View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
John5788 Advocate
Joined: 06 Apr 2004 Posts: 2140 Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Darckness wrote: | pifactorial wrote: | pifactorial wrote: | ARRGH! Twice now, this kernel has "soft locked" on me while using Firefox with high CPU usage. |
Make that THREE times!
Please tell me this will be fixed in the next kernel. |
As always, I can make no guarantees.
seppe has notified me that he's already working on the next version, and that he has a "special" surprise for framebuffer users. |
drop back to old working version? _________________ John5788 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pifactorial Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 15 Oct 2004 Posts: 77 Location: 3<x<4 on the gamma function
|
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
John5788 wrote: | Darckness wrote: | pifactorial wrote: | pifactorial wrote: | ARRGH! Twice now, this kernel has "soft locked" on me while using Firefox with high CPU usage. |
Make that THREE times!
Please tell me this will be fixed in the next kernel. |
As always, I can make no guarantees.
seppe has notified me that he's already working on the next version, and that he has a "special" surprise for framebuffer users. |
drop back to old working version? |
Maybe a good idea - the earlier 2.6.11 kernels would hardlock in the same situation. Maybe I should fall back to 2.6.10.
WOOT! 2.6.12 is finally doing some more work on joystick stuff. Can force feedback be far behind?
EDIT: I sense somebody's about to say "but iForce has been in the kernel for a long time now", so I'd like to point out that I've been bugging Darckness about a specific force-feedback compatability issue for a long time now. If FF already works for you, that's great. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|