View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mooerito Apprentice
Joined: 16 Dec 2003 Posts: 187 Location: Zurich/Switzerland
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kosa Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 May 2005 Posts: 106 Location: Prague
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gherald Veteran
Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 1399 Location: CLUAConsole
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mdadm is better in most respects
but keep raidtools (of which mkraid is a part) around as a fallback |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kosa Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 May 2005 Posts: 106 Location: Prague
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In which respects Gherald? I'm totally new to Linux, so I used the mkraid because it was the first HOWTO I founded with Google.
Thanks for answer |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gherald Veteran
Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 1399 Location: CLUAConsole
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
newer, more full-featured, centralized, and easier to use imo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mooerito Apprentice
Joined: 16 Dec 2003 Posts: 187 Location: Zurich/Switzerland
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gherald wrote: | newer, more full-featured, centralized, and easier to use imo |
ok i suppose that means i should stick to mdadm. i wont use the lvm part, but i think it will work without it as well, right?
in grub, can i use root=/dev/md0 or do i have to use root=/dev/sda1? raid1 support is built in kernel, not as module. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kosa Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 May 2005 Posts: 106 Location: Prague
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm, it's pitty, I have mkraid version up and running and I'm to lazy to switch now... But I'l try mdadm next install |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|