View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
KeithReuters Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Sep 2002 Posts: 130 Location: Newport Beach, California // Grenoble, France
|
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2003 6:52 pm Post subject: Xinerama |
|
|
Hello,
I have a GeForce Ti 200 and an STB LightSpeed (PCI).
I've gotten to make them both initialize, however whenever I start X, KDE or whatever, I get two identical screens... that display the same things at the same moment. Pretty useless... Moreover one is 1280x1024 and the other 1024x768 so apps won't take up the whole screen on my 17''. Ah.
I added Xinerama to my XF86Config file, as in described in this HowTo everyone keeps talking about (and that seems the only reference to Xinerama in the whole world wide web ).
Any ideas???
I really want KDE to manage both screens, and to be able to move windows from one screen to another.
If you need my XF86Config or anything, ask. I just don't want to post a huge thing and bother everyone with a 20 page long post.
Greetings from France (snoooooowy )
Pascal. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
addi Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 06 Jun 2002 Posts: 112 Location: waterloo, on, canada
|
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2003 6:57 pm Post subject: yes, please post XF86Config |
|
|
but show just the ServerLayout section(s)...
This would be where you put the Xinerama sections... _________________ James Addison
http://www.pjsoft.ca |
|
Back to top |
|
|
addi Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 06 Jun 2002 Posts: 112 Location: waterloo, on, canada
|
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2003 7:08 pm Post subject: ServerLayout |
|
|
if you had your two Screen sections labelled as "Screen 0" and "Screen 1", you're ServerLayout section might look like:
Code: |
Screen "Screen 0"
Screen "Screen 1" RightOf "Screen 0"
Option "Xinerama"
|
Also, you've turned on Xinerama, but make sure you've compiled X with xinerama support... I'm not sure about applications/window managers, but they may have to be compiled with Xinerama too.
Good luck. _________________ James Addison
http://www.pjsoft.ca |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KeithReuters Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Sep 2002 Posts: 130 Location: Newport Beach, California // Grenoble, France
|
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2003 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, here are the sections you might find interesting :
Code: |
Section "Device"
Identifier "STB LightSpeed 128"
Driver "tseng"
BusID "PCI:0:9:0"
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "GeForce 3"
Driver "nvidia"
BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
EndSection
[.....]
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "My Stupid Layout"
Screen "Screen 1"
Screen "Screen 2"
Screen "Screen 2" LeftOf "Screen 1"
Option "Xinerama" "True"
InputDevice "Mouse1" "CorePointer"
InputDevice "Keyboard1" "CoreKeyboard"
EndSection |
As you can see, everything seems OK.
The "make sure you've compiled X with Xinerama support" is making me nervous. I installed both XFree and KDE using the GRP's, which are *I think* new to Gentoo - they're somewhat like RPM's. Therefore, I haven't compiled anything, and I don't really want to - I had an LFS distro before, and compiling Xfree was a nightmare. Isn't Xinerama compiled in both KDE and XFree in Gentoo's GRP's?? If not, well, I'm gonna have to get myself a lot of coffee and start spending my nights tweaking those Makefile's. Ah, GNU is beautiful.
However, XFree doesn't crash, nor does it tell me anything in particular when I start it with "startx -- +xinerama", thus I assume it was compiled too. Am I wrong?
Is there a special menu in KDE's control panel for Xinerama? I have to say the Internet really lacks of information about this functionality.
Okay, I'm off to bed now, I am taking the TOEFL tomorrow.
You're from Canada? snoooowwwy baby
Nice icon.
Pascal. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
noff Guru
Joined: 11 Nov 2002 Posts: 388 Location: College Park, Maryland
|
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2003 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Compiling xfree on gentoo is nothing to be nervous about _________________ What Larry was saying is that if you make it too easy for programmers, then poor programmers will be able to do things best left to good programmers, and will inevitably do them poorly. Everyone will suffer in the long term as a result." - Tom Chance |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KeithReuters Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Sep 2002 Posts: 130 Location: Newport Beach, California // Grenoble, France
|
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2003 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nuh huh... if emerge xfree works, then I already have Xinerama, since I used the GRP's... I mean, isn't there an option, like emerge xfree --with-xinerama or something?
I was talking about compiling Xfree on an LFS distro |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KeithReuters Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Sep 2002 Posts: 130 Location: Newport Beach, California // Grenoble, France
|
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2003 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK I checked, Xinerama is compiled by default, and I also had a look at my /var/log/XFree86.0.log (or something) file, and at one point it says "Initializing Xinerama extension (built-in)", and there's no error msg.
However, my two screens display the same stuff at the same time, even when I run xdm or twm. I tried activating the Xinerama options in KDE's control panel, without success. Has anyone had this problem?
I thought it had something to do with my two screens running at different resolutions and overlapping, but even if I start both at 1024x768 I get this problem.
Oh, and Konqueror works, but I cannot browse my files anymore... it just hangs up. I tried deleting some config files, but it didn't work. What I did was changing the type of view from "large icons" to "small icons". Does anyone know a simple way of fixing this? Thanks...
Pascal
[Took the TOEFL, and got 245 out of 250, still waiting for my essay rating] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KeithReuters Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Sep 2002 Posts: 130 Location: Newport Beach, California // Grenoble, France
|
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2003 9:39 pm Post subject: Konqueror |
|
|
I've finally figured how to make Xinerama works. I now have dual-head up and working... In fact you have to mention only ONE screen in the ServerLayout section :
Screen "Screen 1"
Screen "Screen 1" RightOf "Screen 2"
etc.
The second one is only declared implicitely. Took me a while to figure that out.
I still have that problem with the file browser ("explorer ")... Anyone can help?
Pascal. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|