nov 2002
Posts: 536
Location: Cambridge, UK
|
 Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:19 pm Post subject: unmasking Gnome 2.10 |
 |
|
| Quote: | | can somebody explain me how do i unmask all this thing? thanks |
Well there's 2 obvious answers to that question:
(1) If you have to ask..........
and
(2) search the forums....
But hey, I'm not too cynical today!!
(3) Add all the lines from <PORTDIR>/profiles/package.mask that mask out Gnome 2.10. There's quite a lot for Gnome, and they are nicely commented.
Then add these lines into /etc/portage/package.unmask.
Emerge away!
but remember they are masked for a reason. A few ebuilds are missing, and there's likely to be quite a few issues that will come out over the next few weeks. The actual software only came out today. That being said, it looks good for me!
Cheers
Ferg |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WladyX
Guru
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 503
Location: Romania
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you have gtk-sharp installed? Acording to this this file is povided by gtk-sharp, anyways, you could try making a link named vte-sharp.pc pointing to vte.pc (in the pkgconfig dir of course).
_________________
We are not alone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sugarat
Guru
Joined: 24 Jul 2002
Posts: 348
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2.10 at last - hooray!!
Does this mean it will actually log out now when I click 'Log out' on the menu??
_________________
--[ UltraSPARC ]--
Accept no imitations |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WladyX
Guru
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 503
Location: Romania
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sugarat wrote: | | Does this mean it will actually log out now when I click 'Log out' on the menu?? |
That's a good one  
_________________
We are not alone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
midnite_commander
n00b
Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 51
Location: Madison, WI
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pardon my n00bness, but I'm wondering what the deal is with the versioning system here. As far as I can tell I'm running Gnome 2.8, so why is the newest release 2.10? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WladyX
Guru
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 503
Location: Romania
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| midnite_commander wrote: | | Pardon my n00bness, but I'm wondering what the deal is with the versioning system here. As far as I can tell I'm running Gnome 2.8, so why is the newest release 2.10? |
Because 10 is greater than 8!
_________________
We are not alone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sanderfox
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 101
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Versions like 2.3, 2.5, 2.7 and 2.9 are/were unstable. 2.4, 2.6, 2.8 and now 2.10 are stable releases  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
codergeek42
Bodhisattva
Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 5142
Location: Anaheim, CA (USA)
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| midnite_commander wrote: | | Pardon my n00bness, but I'm wondering what the deal is with the versioning system here. As far as I can tell I'm running Gnome 2.8, so why is the newest release 2.10? |
For most big projects like this, an even-numbered release (2.4, 2.6, 2.8, 2.10, etc.)is deemed as the stable branch, whereas an odd-numbered release is usually considered a "testing" or "development" branch (such as 2.5, 2.7, 2.9, etc.)
_________________
~~ Peter: Programmer, Mathematician, STEM & Free Software Advocate, Enlightened Agent, Transhumanist, Fedora contributor
Who am I? :: EFF & FSF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dmouritsendk
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 22 Jun 2002
Posts: 138
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WladyX wrote: | | Because 10 is greater than 8! |
but .10 < .8 so the "confusion" is understandable  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VValdo
Guru
Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 395
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| midnite_commander wrote: | | Pardon my n00bness, but I'm wondering what the deal is with the versioning system here. As far as I can tell I'm running Gnome 2.8, so why is the newest release 2.10? |
Yeah, it's "two point ten" not "two point one zero"
W |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
midnite_commander
n00b
Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 51
Location: Madison, WI
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
*invokes voice of stewie*
Boy, will your face be red when they find the black box on this one.
*end stewie voice*
Thanks for the timely reponses, all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thoffmeyer
Apprentice
Joined: 11 Apr 2004
Posts: 208
Location: GMT -5 Hours
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If someone makes/finds an 2.10 unmask, it would be greatly apreciated.
_________________
Conrad Guide, Current Maintainer
Join us on IRC
Server: irc.freenode.net
Channel: #conrad |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Goalie_Ca
Apprentice
Joined: 13 Jan 2003
Posts: 156
Location: Vancouver,B.C
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | and hopefully the gstreamer docs get a little better (I know what you're going to say, but I don't have the time to do it |
Lol. I agree with you 100%. Take a look at libpng's docs then take a look at libSDL's docs. Clearly there's a big difference. I've avoided using libraries because documentation has been so horrible and i've chosen others because the documentation is excellent. I'm sure many other devs have done the same because we don't always have to time to trip up over trivial shit.
_________________
Jabber: goalieca[AT]jabber.fr
Beautiful Vancouver, B.C.
http://www.sfu.ca/~rdickie/images/sig_small.jpg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nightski
n00b
Joined: 24 Jan 2005
Posts: 8
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thoffmeyer,
Just go into /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask and you will see a section called # Gnome 2.10 Mask. Copy all the entries there into /etc/portage/package.unmask and then emerge -up gnome.
That's it! I am emerging now.
Let me know if you have any troubles. Looks like a ton of improvments - so many I am looking forward to.
For example -
Wireless NIC configuration in Gnome
Trash Icon as Panel Icon
New Menu Structure (Places menu like in Ubuntu)
Much more... haha |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vandorp
n00b
Joined: 08 May 2004
Posts: 56
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sugarat wrote: | | Does this mean it will actually log out now when I click 'Log out' on the menu?? |
Good one indeed... I disabled "Automatically save changes to session" in "applications" -> "desktop preferences" -> "advanced" -> "sessions". This helped A LOT! The thing actually logs out & back in again every time. Don't know if this is your problem but it's worth a try.
I Thought it was a useless feature anyway. It complains about not being able to save firefox's state (so what? I just want to log out please) which is quite annoying because firefox is always open here. Also the nautilus windows are completely messed up after restart (the ones that had a location bar lost it).
Looking forward to 2.10 however, newer releases are usually better. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gregcoit
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 12 Jun 2002
Posts: 101
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:08 pm Post subject: Basic gnome question |
|
|
I'm probably going to play with installing gnome 2.10 in a few days (only have kde installed atm), but is there a way to install gnome w/o epiphany, mozilla and evolution?
Thanks!
_________________
"Life would be so much easier if we could see the source code" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bombs14
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 Sep 2003
Posts: 140
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gnome-light is your answer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thoffmeyer
Apprentice
Joined: 11 Apr 2004
Posts: 208
Location: GMT -5 Hours
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nightski wrote: | thoffmeyer,
Just go into /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask and you will see a section called # Gnome 2.10 Mask. Copy all the entries there into /etc/portage/package.unmask and then emerge -up gnome.
That's it! I am emerging now.
Let me know if you have any troubles. Looks like a ton of improvments - so many I am looking forward to.
For example -
Wireless NIC configuration in Gnome
Trash Icon as Panel Icon
New Menu Structure (Places menu like in Ubuntu)
Much more... haha |
Lol, forgot about that, I remeber I had to do that like.. when 2.8 came out.
_________________
Conrad Guide, Current Maintainer
Join us on IRC
Server: irc.freenode.net
Channel: #conrad |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
younker
Apprentice
Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 280
Location: China
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:43 pm Post subject: emerge bug-buddy failed |
|
|
make[2]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/bug-buddy-2.10.0/work/bug-buddy-2.10.0/docs'
xsltproc -o bug-buddy-C.omf --stringparam db2omf.basename bug-buddy --stringparam db2omf.format 'docbook' --stringparam db2omf.dtd "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN" --stringparam db2omf.lang C --stringparam db2omf.omf_dir "/usr/share/omf" --stringparam db2omf.help_dir "/usr/share/gnome/help" --stringparam db2omf.omf_in "`pwd`/./bug-buddy.omf.in" `pkg-config --variable db2omf gnome-doc-utils` C/bug-buddy.xml
compilation error: file C/bug-buddy.xml line 12 element article
xsltParseStylesheetProcess : document is not a stylesheet
make[2]: *** [bug-buddy-C.omf] ´íÎó 5
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/bug-buddy-2.10.0/work/bug-buddy-2.10.0/docs'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] ´íÎó 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/bug-buddy-2.10.0/work/bug-buddy-2.10.0'
make: *** [all] ´íÎó 2
!!! ERROR: gnome-extra/bug-buddy-2.10.0 failed.
!!! Function gnome2_src_compile, Line 40, Exitcode 2
!!! compile failure
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
joem
Retired Dev
Joined: 20 Dec 2002
Posts: 508
Location: Bloomington, In
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:25 am Post subject: Re: emerge bug-buddy failed |
|
|
| younker wrote: | make[2]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/bug-buddy-2.10.0/work/bug-buddy-2.10.0/docs'
xsltproc -o bug-buddy-C.omf --stringparam db2omf.basename bug-buddy --stringparam db2omf.format 'docbook' --stringparam db2omf.dtd "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN" --stringparam db2omf.lang C --stringparam db2omf.omf_dir "/usr/share/omf" --stringparam db2omf.help_dir "/usr/share/gnome/help" --stringparam db2omf.omf_in "`pwd`/./bug-buddy.omf.in" `pkg-config --variable db2omf gnome-doc-utils` C/bug-buddy.xml
compilation error: file C/bug-buddy.xml line 12 element article
xsltParseStylesheetProcess : document is not a stylesheet
make[2]: *** [bug-buddy-C.omf] ´íÎó 5
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/bug-buddy-2.10.0/work/bug-buddy-2.10.0/docs'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] ´íÎó 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/bug-buddy-2.10.0/work/bug-buddy-2.10.0'
make: *** [all] ´íÎó 2
!!! ERROR: gnome-extra/bug-buddy-2.10.0 failed.
!!! Function gnome2_src_compile, Line 40, Exitcode 2
!!! compile failure
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message. |
sync in a little bit and try again, it should bring in gnome-doc-utils as a dep now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gregcoit
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 12 Jun 2002
Posts: 101
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bombs14 wrote: | | gnome-light is your answer |
Indeed it was - Thanks!
Greg
_________________
"Life would be so much easier if we could see the source code" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
graphic23
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 102
Location: Chicago
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
hmm...
| Code: |
[blocks B ] <=x11-themes/gnome-themes-2.8.2 (from pkg x11-themes/gtk-engines-2.6.2)
[blocks B ] <app-admin/gnome-system-tools-1.1.91 (from pkg app-admin/system-tools-backends-1.2.0)
[ebuild U ] dev-libs/glib-2.6.3 [2.4.8]
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/pango-1.8.1 [1.6.0]
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/gtk+-2.6.4 [2.4.13-r1]
[ebuild U ] dev-util/guile-1.6.7 [1.6.4-r1]
[ebuild U ] gnome-extra/gnome-games-2.10.0 [2.8.1-r1]
[ebuild U ] app-text/gpdf-2.10.0 [2.8.1-r1]
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-menus-2.10.0
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/libxklavier-2.0 [1.04-r1]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/control-center-2.10.0 [2.8.1-r1]
[ebuild U ] x11-wm/metacity-2.10.0 [2.8.6-r1]
[ebuild U ] x11-themes/gtk-engines-2.6.2 [2.2.0]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/librsvg-2.9.5 [2.8.1]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/libgtop-2.10.0 [2.8.1]
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/gtksourceview-1.2.0 [1.1.1]
[ebuild U ] app-editors/gedit-2.10.0 [2.8.2]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/gnome-session-2.10.0 [2.8.1]
[ebuild U ] gnome-extra/nautilus-cd-burner-2.10.0 [2.8.5]
[ebuild U ] dev-libs/libxslt-1.1.12 [1.1.9-r1]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/gnome-vfs-2.10.0 [2.8.3-r1]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/libglade-2.5.0 [2.4.0]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/gnome-desktop-2.10.0 [2.8.1]
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/libwnck-2.10.0 [2.8.1]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/gnome-panel-2.10.0 [2.8.2]
[ebuild U ] gnome-extra/gnome-utils-2.10.0 [2.8.1]
[ebuild U ] net-analyzer/gnome-netstatus-2.10.0 [2.8.0]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/gconf-2.9.91 [2.8.1-r1]
[ebuild U ] gnome-extra/gconf-editor-2.10.0 [2.8.2]
[ebuild U ] net-libs/libsoup-2.2.2 [2.2.1]
[ebuild U ] gnome-extra/evolution-data-server-1.2.0 [1.0.2]
[ebuild U ] gnome-extra/evolution-webcal-2.2.0 [2.0.1]
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/startup-notification-0.8 [0.7]
[ebuild U ] x11-terms/gnome-terminal-2.10.0 [2.8.0]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/gnome-keyring-0.4.1 [0.4.0]
[ebuild NS ] gnome-extra/gal-2.4.0
[ebuild U ] x11-themes/gnome-icon-theme-2.10.0 [2.8.0]
[ebuild NS ] gnome-extra/libgtkhtml-3.6.0
[ebuild U ] mail-client/evolution-2.2.0 [2.0.2]
[ebuild U ] media-libs/gstreamer-0.8.9-r2 [0.8.7]
[ebuild N ] app-admin/system-tools-backends-1.2.0
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/gnome-applets-2.10.0 [2.8.1.1]
[ebuild U ] gnome-extra/zenity-2.10.0 [2.8.1]
[ebuild U ] net-print/libgnomecups-0.2.0 [0.1.10]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/libgnomeprint-2.10.0 [2.8.1]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/libgnomeprintui-2.10.0.1 [2.8.1]
[ebuild U ] x11-themes/gnome-themes-2.10.0 [2.8.1]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/libgnome-2.10.0 [2.8.0]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/libgnomecanvas-2.10.0 [2.8.0]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/libgnomeui-2.10.0 [2.8.0]
[ebuild U ] app-text/ggv-2.8.3 [2.8.1]
[ebuild U ] gnome-extra/gcalctool-5.5.41 [4.4.20]
[ebuild U ] dev-libs/libxml2-2.6.17 [2.6.15-r1]
[ebuild U ] gnome-extra/yelp-2.6.5 [2.6.4]
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/vte-0.11.12 [0.11.11-r2]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/orbit-2.12.1 [2.12.0]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/libbonoboui-2.8.1 [2.8.0]
[ebuild U ] media-libs/gst-plugins-0.8.8 [0.8.5-r1]
[ebuild N ] media-plugins/gst-plugins-flac-0.8.8
[ebuild U ] media-plugins/gst-plugins-oss-0.8.8 [0.8.5]
[ebuild U ] media-plugins/gst-plugins-alsa-0.8.8 [0.8.5]
[ebuild N ] media-plugins/gst-plugins-esd-0.8.8
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/eel-2.10.0 [2.8.2]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/nautilus-2.10.0 [2.8.2-r1]
[ebuild U ] app-admin/gnome-system-tools-1.2.0 [1.0.2-r1]
[ebuild U ] gnome-extra/bug-buddy-2.10.0 [2.8.0]
[ebuild N ] x11-themes/gnome-backgrounds-2.10.0
[ebuild U ] gnome-extra/gucharmap-1.4.3 [1.4.2]
[ebuild U ] net-misc/vino-2.10.0 [2.8.0.1]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/libbonobo-2.8.1 [2.8.0]
[ebuild U ] gnome-extra/gnome-media-2.10.0 [2.8.0]
[ebuild U ] gnome-extra/gnome-system-monitor-2.10.0 [2.8.0]
[ebuild U ] dev-libs/libIDL-0.8.5 [0.8.4]
[ebuild U ] media-libs/libart_lgpl-2.3.17 [2.3.16]
[ebuild U ] app-arch/file-roller-2.10.0 [2.8.3]
[ebuild U ] net-www/epiphany-1.6.0 [1.4.6]
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/gnome-2.10_pre0 [2.8.1-r1]
|
THe probelm is that System-tools-backends is a dep of GNOME-System-TOols.. Not sure what to do.. any help ?
_________________
Sincerly,
Graphic23 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thoffmeyer
Apprentice
Joined: 11 Apr 2004
Posts: 208
Location: GMT -5 Hours
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
yeah im getting the same thing
_________________
Conrad Guide, Current Maintainer
Join us on IRC
Server: irc.freenode.net
Channel: #conrad |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nos_
n00b
Joined: 16 Nov 2004
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:07 am Post subject: Same Problem with bug-buddy |
|
|
| I'm having the same problem maybe the dependency will be solved soon. Also totem is broken as it depends on the previous version of nautilus CD burner I think. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
joem
Retired Dev
Joined: 20 Dec 2002
Posts: 508
Location: Bloomington, In
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
the dep is not broken. Any version of gnome-system tools before 1.9.92 doesn't have the backend split out, and will cause collision problems when you merge system-tools-backends. You need to unmerge <gnome-system-tools-1.1.92 in order to upgrade.
New totem should be available tomorrow, deps break when using stuff in package.mask |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Desktop Environments
