View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
DrWoland l33t


Joined: 13 Nov 2004 Posts: 603
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 5:26 am Post subject: Is there a downside to using symlinks with my partitions? |
|
|
I have a fairly annoying partition table due to having a dualboot setup with excessive partitioning of the linux setup as part of a security excersize (sda1-sda13) and it gets annoying having to look at my notes to remember which partition is which. Is there anything wrong with having a /drives folder which has -s symlinks to the entries in /dev? I already tested and mount works with the symlinks, haven't tried fstab yet. Anybody know anything about this? _________________ I'm not a Guru, I just ask a lot of questions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
/dev/random l33t


Joined: 26 Nov 2004 Posts: 704 Location: Austin, Texas, USA
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DrWoland l33t


Joined: 13 Nov 2004 Posts: 603
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
I know, but is there really a point if I can just create static links? _________________ I'm not a Guru, I just ask a lot of questions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
/dev/random l33t


Joined: 26 Nov 2004 Posts: 704 Location: Austin, Texas, USA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 6:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you get more SATA hard drives you won't have to change the symlinks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DrWoland l33t


Joined: 13 Nov 2004 Posts: 603
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
/dev/random wrote: | If you get more SATA hard drives you won't have to change the symlinks. |
point, but probably not happening, and it'd be sdb anyway, which wouldn't do anything to these symlinks. _________________ I'm not a Guru, I just ask a lot of questions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|