| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
klemi
Guru
Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 494
Location: Erbach b. Ulm
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:19 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
westboy21 wrote:
| Quote: | Well for one, right before it craps out, it shows that it finished compiling the man pages for all the locales, and then it dies. Put that together with the information in the ebuild file, where they say that the following script is part of their new config setup for building locales. If you comment out this section it builds fine. If you
echo "sys-libs/glibc userlocales" >> /etc/portage/package.use
then it seems to work ok as well. |
........this has no effects of the issue we discuss in this thread. I have define "userlocales" in etc/portage/package.use for a long time.
_________________
Gentoo 2.6.16-r12; AMD Athlon 3GHz; NVidia GeForce 5700; Hauppauge nexus-s |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cbradney
Apprentice
Joined: 08 May 2003
Posts: 245
Location: Luxembourg
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I already have that setting and get the failure.
_________________
Scribus: Open Source Desktop Publishing http://www.scribus.net. Emerge it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
protonchris
n00b
Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I followed the "Optional: GLIBC Locales" section from the AMD64 Handbook, but I still get the segmentation fault.
Chris. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
epic
n00b
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 44
Location: norway
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
that is correct, this isnt a locales issue, the lines of code that actually segfaults indicates something more severe...
the code:
| Code: |
for x in ls ps date ; do
env LD_LIBRARY_PATH="${D}/$(get_libdir)" ${x} > /dev/null \
|| die "simple run test (${x}) failed"
done
|
actually sets the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the newly compiled and installed gilbc and tests the binaries ls, ps and date against this glibc-library...again, why that fails i dont know..
Last edited by epic on Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:32 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lolly83
n00b
Joined: 12 Feb 2005
Posts: 12
Location: Wildberg, Germany
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
same problem here. brand new stage 3 installation and first emerge --deep --update world.
in the handbook they put "sys-libs/glibc userlocales" in package.use
i put it in the make.conf does that mean any difference for this problem?
_________________
There's no place like 127.0.0.1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
epic
n00b
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 44
Location: norway
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| no, again this isnt a locale issue IMHO, and u can put userlocales in USE="" in make.conf without that causing any problems AFAIK... i have used userlocales and /etc/locales.build for some time now, without glibc causing a stirr about it.. :P |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
m1ngsheng
n00b
Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 50
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:50 pm Post subject: spread the word |
|
|
| ...if the solution becomes available somewhere else. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jhill10110
n00b
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 11
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Same thing here:
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1/work/glibc-2.3.3/localedata'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1/work/glibc-2.3.3'
* Installing man pages and docs...
/usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild.sh: line 1874: 20362 Segmentation fault env LD_LIBRARY_PATH="${D}/$(get_libdir)" ${x} >/dev/null
!!! ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1 failed.
!!! Function src_install, Line 1008, Exitcode 139
!!! simple run test (ls) failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lolly83
n00b
Joined: 12 Feb 2005
Posts: 12
Location: Wildberg, Germany
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
now i masked the package, not only because it doesn't install but because there are so many threads about seg-faulting systems during boot up after installing this version of glibc. I like gentoo, but THAT kind of problem shouldn't happen on a 'stable' distribution!
_________________
There's no place like 127.0.0.1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
protonchris
n00b
Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I will probably mask this version of glibc as well. What version of glibc would you guys recommend? I am trying to bootstrap a AMD64 machine.
Chris. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dmgmidoh
n00b
Joined: 27 Feb 2005
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have also had the same problem since early yesterday. I am doing a stage 1 on an AMD64 system. This worked about 3 days ago but then got the dreaded cyclic redundancy for perl problem. I decided to scratch the whole thing and start over. OOPS!
Has any body sent in a bug report yet? I do hope this gets resolved soon. I am anxiously awaiting to try out this new machine.
Last edited by dmgmidoh on Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:35 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sammalpa
n00b
Joined: 30 Jan 2005
Posts: 38
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:32 pm Post subject: bug filed |
|
|
The bug seems to be filed already.
bug 86465
Hopefully that gets resolved soon.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BlackB1rd
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 13 Aug 2003
Posts: 131
Location: /Europe/Netherlands/Haarlem
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was just on the phone with a friend of mine, who is currently doing a stage1 install on his brand new AMD64... Told him to comment out those lines which causes the segfault, now we've to wait to know if that succeeds. This shouldn't happen on a stable (and very important!) package  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
g3n
Guru
Joined: 13 Dec 2003
Posts: 543
Location: México
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i'm having the same problem, what i'm doing to solve that is:
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge glibc
which will emerge a 2.3.4.2005xxxx version or something similar, i think is working (although less stable this install appear to be working with out errors)
_________________
--[G]--
Last edited by g3n on Thu Mar 24, 2005 5:33 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LostSon
Guru
Joined: 21 Nov 2003
Posts: 514
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| michelle778 wrote: | | LostSon wrote: | same thing here on a fresh install cant go no further til i reconclile this  |
You might want to try a stage3 install and update later...at elast, that's what I'm doing know...
similar topic: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-2227117.html |
This is a stage 3 install, and it doesnt make a difference |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
epic
n00b
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 44
Location: norway
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i think you mean a 2.3.4-2005xxxx version, but that doesnt do it for me... :(
tried 2005** segfaulted just as badly.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
epic
n00b
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 44
Location: norway
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
as of now this seemed to fix it for me:
| Code: | | echo ">sys-libs/glibc-2.3.4.20041102" >> /etc/portage/package.mask |
:p
i know, its not a fix, but for me, it gets me installing gentoo, i can upgrade glibc later :) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rif
n00b
Joined: 23 Jan 2005
Posts: 25
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| What I don't understand (which is a LOT actually): why/how did something change in an "old" version of glibc? I'm assuming, perhaps incorrectly, that the name 2.3.4.20041102-r1 means it hasn't changed since November. Why have problems come up now and does that mean it may be something else, not glibc? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mr.isomer
n00b
Joined: 16 Feb 2004
Posts: 47
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| epic wrote: | as of now this seemed to fix it for me:
| Code: | | echo ">sys-libs/glibc-2.3.4.20041102" >> /etc/portage/package.mask |
:p
i know, its not a fix, but for me, it gets me installing gentoo, i can upgrade glibc later  |
indeed this is what i also did...it kinda sucks tho but i need my machine... and with reports that it couses problems, as some say, even after a correct compile I'd rather wait for an update or a fix of some kind |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lurch84
n00b
Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 8
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So from what I've seen the only options are:
1) Mask this version of glibc
*or*
2) emerge development versions of glibc
Well, not a great fix I suppose, but at least it should allow me to update the rest of my system...... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mickrussom
n00b
Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Same problem here.
Masked glibc and moved along.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1/work/glibc-2.3.3/localedata'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1/work/glibc-2.3.3'
* Installing man pages and docs...
/usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild.sh: line 1874: 4287 Segmentation fault env LD_LIBRARY_PATH="${D}/$(get_libdir)" ${x} >/dev/null
!!! ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1 failed.
!!! make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1/work/glibc-2.3.3/localedata'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1/work/glibc-2.3.3'
* Installing man pages and docs...
/usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild.sh: line 1874: 4287 Segmentation fault env LD_LIBRARY_PATH="${D}/$(get_libdir)" ${x} >/dev/null
!!! ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1 failed.
!!! Function src_install, Line 1008, Exitcode 139
!!! simple run test (ls) failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message., Line 1008, Exitcode 139
!!! simple run test (ls) failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Deathwing00
Bodhisattva
Joined: 13 Jun 2003
Posts: 4087
Location: Dresden, Germany
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Duplicate Threads
